|
Changing Nature Of The Proletariat And Capitalist Class In The Globe
Changing Nature Of The Proletariat And Capitalist Class In The Globe
The proletariat class which has the only source of its labor to serve in the production and see the products be out from their work place for its owners at the cost of their wages for the markets for its returns covering the whole calculations of the expenditure as investment. The question of wages and the part of labor what the proletariat class delivers does not have any claim on the entirety of the cost of the product due to the quality and competitive cost of the products in the market. Moreover, in the feudal society the master or the semi-capitalist in the semi-feudal and semi-capitalist societies the master of the capitalist class works more than the labor and feudal lords in the non-productive side of the entirety of the productive process of the commodity as they have the sense of responsibility of looking out the entire process of the commodity for the market with its demand and quality.
Yes Karl Marx and Engel's efforts were great and exemplary at that time when they were alive. And they fought against the capitalism during their lives for the betterment of the working class. But in practice in the Great Britain the capitalism is going on along the side of American capitalism despite the different struggles and rebellions there.
The great philosopher, Karl Marx has done a lot from his base point in organizing the new class from the feudal society through his writings against the capitalists. But the capitalist society was risen from the debris of the feudal society there in Britain which was the winner in the wars against the old kingdoms of Europeans and Romans. This period is understood that the great wealth was gathered in the hands of British Empire and became the society of capitalism. The sixteenth and seventeenth century have been known as the industrial revolutionary age for those who tries to know the growth and progress of society towards future, treated as the great asset to understand the pace and movement of the societies towards the known destinations of the another form of the society that is none other than socialism as claimed by the Karl Marx.
The communist revolution which has been described by different schools of Marxism in different ways by the Karl Marx, Lenin, and the Moa due to their understandings and their own interpretations according to their situations based on their societies.
Lenin was greatly influenced by the writing of Karl Marx and started living his life basing on the writings of the Marx as he has himself kept the point in mind to retaliate the death of his brother against the regime at that time. He has seen the crucial periods of Russia in his life time for at least three times in making success the revolutions in Russia.
From the period of Sumerians to the present different civilizations, comparatively the working class what it be called serfs, landless labors or the proletariat they have been allowed to the level of just bread to live and insufficient cloths and tight and unworthy homes they were hardly arranged in their entire lives through their labor only and the present ruling class what it be called capitalist class from the period of industrial revolution in great Britain is gaining billions of billions they raised in their way of getting the money and became the richest in the world. Karl Marx whose Das capital the book stood in the list of third place after bible and Quran in the selling list the world people greatly attracted by his writings and stood against the capitalist class to defeat the capitalism through the revolution. Thousands of the groups formed and named the communist parties in the world. Basing on the writings the great leader of Soviet Union Lenin successfully won the revolution and set the goal for the world proletariat class to move forward towards socialist as a goal and aim of the proletariat class. During after the death of the great leader Lenin the Russian people started feeling that the life was not so easy with the food and cloths at the cost of their liberty what the state was to provide to them in the way the most unsuitably to their wishes and timings they received at that time. There was the system what they established to its people was not to the level of the wishes and wills what they trusted them to form the socialism. Here to understand the nature and the way of thinking of the human nature which was and is always changing from time to time irrespective of the region and religions what they belonged. The leadership and the state in soviet union was unable to meet the challenges and needs of the people who expected so much so what they could not be understood by their leaders before winning the revolution there at the cost of thousands of deaths for the cause of socialism. Societies, industrial houses, distribution centers and public distribution system was full of faults in maintaining their promises and allotting the rations in time, the dreams of the people in the socialist system was started shedding and became to see what system of the government would be matched to their thoughts. First they started to come out openly against the system with their views and wanted to change the system in accordance with some changes in the rules and provisions. The public resentment was started against the proletariat class which was only and sole criteria of the the ruling interest in the Soviet Union. The dream and cause of the proletariat class could not exist for more than 36- 37 years in the history of socialism in the world. The first model of the proletariat class in the socialist state was declines. The power from the hands of the proletariat class was again come back to the old class of the capitalist there against the wishes and wills of the proletariat class. The other model state under the command of the Mao came into existence and caused many hopes to the common people including world proletariat class during which thousand of people laid down their lives for the cause of socialism in restoring the interest of the working class there in china. Global proletariat class on the instance of the Chinese developments they believed once again and adopted it in their way what the Chinese have done in their model in leading the masses in their respective countries to win the revolution in the world including in India communist parties declared that their way was only the way what china was done in their state. This time too the Chinese revolution and its leadership have proves that they were not above the universal laws of market capitalism. Chinese government also sought the investment from the world capitalist countries. There is big difference in dealing the American hegemony by these Chinese and Russian governments in their way of dealing the cold war times. Chinese was not aggressive against the American market systems and its markets. Before falling the system of socialism to the capitalist system of governance the Chinese cleverly maintained silence while dealing the soviet union with the American government during the direct war times and in the cold war times for want of friendship in future from the Americans though they were still claiming that they committed to the principle of socialism at that time is proved that it was nothing but the cheating its own class of the people including the proletariat class. But no one was able to understand that these governments were against their people. Till the decline of their socialist ways they ware constantly declaring that they were not against the interest of the proletariat class and the poor people. In practice all claims were proved wrong in the history of the establishing efforts of the socialism in both Soviet Union and china. Now the another small but strong was come forward in forming the socialist state through the revolution on the deferent but definite formula they showed to the world people including the working class in Nepal under the command the Nepal's communist party led by the prachanda on the famous slogan of "prachanda path". More than five thousand people laid down their lives in the armed clashes there in Nepal. Under the threat and pressure of the Americans, Chinese and Indian governments, they were pressed towards to share the power in the government though they were already tired so much to lead the underground lives. The nepal's communist party is in leading the legal and normal lives through the sharing the power and ruling the government. The question of revolution on the map of the globe is remained unanswerable by all these states and its governances. It is now in India the Maoist party which has its presence in more than 15 states believing that they will win the revolution just before 2050 as its leader claimed today, and all most all leading news sourced published in lead story. The Indian communist party which has in the process of peace dialogue with government of India through the home minister, Sri P.Chidambaram and the spokesman of the Indian Maoist party has earlier said that they wage war against the security forces in the forest areas jungle mahal, and other parts, with the small squads. It is quite clear that the Indian Maoist party is not learned any lessons from its own past in west Bengal and in Andhra Pradesh. Moreover, the global issues on the subject of waging wars against the government with small and medium range of capability form the side of states, and from the source of the society proved unsuccessful and caused lot of deaths against the mighty forces of the state and global war industrial complexes. I request to those who leads the Indian communist party through this way to rethink about declaring the war against the government of India and its global alliances in the interest of the working class and poor people in this country, as you are all away from the legal and common problems of the working class and the poor and I feel to read extensively to understand the human nature irrespective of its affect through the assets and wealth for the application of what they believe in Marxism and in Maoism to the present society, as here everyone is in the corporate level of thinking. Please do not take any decision just for the news broadcasting media corporate market at the cost of costly lives, as you are the individual to make the news for the global people including the proletariat class.
Ayub Mohammed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_analysts
The Concept And Its View From Generality To Particularity
The Concept And Its View From Generality To Particularity
Every one has his or her own concept of worldly things and the objects what he or she has learned and understood from the stage of following to the leading stage of his or her own life everywhere and in every time from the age knowing himself or herself duly passing the schooling including learning parental teaching from childhood to the age of maturity. In other words it can be called from the dependence to independence from the point of thoughts to the ways of earning for life. The concept of everyone without specifications could be formed to understand that he is in his way of living in his own way. He has been busy in his own subjects and making his life busy with some objects set inside to continue his normal life. So that he can be called a man of his life with some of his ideas, actions, plans, pleasures, emotions, convictions, commitments, sorrows, loneliness, sharing of time at the interested issues, ideas, things and some times individuals for a while and used to maintain his life in such a way as he pleased even small breakup and small adding of one or other in his life. In essence here two things are very clearly established that the things and actions of his interest and his needed one and the another one which is least of his interest and have a little idea about it to act upon it as it is the part of outside of his concerns. And the same things can be divided on the lines of treating these two as the active form of subjects and the another is the passive form of acts and interest in the mind for external actions which guides him in his normal life as every one is living and the same principle is applicable to all in the society covering every corner and nook of the globe without dividing on the scale of developed, developing and other the most backward states. Every one may have the family as living and unifying factor for few family members in which more than one or all of its members may earn or for the common responsibility of the family. Mostly father, mother or elder earns for the self and the other dependents. This kind of members may have the additional responsibility of looking the family besides feeding it by maintaining his way of life and thoughts and have the circle of acts in cycling model for the interest of his concerns and his subjects in his life in the society. He has his subjects in his life and his actions upon which his experience and expertise of such subjects emerges in him besides the expertise in the field of earning which has already been fixed and used to continue either by his wish or for some other reasons behind his life as it has been emerged from its possible reach and length of its availability. every individual has been in the constant touch of the prioritized subjects of his own would lead him to stand in the expertise and extensive participation in such actions and its works be treated as the particularity in the subject and the same particularity make him to live him in the sphere of generality of other's views. Every one who has his views on others whose specifications and interests of his subjects for another can be called the generality. In essence the views of every one from his views on others may have the link and direct and indirect participation to the extent of their interests and their subjects can be treated for each other as generality and particularity. Generally speaking the share and the participation in their own subjects are interlinked for them and interchangeable in its nature. It establishes that the view of every one in primary level irrespective of considering the material facts called views only and the looking the material facts in the worldly things through their views called views only. The part of playing the key role from the first point of generality is particularity and which is the source and lead in other things of its origin and leading is called particularity only. Particularity itself can not see the whole thing of generality because the particularity is the nucleus and key factor in leading all the things like some other particularities that are the semblances for form the material world for the generality. In both ways including the material facts the views can go along side by side without requiring the convictions of others who views these things from their views as their generality by alienating themselves from the both views and its material facts. And alienation of others from their generality alone and sticking up themselves to their particular generality do not have any influence over it directly by other generalist views. The transformation of both views and material facts from the view of generality would never give rise in affecting it in transforming it from any form or from immaterialized form to materialized form, but the particularity in the general sphere would definitely give rise to the generality both in its view and in its material facts. In this way the transformation of the society form its earlier form to the newly and another form is based up on the complete factors and players of the particularities only, because the particularity alone has the participation, constant touch and complete knowledge with skill and their labor in the field of the particularity in the sphere of generality as it has the confidence over its subjects that mold them with commitment to take part in the work of particularity only. On the other hand the transformation and change in the particularity by any individual is depended upon its more than six factors what I can analyze them. Of them one is genetic effect and its influence on his mind to attract the work to be done by him through his participation in any stage of life of the individual in the field of particularity. Secondly the situational share in the participation in the specific field of particularity in any age of the individual on the scale of his regular activities in his life time due to having the aspirations of identification of himself or for existential apprehensions including his comfort for himself in his life. Third source is here to identify that his mind and his concept of achieving something in his life can entice him to take part in the cause of his will. Without having the will and interest in participating in the field of particularity for want of his need and his requirements having other subjects in mind may be the reason itself to form the transformation of the society as forth point in this way. Through the support of outsider in the particularity to what the individual required to be needed to do what he has intended to do is the fifth source of the transformation itself by its active factor. The last source as its fifth the particularity in the sphere of the generality by any individual, is that it emerges as new from its own contradictions of each particularity in the sphere of the generality. At the same time the generality alone cannot transform anything from any previous condition to the next state of its condition unless and until it has the direct relationship or indirect influence upon it while making it as to what is intended to be done by any individual in the society, family and in the state.
Ayub Mohammed
: http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/political_analysts/
[The Wounding Glory: The Historical Analysis Of The State, Society, Religion, Active Forces, Scientific Developments, And The People In The World
The Wounding Glory: The Historical Analysis Of The State, Society, Religion, Active Forces, Scientific Developments, And The People In The World
In a comparison of Indian civilization prior and during the rig Vedic period, with the civilizations of Egypt, Sumerian, Akkadian, Mesopotamian and Urr, the origin and complete form of the "state" in India there was no strong form of the state at the time. The complete form and shape of the state it was not yet taken while the Greeks king Dario us, and Alexander who took expedition of winning the territories of India under any Indian kings materially except in the form of Indian mythology which claims that the state was in origin and has taken its expansion from India to all parts of the world particularly in the gulf areas too, by keeping in mind the Vikramaditya the great king of that time whose period also stated to be corrupted with a contention to keep him above all the kings and their dynasties in the world. "God the invisible King" as the presumption has the relation with the kingship and the god whose role and act to save the people as a protector, savior and benevolent towards the poor in the world could be the factor behind the origin of the state in all the civilizations in materialistic way and in India the first god who has been well known in the Rig-Veda which is the first source of the history in India and its location of rig Vedic civilization is identified with the river Saraswati which was dried up. In rig Vedic kings list there were so many kings and whose actual physical proof not yet established in the sense and true meaning of material facts other than spiritual or mythological beliefs in India. Archaeological evidences in absence of which all these would never be treated as the kings in the history of the kings. However if it is established that all the kings were existed on the banks of five rivers by any authority either through the department of archaeology or by any credible research work it will become the believable facts and the facts in the space of mythology as the history of India with the list of kings. Hence the history of India in relation to the origin, evolution and taking complete shape of powerful state, foreign kings were took opportunity to rule the country for so many years and left their foot prints on the soils of India and it has its influence and affect on the common ideology of the people and has been played a part in molding the nature of the people of India since the period came to know to the history of the things and existence of the kings with the relation of the spirituality and mythology to the present form of the state in India. As Hegel claimed that the Egyptian and Indian gods has nearest relation in natural gods and the people of these two countries. After Dario us and Alexander the great, the first in terms of power and strength of its military might, the Chandragupta Mourya, basing on the capital city, Patna he has taken complete form of the state in India, before whom no one was come into being like him in India and much less in his power in small groups like a war lords were there in the tribal belts of the country and could not raise to his level in the might. The period of Rig Vedic civilization is stated to be existed around 1000-1500 BC. There is no unanimous opinion of the exact date of Vedic civilization in India. The period of Chandragupta Mourya is claimed to be 321-297 BC. As the first historical book, bible, in its Old Testament genesis, the king as claimed as the first king in the world is Enlil from Sumerian civilization which was around 3rd millennium. The Sumarian records also confirmed the kings list in which Enlil was the first king in the kings list. The names of the first kings and their kingships in comparison with the bible and Rig-Veda in the both mythological and archaeological accounts, whatever the evidences of the Rig-Veda and bible confirmed and convinced with the available findings it is here the facts in identifying the origin and transformation of the state to notify the developments and factors behind the state in different regions in the world. Language in which the bible is written first is Hebrew and the Rig-Veda is written in Sanskrit. It is the fact that the bible is the first book known for the subjects of origin of state, religion, and other issues in the history and it has been proving in so many subjects through the archaeological evidences since last two hundred years. Hence it is fact that the origin and its leading factors behind the origin of the state are very different from each other particularly in India from its early periods of the origin of the state in the Sumarian now modern Iraq, civilization. At the same time the form, need, leading factors, and the materialistic support behind the powerful state in iraq and in India is very different and do not have any direct link and same factors in all such origins of each state in all ancient civilizations in the world. At the same time, when the need and factors in leading the people to feel the need of the state and the social conditions of these societies are different and there is no unanimity in the features of all states in its early periods of its transformation from the nominal force to the powerful force in the shape of state particularly in India in comparison with other states' origin and transformation. There is the gap of at least 1000 years to 1500 years between the periods of states origin in these two civilizations in the world we can till now beleive because there are no such archaeological supports in reversing or altering the periods on the timeline of the world civilizations. For those in India whose mother tongue is other than Sanskrit language, the British who translated the four Vedas, including Rig-Veda, from to English are max Muller, and Griffith and they would be grateful to them for all time.
In the Indian history the most striking and positive feature is that the state has not been worked under any influence of the religion, particularly Hinduism, at the same time the Buddhism also did not allow the religion in the states affairs from the formation of the religion and the as identified in the Vedas, Upanishads and other historical books including Ramayana and Mahabharata. The Europeans, Romans and British who were during the middle ages allowed the church to dominate the state and decide the state affairs through the church in the society. The church-state relations were in the legalized form under the domination of the church over the state and its affairs whereas the temple in India to which few acres lands were allotted to run the affairs of the state in the mostly recognized form independence from each other. The Brahmans were only allowed in the occasions of the royal ceremonies and allowed them only to confine themselves in the service of the temple and people with some little gifts offered by the people on the name of god here in India. So the history and origin of the state in India is very different one from the other civilizations from which the state and religion took birth. So the history of India and the other states history is not same one and Indian history have a special attention to dig out and apply it to the present conditions of Indian society in order to find the exact phase of passage of society towards further advancement through identifying the pace and its pulse to confirm what stage we all Indians have to move towards progress and development including understanding the exact conditions of moving the other developed states to where exactly these have to reach through the progress and development in true sense and understanding of the stages of capitalism in the world. Ayub Mohammed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_analysts/
|
Bookmarks
Share
Save
[
