by Regis Auffray
Rated "G" by the Author.
edited: Monday, April 16, 2012
Posted: Monday, April 16, 2012
Become a Fan
An article by Sha'Tara, local writer and friend.
[thoughts from ~burning woman~ by Sha'Tara]
When viewing movies, or reading stories about WWII, the one thing that sticks in the mind is the degree of racial hatred engendered at the time on a global scale. Not only the deadly anti-Semitism such as Hitler was able to stir up in the German people, but everywhere. Russian imperialism under the guise of Communism spread terror and bloodshed wherever it invaded as it pushed the Germans back and spread its empire. Racial-dominated horror brought upon conquered peoples under Japanese occupation, well, we'll never know the truth of that in this life. Nor will we ever know how much murder the Allies condoned among those they in turn conquered. And the carnage continues apace, in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine and all over the Arab world as the oil cartels and their banksters bleed those worlds to social stagnation, driving them into impotence, poverty and eventual death so they can continue to control a substance that, thanks largely to advertising, greedy consumers believe to be essential to their so-called good life.
The question in my mind, before I leave this planet is: what causes racial hatred? What can it be traced to? Why does it exist? Who benefits from this, if "benefit" of some kind is sought? If it is pure sociopathy, then where did Earthians acquire or learn this trait? Did they see it done, long ago in their hidden history or is it in their DNA? In their genes? If it is genetic then the "cause" of racial hatred must be sought in whatever is responsible for the "creation" of the Earthian creature. Racial hatred is a symptom of sociopathy, utterly insane and demands of us that we delve into this. Should we find a source for the problem and understand it, perhaps we could find a cure, or at least determine whether it is curable and what we should do if it is not.
Basic, simple research: The Bible, an ancient document itself based upon much older writings, plainly states in Genesis chapter 1 that, and quote:
Ge. 1:26 Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, [Hebrew; Syriac all the wild animals] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
Ge. 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.
Ge. 1:28 God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground.”
Ge. 1:29 Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.
Ge. 1:30 And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds of the air and all the creatures that move on the ground — everything that has the breath of life in it — I give every green plant for food.” And it was so.
While there are three salient points made in the above quote, I'll just deal with the one pertaining to the one that leads us back to the topic. We read that "God" created man in his own image, as male and female. We understand that "God" is not a physical entity, so what could it mean to be created in God's image; how do we interpret that? It can only mean that man was imprinted with the mind of God. This "image" is both spiritual and mental since it cannot be physical. This tells us certain things about ourselves which organized Religion has gone to great lengths to deny, to hide, to misinterpret: that "man" is like God in spirit and in mind. It seems obvious to me that since "man" displayed less than godly attributes, the "high priesthood" responsible to hide and re-format God's character had to invent some fairy tale whereby man's divine characteristics, or divine nature, would be spoiled, damaged, in some way so that God's own "image" could not be tied to man's performance. God had to remain untainted from evil, therefore any evil found in man, or for that matter in all of creation, would have to ORIGINATE from some other source. Enter the bogey man, the "arch-enemy" who is now known primarily as Satan, at least in Christian circles. The problem with that is obvious from the start: God is NOT the originator of everything! Someone else has attributes similar to God's, namely the ability to create something new from previously non-existent condition, source or material. If God is not the author of sin, then someone else must have the power to create such a condition because the condition definitely exists and has for a very long time.
Genesis chapter one is followed by another story of creation which basically contradicts the original and in its extended version makes itself a ridiculous appendage to the first version. Either they should have stuck with the original story in chapter one, or deleted chapter one to chapter two verse 3, and begun their "book" at Genesis chapter 2, verse 4 which begins thus:
Ge. 2:4 This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created. When the LORD God made the earth and the heavens —
Ge. 2:5 and no shrub of the field had yet appeared on the earth [Or land; also in verse 6] and no plant of the field had yet sprung up, for the LORD God had not sent rain on the earth [Or land; also in verse 6] and there was no man to work the ground,
Ge. 2:6 but streams [Or mist] came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground —
Ge. 2:7 the LORD God formed the man [The Hebrew for man (adam) sounds like and may be related to the Hebrew for ground (adamah); it is also the name Adam (see Gen. 2:20).] from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.
Ge. 2:8 Now the LORD God had planted a garden in the east, in Eden; and there he put the man he had formed.
Any serious student of the first 2 chapters of Genesis can't help but be amazed at the clarity of purpose in the original story (Gen. Chap. 1 to Chap. 2, vs. 3) and the hodge-podge lack of chronology and general weirdness of the following chapters. First to note is that the "God" of chapter one is now called "the LORD God" so that "God" now has a title as well as a description: he is a monarch, a ruler, of some kind. Chronology: This LORD God makes man BEFORE he makes plants, but by some miracle worthy of any omnipotent creator, he manages, without plants being yet in existence, to plant a garden in Eden and in that garden he put the adam (note that this is not a proper name but a description of some creature only and the subsequent "name" is taken from that description).
What I am trying to convey here is that "in the beginning" there is only "the LORD God" and there is only an "adam" and later on, an "eve" and no Satan, not yet. We are told however that something of global impact happens in the so-called garden of Eden. An interesting creature shows up and this part is worthy of a Harry Potter scene:
Ge. 3:1 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?”
Out of the blue a simple animal, a serpent or snake, displays an unusual characteristic: it is crafty and it can talk. A crafty, talking snake (which could also walk according to later comments) appears in God's own garden, and that snake for no stated reason, is opposed to God's plan for the man and woman. Characteristic of Scripture in general - and another less than subtle way to introduce a reason for global misogyny, the serpent goes after the woman to make her "disobey" God. Thousands of years later the false apostle Paul of Tarsus would say in one of his infamous letters,
1Ti. 2:14 And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.
1Ti. 2:15 But women [Greek: she] will be saved [Or restored] through childbearing — if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety.
(Interpret that any way you like, but what it is saying, in this "divinely inspired" comment is that a woman can be saved if she is married and bears children for her man. If not, tough luck lady: hell will be your abode.)
In attempting to hide its deliberate and gross deception, the Church - and Religion in general - reveals much truth to those who learn to read with an open mind and can "see" the fine print between the ads! Man's character is from the original implant, from his creator, no one else. Man did not invent his own evil nature, he inherited it, not from the adams and the eves who were the dumb slaves of the gods, but from the creator gods themselves, those who are, for the time being, carefully hidden behind reams of disinformation, forgotten history and the indescribable, if not impossible, entity called "God" which Religion invented and tirelessly foisted upon humanity.
If we would understand why Earthians LOVE violence, as shown by their acts throughout history and certainly in the present, we must delve into the past and discover that which "His Story" will not reveal. We must understand why collections of ancient writing such as could have been found in the library of Alexandria for example, were ordered destroyed by the Church. What reasoning was subsequently given for wholesale destruction of ancient libraries is of no consequence. What must be made known is that the Church and the governments it controlled or was in bed with considered such information inimical to the dogma and direction of this new global force arising from the moribund body of the Roman empire. That information had to be hidden or destroyed.
What information did these places contain that would be so damaging to the new "world-class" Religions of Christianity and later on, Islam and the empires they spawned to exploit, desecrate, pollute and rape the planet and the people? Likely papyrus copies of ancient Sumerian clay tablet writings which only recently have begun to be unearthed, catalogued and translated and which clearly state that "man" was a cloned creature made to serve as a slave for a race of creator "gods" known as the Anunnaki. Traces of such "gods" having been here are all over the planet in monuments of stone of such weight and aligned with such accuracy that no modern technology can yet touch. The most famous, of course, is the great pyramid. There is so much "in your face" or prima facie evidence of extra-terrestrial intelligent space-faring beings here despite the indiscriminate destruction of information about them, why is it not commonly known and accepted? It's all a matter of carefully orchestrated endless propaganda stacked against that undeniable evidence, which still takes the day. It can be said that the leadership of this planet is in agreement and collusion on at least this one thing: that the people must never know the truth of their origins and if they hear it, they must never be allowed to believe it.
If it were known and accepted that "we" are the descendents of cloned beings deliberately dummied down to serve as slaves for ruling elites, what would that do to the fairy tale of a benign all-powerful, all knowing, absolute love "God" that has worked so well for so long despite all evidence to the contrary? What would it do to religion, to government, to masters, to any elitist apparatus if Earthians were to discover that their evil nature is inherited, not chosen? If they realized that sociopathy was a main trait of their creator "gods" and that they were the ones who introduced all the evils we know to this world, including and especially, the greatest evils of all: racial hatred, misogyny and war! If they realized that it is the greatest sociopaths among them who always gravitate to positions of power over others.
One may ask, why racial hatred? Weren't the Anunnaki's all of one clan? An interesting question, and one that has not been asked by those who study that hidden history. But if we use the rule, "As below, so above" we can easily understand this: that the Anunnaki invasion of earth had more than one source and happened many times in history. If the A's came from one planet, likely the one called Nibiru, then there would be competing groups, clans, families, nations and empires on that planet exactly the same as was imprinted on earth: simple deduction. If we accept that possibility, and it is certainly quite plausible, it becomes obvious that competing groups sent their "discoverers" to claim portions of earth and in each enclave, a cloning program would be implemented to make slaves for the plundering of the planet. If Nibiru had different and competing races, it stands to reason that the cloned beings in, say, southern Africa would be different than cloned beings in the Middle East, in Mexico or in China or Japan. Each invading race would clone slaves from itself in its own image.
Let's try this: in the beginning (but allowing for a great many "beginnings" all over the planet) all rulers and overseers would be Anunnaki (or "Nibiruans" if you will) and all the slaves would be Earthian. In time however, some Earthians whose blood became mixed with the A's due to intercourse between Earthian females and Anunnaki masters (attested to by the Bible, no less, and quote from Genesis chapter 6: )
Ge. 6:1 When men began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them,
Ge. 6:2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. [...]
Ge. 6:4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days — and also afterwards — when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them.
gained positions of authority over their own peoples. These were called "Nephilim" in the old tongue and they were also referred to as "blue bloods" because in all likelihood the "gods" had bluish-tinged blood whereas earth creatures were red-blooded. Hence why true royals and hereditary rulers, nobility and the aristocracy were always known as blue bloods. The dictionary notes that the antonym for blue blood is citizen, commoner, proletarian. Does that clarify things a bit? I'll throw this one in for free: the most interesting "Nephilim" to make his mark on earth was Jesus of Nazareth. As stated in the Bible, he was the son of "God" born of a "divinely" impregnated virgin Earthian woman.
So, a bit of hidden history and here we are: while the elites of the day no longer appear to be Anunnaki or Nibiruan space-faring "gods" there is a pattern established. Their descendants and descendants of the Nephilim continue to rule here. This explains why Earthian rulers can be certifiable, and usually are, yet are supported, voted for, feared, cheered, believed... and if they are cursed and mocked, such is done in non-threatening ways and allowed as a general rule to let out steam. Earthians still bear the mark of their ownership by, and slavery to, rulers and authorities. They fear a world where they would be free to choose how to deal with each other on their own. They trust overt sociopathic leadership while distrusting and fearing their neighbor. That's the programming; that's the problem, and that's why nothing ever changes here.
If the problem of racial hatred, of misogyny, of "sin" and evil conduct is indeed genetic and not learned behaviour, is their a cure then? If there is, what could that be, since everything ever offered by teachers and outstandingly good individuals has failed to make a dent in this problem since pre-diluvial times?
Web Site: AuthorsDen
Want to review or comment on this article?
Click here to login!
Need a FREE Reader Membership?
Click here for your Membership!
|Reviewed by Tom Hyland
|REGIS & SHA'TARA ... AS ALWAYS - THOUGHT PROVOKING ...
However, at age 71, had only heard or read the term 'Annunnaki' maybe once, decades ago. Had to 'GOOGLE' it. i believe the KEY word is 'MYTH'.
Seems each & every varied Civilization, or Culture, of whatever Age or Time, had to ATTEMPT to explain its own Existence somehow ... ERGO, each 'invented' or 'created' a Mythology of its supposed 'Origins' - Gods, Titans, gods, Extra-Terrestials, Aliens ... et cetera ... Ancient Greek Mythology, Ancient Roman Mythology, Ancient Sumerian Mythology, Ancient Egyptian Mythology, Ancient Babylonian Mythology ... and on, and on, and on ... Millenniums later reaching MONO-THEISM.
When I was a mere lad of 17, an older Gentleman, my Friend Lonnie's Grand-Father, Mr. Fischer told us: "RELIGION IS A SUPERSTITION CREATED BY MAN, IN ORDER TO EXPLAIN HIS OWN EXISTENCE!"
PER WIKIPEDIA ... PASTE HERE ...
"The Anunnaki appear in the Babylonian creation myth, Enuma Elish. In the late version magnifying Marduk, after the creation of mankind, Marduk divides the Anunnaki and assigns them to their proper stations, three hundred in heaven, three hundred on the earth. In gratitude, the Anunnaki, the "Great Gods", built Esagila, the splendid: "They raised high the head of Esagila equaling Apsu. Having built a stage-tower as high as Apsu, they set up in it an abode for Marduk, Enlil, Ea." Then they built their own shrines.
According to later Assyrian and Babylonian myth, the Anunnaki were the children of Anu and Ki, brother and sister gods, themselves the children of Anshar and Kishar (Skypivot and Earthpivot, the Celestial poles), who in turn were the children of Lahamu and Lahmu ("the muddy ones"), names given to the gatekeepers of the Abzu temple at Eridu, the site at which the creation was thought to have occurred. Finally, Lahamu and Lahmu were the children of Tiamat (Goddess of the Ocean) and Abzu (God of Fresh Water).
The length of time "40 days" is used in antiquity when an unknown amount of time has passed. eg. It rained for 40 days and 40 nights."
RATHER THAN 'RACIAL HATRED' AND/OR 'MISOGYNY' (hatred of Women) ... I would suggest the word 'MISOLOGY' - THE HATRED OF REASON, LOGICAL ARGUMENT, OR ENLIGHTENMENT ...
At the risk of being 'crude' or 'gross' - to me MYTHOLOGY is really 'HORSE-SHIT'!
Accordingly, I have to 'SIDE' with Ron's comments!
PAL ... Peace - Abundance - Love ... Tom.
|Reviewed by Janna Hill
|Enmity between seed, divisive nature, hatred taught. They are all alive and well. The answer lies with individuals.
Thank you Reg
|Reviewed by Patrick Granfors
|People are animals and biologically programmed to live in packs. Some packs are stronger or more clever, but all contain the survival programming that somehow allows us to overlook the higher functions. Patrick|
|Reviewed by JASMIN HORST SEILER
|Does it not say, somewhere in the book, God also created evil, ,,, check it out Regis, in my mind, fear of the Gods, fear, is the real evil, for it is out of that fear we act, cowardness, to be who we truly could be, fear of death!!! Bless ya!|
|Reviewed by Ronald Hull
|I guess I am the only one to disagree. You are right about various religions destroying earlier myths to proselytize their own. However, evil behavior has been well explained in books like "The Selfish Gene" and "The Territorial Imperative" and have nothing to do with religious belief, in spite of religion's efforts to claim control.
Searching ancient artifacts and writings does uncover many strange things from the imagination of the human mind, such as gods, dragons, sea serpents, giants, and the like, but there is no evidence of space travelers except in the mind. Recent studies of the other intelligent species, like chimpanzees (cannibalism) and animal groups with alpha males who do all the breeding or alpha females who select their sexual partners and control entire groups of their kind duplicate human behavior in remarkable ways.
You can believe in space aliens, ghosts, big foot, or nessie if you like, just like religions believe in father, son, holy ghost and innumerable variations of mind control in books, movies, and tv shows, but I believe we have been brutally surviving animals for eons, naturally sexually attracted to others totally unlike us (a natural survival trait--strengthening the gene pool) and fully capable of sorting fact from fiction if we just throw out our myths and start to understand each other.
Most racial characteristics in humans are clearly the result of many adaptations to climate, not the creation of any god or extraterrestrial in his or her own image.
|Reviewed by Jon Willey
|the roots of hatred are many and deep within mankind - understanding is the key to unlocking the doors of gated divisiveness -- great article Regis thanks for sharing - I wish you love and peace my dear friend - Jon Michael|
|Reviewed by Diana Wiles
|An excellent in depth article...Thank you...|
|Reviewed by Paul Berube
|Great article, Regis. Relevant and very well written.|
|Reviewed by Lonnie Hicks
|Wow. Very thoughtful piece and I learned a lot from it. Thanks for writing this.|
|Reviewed by Mary Ann Biddinger
|Outstanding article Regis. Thank you for your insights.
Lady Mary Ann
|Reviewed by Vivian Dawson
|I believe that a person's worth
is earned regardless of race/origin (.)
*Regis* thank you for addressing this matter!!!
|Reviewed by Jane Noponen Perinacci
|Everything you say is true! I've often wondered why some people harbor racial hatred myself! I believe it is handed down by elders of some families. Very good article!!! Bravo!!|