Join Free! | Login    
   Popular! Books, Stories, Articles, Poetry
Where Authors and Readers come together!


Featured Authors:  Wendy Laing, iGeorge Wallach, iJames Steffes, iMaria Daddino, iDarryl Jenkins, iTom Hyland, iDominic Caruso, i

  Home > Political Science > Articles Popular: Books, Stories, Articles, Poetry     

Farrell Winter

· + Follow Me
· Contact Me
· Articles
· Poetry
· Stories
· 12 Titles
· Save to My Library
· Share with Friends!
Member Since: Jan, 2008

Farrell Winter, click here to update your pages on AuthorsDen.

Featured Book
Self Publishing: Writing A Book and Publishing Books and eBo
by Bill Benitez

Complete and comprehensive instructions and screen shots on how to self publish books and ebooks...  
BookAds by Silver
Gold and Platinum Members

Primary Deceptions
by Farrell Winter   
Rated "PG" by the Author.
Last edited: Sunday, February 03, 2008
Posted: Sunday, February 03, 2008

  Print   Save    Follow    Share 

A brief consideration of the Iowa Caucus vote, and the continued unfitness for office of Hillary Clinton and of her politics-alike, Barack Obama.

Primary Deceptions


© 2008 Farrell Winter


How did Barack Obama come in first in the Iowa vote, and Hillary Clinton suffer a third-place win?  I believe it was because Iowans are less racist than they are misogynist.  There are black people in Iowa to be sure, and not all of them running from lynch mobs.  There are also women in Iowa, as there are everywhere else in the world.  Iowans, however, prefer their women dainty and feminine, not poor (make that rich) imitations of George W. Bush. 


Regarding Hillary’s reported moist-eyed campaigning in New Hampshire prior to the vote there, in the spirit of her comments on Gandhi in St. Louis:  “Hey Clinton, you still shedding crocodile tears up there in New Hampshire?”  Obviously not, since she came in first in that state. 


An interesting if minor side note:  someone claiming to be part of Mike Gravel’s campaign phoned CNN following the Iowa prayer circle – I mean vote – to say falsely that the former Senator had dropped out of the race.  Chris Dodd and Joe Biden, who did drop out, each received more votes than Gravel, who got no delegates at all.  Why didn’t someone likewise claim that Kucinich, who also got no delegates, dropped out as well? 


Is it because Kucinich will endorse the eventual Democratic nominee, while Gravel has hinted that he may not?  Is it because Kucinich has a future political career to consider, while Gravel at age 78 wants to leave a legacy behind?  In this case, the legacy of a national referendum process, empowering American citizens to make laws along with the Congress.  


Is it because Kucinich did not challenge Hillary’s vote for the Kyl-Lieberman Amendment, authorizing the U.S. to go to war with Iran, while Gravel did (and publicly at that)?  At this juncture, let us not forget the winner in Iowa.  Obama did not vote for this amendment.  In fact, he couldn’t be bothered to show up and vote at all, as has been his pattern.  However, he has previously expressed his support for using nuclear weapons against Iran – as has Edwards. 


As excellent as Kucinich is, he doesn’t describe the Iraq fiasco as Bush’s oil war, as Gravel does.  He does not speak of U.S. imperialism, as Gravel does.  Kucinich is the best of the worst, a tolerable fly in the ointment of Democratic Party business-as-usual.  Gravel represents a threat to this status quo. 


Has the Clinton juggernaut been stopped?  I don’t think so.  One of the few admirable qualities both Clintons seem to have is resilience, the ability to bounce back in the face of adversity.  Balancing this is a host of Hillary’s not-so-admirable qualities:  continued voting to fund the Iraq war while claiming to oppose it; support for nuclear power; support for subsidizing insurance companies rather than for single payer, universal health care; support for NAFTA; opposition to gay marriage. 


One would hope that rhetoric is no longer believed as it becomes more outlandish.  On the other hand, perhaps Goebbels was right:  Tell a big enough lie, for long enough, and the people will believe you.  Thus the result of Clinton’s New Hampshire “comeback.” 


Want to review or comment on this article?
Click here to login!

Need a FREE Reader Membership?
Click here for your Membership!

Popular Political Science Articles
  1. It’s Time to Reassess the Trump
  2. Reply to: Income Inequality Benefits Ever
  3. 10 Questions for All Presidential Candidat
  4. Social Security History
  5. The Sarah Palin Syndrome
  6. A l’attention de Jennifer Rene « Jen » Psa
  7. US commitment to Israel is unshakable
  8. Drowning out the Drums…Staying Motivated t
  9. La voie vers la paix
  10. Constitutional Amendment to end Corporate

Islamic Two-Headed Beast by Will Clark

Radical Islamists loudly proclaim they will destroy America - and Israel. Should we not believe them? Should we not stop their evil plans?..  
BookAds by Silver, Gold and Platinum Members

Denied 3 Times by Will Clark

A new book on the way describing a modern-day event prophesied over 2000 years ago. It begins with the three denials by Peter that he knew Jesus. Hopefully, I will have it complete..  
BookAds by Silver, Gold and Platinum Members

Authors alphabetically: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Featured Authors | New to AuthorsDen? | Add AuthorsDen to your Site
Share AD with your friends | Need Help? | About us

Problem with this page?   Report it to AuthorsDen
© AuthorsDen, Inc. All rights reserved.