Join Free! | Login    
   Popular! Books, Stories, Articles, Poetry
Where Authors and Readers come together!


Featured Authors:  Hugh McCracken, iP. G. Shriver, iPhillip Rice, iDoug Boren, irichard cederberg, ijude forese, iLinda Frank, i

  Home > Internet > Articles Popular: Books, Stories, Articles, Poetry     

Barie Fez-Barringten

· + Follow Me
· Contact Me
· Success story
· Books
· Articles
· Poetry
· Stories
· Blog
· 81 Titles
· 7 Reviews
· Save to My Library
· Share with Friends!
Member Since: Mar, 2006

Barie Fez-Barringten, click here to update your pages on AuthorsDen.

Featured Book
Bridging the Gap: Police - Japanese, Third Edition
by Robert Wood

Nonverbal Japanese language communicator primarily for English speakers. Easy to use reference. Proven and effective tool...  
BookAds by Silver
Gold and Platinum Members

Artificial Intelligence Design Metaphor
by Barie Fez-Barringten   
Rated "G" by the Author.
Last edited: Tuesday, October 09, 2012
Posted: Monday, July 23, 2012

  Print   Save    Follow    Share 

Recent articles by
Barie Fez-Barringten

Metaphors, architecture and music
Relations between metaphors, creative thinking and 3D structures ©
The Six Principles of Art’s & Architecture’s Technical and Conceptual M
Architecture is an art because, as art, it too, makes metaphors
Linguistic, psychological, and cognitive sciences:architecture:metaphors
Metaphoric axioms for micro disciplinary architecture
Metaphor issues of architecture is art stasis
           >> View all

As AI and architecture mediate and control their mutual interactions metaphoric axioms will have cognitive impact on both the future of architecture and AI because there is common metaphor between natural (NI) and artificial intelligence (AI). The inference warrants that for both architectures’ (AI and building) , master builder is an interdisciplinary, multi-crafted and multi-venue team, They are also both arts since they wed intentional ideas to craft and they both make metaphors, the commonality to all the arts. While “architect” actually means master builder and “architecture” the product of the master builder, this is historically identified with habitable buildings. The warrant to the inference of the resolution is that the computer industries (and virtual designers) have made a metaphor referring to the word “architecture” with its conceptual design and fundamental operational structures of computer systems. Already, IT and AI industry metaphorically compare their sciences and art of selecting and interconnecting hardware components to create computers that meet functional, performance and cost goals with the ways and means traditional architects design buildings. There is an interconectivity between the metaphor of computer’s instruction set architecture, or ISA, machine language (or assembly language), Microarchitecture and system design.

Theoretically, I warrant that the as the body and mind of AI has identified itself with “architecture” there is an opportunity to use those links to apply and manage risks of AI to building architecture. However, benign, risks include operating system downtime, programming errors, inaccuracy in labeling and dimensions, misreading building codes, local ordinances, misinterpreting FEMA regulations and potential tampering with building security systems. . Further risks include erroneous selection of material and building systems that may expose architects to errors and omissions suits, so many of the general and specific axioms guidelines can be uploaded into the AI architectural system. So with AI potential risk [ff] what can be the impact of artificial intelligence on the future of building architecture?

Because artificial intelligence is inherently axiomatic, interdisciplinary [aa] and metaphoric it is uniquely suited to combine risk management and building architecture. Metaphoric axioms improve AI’s and architecture’s interactions by likening it to architecture. As AI architecture, the “strange” of AI becomes linked to the “familiar” architecture and the two can be compared: AI and architecture, they both can benefit from a metaphoric vocabulary. As most AI/IT activities, they work through digital and mechanical devices, mainframes, hard drives, processors, motherboards and chips, as well as application software, firmware, middleware, (which controls and co-ordinates distributed systems) , and system software (such as operating systems) , which interface with hardware to provide the necessary services for application software, these are all the body to the brain of AI. To warrant my claim as other disciplines these bodies are driven by some form of axioms (structured vocabulary) however, about AI architectural work, there is presently little in the way of axioms. Historically, in the early eighties, Silicone Valley data companies (I consulted such companies in Sunnyvale between 1979 and 1981) scoured the market for soft information to build proposed programs for computer aided design (CAD) intended to be driven by design professionals to actually lay down graphic images instead of hand drafted (pencil on paper) drawings. Having put traditional draftsman out of the loop, and, developed “master specs” for computerized specifications, the next step is now to reduce the expense of design personal and extend the design capability and capacity. Thirty years later the design industry claims that what can be done for the design of manufacturing plants, machine parts and assemblies may be applicable to creating communities, environments, developments and specific buildings. The resolution’s presumed context is that it is not just limited to information technology (IT) but a presumption of intelligence assuming man can make something which can think for itself as today’s computer games, medical procedures, aircraft and military devices The below examples show that when programmed, systems can make judgments in a strange environment and metaphorically make the strange familiar (metaphorically) and systematically design buildings. (Where design is intentionally originating and developing a plan for a product, structure, system, or component). The impact of artificial intelligence on the future of architecture: practice, process and products are that today there are “smart buildings” with internal mechanical and electrical systems that respond to the specific behavioral patterns of occupants. Below you will find potentials for the use of metaphoric architectural axioms where artificial intelligence examples have been applied to designing buildings without necessarily acting as an “architect”, where design is only one architectural function. No more than would we have diagnostic equipment and robotics perform sovereign surgery on a doctor’s patient. Currently all other systems use protocols, parameters and axiomatic frameworks, axioms and guidelines needed to facilitate artificial diagnostics, analysis, and design of buildings at one or another level is the impact of artificial intelligence on the future of architecture. To complete the case for the resolution that AI’s and architecture’s mutual interactions will be improved and managed risks [ff] by metaphoric axioms I have provided a short summary of the claims and examples a of the 83 axioms I have authored in another much longer monograph [T]. Leaving those details of all the axioms for another essay suffice it to say that these axioms are essential drivers of AI architectural activities. As a predicate this AI system can be used by the architectural profession to expand its use of metaphors and services to manage the design process by interfacing with clients, society, culture, contactors and building authorities and finally selecting the appropriate axioms and managing the overall design process [aa]. These architectural metaphoric axioms will have an impact on the future of AI and building architecture. Since a host for the architectural metaphoric axioms is needed I warrant my inference that even today’s architectural practice has changed, communicating between many disciplines via the internet. “The availability of reliable, high-speed electronic connectivity enabled collaborative design team’s function irrespective of physical distance. [V] This calls for new type of design and simulation environment—one that facilitates automated searching and locating of satisfying and optimizing parts, integration of selected parts in an assembly, and simulation of the overall design that is distributed over the Internet”. An increasing quantity of building applications of AI work is based on [W] “Building Information Modeling (BIM) generating and managing building data during its life cycle”. AI neither promises uncontrolled sovereign operations, inventions, creativity, and innovative design but instead it promises to operate within the parameters and limits designed by man and if it could innovate, invent and create it would only do so with either specific geometry or geometric axioms. However said, Science fiction writers extrapolate the potential of AI beings aimed at ultimately destroying their creators. This metaphor to Frankenstein is to our culture as intimidating as is other unsavory results of cloning. Examples to the inferences where already industrial design for automobiles, aircraft and boats use design applications to meet aerodynamic, seismic, wind, structural loads, etc. These already account for the strength of materials, if given, or can optimally select materials based on its library of manufactured products. In addition [U] virtual building environments (VBE) are now producing graphic scenarios to estimate, plan, buy and build; already artificial intelligence is having an impact of on the future of architecture Examples and concerns applying AI to building design. Without concerns for risks the practical and the esoteric applications of AI to the built environment is often the result of metaphoric inventive processes, shocks and imaginative invention such as [M] ANTS which is an innovative example of an AI application to design buildings. “The Autonomic Nanotechnology Swarm (ANTS) is a generic mission architecture consisting of miniaturized, autonomous, self-similar, reconfigurable, addressable components forming structures. The components/structures have wide spatial distribution and multi-level organization. This ‘swarm’ (metaphor) behavior is inspired (metaphoric association) by the success of social insect colonies where within their specialties, individuals outperform generalists and with sufficiently efficient social interaction and coordination, groups of specialists outperform groups of generalists. [M] (Multi-disciplinary) Axiomatically, the type of information that is preserved in the traditional built environment is organized-complexity: precisely the type of information that defines living systems themselves. Thus, the traditional built environment consists of evolved and discovered solutions (schemata) that make our life easier and more meaningful” [N]. That having been said as ACTS combines design and construction “Research in construction automation at the University of Reading led to the formulation of a computer-integrated, component-based construction system. [Q} The Reading Building System was rationalized for automation following a systematic study of the construction processes involved in the design and erection of a variety of building types, especially high-tech offices. Computer-aided design (CAD) packages were written that used Parts Set components as primitives and that offered flexibility in design that was so often lacking in earlier approaches to system building. At the same time, a family of automation aids was developed to manipulate the parts that were modeled in the CAD In the Netherlands [S] “Artificial Design focuses on the application in architecture and design of the algorithmic approach to art being developed at the Institute of Artificial Art Amsterdam. Once a style has been defined the tool can suggest any desired number of alternative designs for a given document. The Department of Artificial Architecture develops programs which generate random specifications of 3-dimensional objects. Each of these programs employs a "visual grammar" to define an infinite set of structures, and then draws random samples from this space”. “The science of design usually conceives of AI as a set of tools for structuring the process, or planning, or optimizing. [R] This further warrants that “ Rarely does the computer explore a space of designs, and in doing so, it is generally following a set of precise rules, so the machine is doing little else than repeating a series of mechanical steps, faster than a human could. Creativity is usually considered to lie outside the realm of what computers can do”. Evolutionary Design (ED), the creation of designs by computers using evolutionary methods is a new research area with an enormous potential”. To manage some of the risk [ff] using existing metaphoric architectural axioms manufactured buildings, pre-engineered steel buildings, mobile homes, decks, kitchens, lighting, structures which are just some of the examples of pre-designed programs allows user to input variables to receive a design result. There are both similarities and differences between human natural intelligence and artificial intelligence which are metaphorically associated with the concerns of people and their aspirations to shape the post-industrial society. Metaphorical fears that people and not machines shape society adopted from the critics of the industrial and information revolution. In a way this is risk mitigation by reducing adopting metaphors that make the strange familiar and limit the unknowns. However, on closer examination, reality and fiction are different since artificial intelligence is authored by humans (the imagined fear is that what was created by man could turn against man when the AI capability to design, redesign and rebuild goes awry). Especially in building design, I argue that since there is a difference between the imagined, possible the reality of the probable is marginal, isolated, miniscule and therefore contained. The challenge to the AI community is to contain runaway metaphorical thinking, where the public looks to close down human capacity for social innovation and sustainability.[5] Military, design, engineering, accounting, medical, scientific, manufacturing and education are just some of the fields already augmenting artificial intelligence with human management. As AI, Metaphor is one of the tools of a [1] 'knowledge society' and to 'human-centered' technologies and systems. One the attributes of anything artificial is that it is stagnant, engrafted and reflective of its creator, it does not have its own free will at least not that beyond what has been given by its designers. While humans change and adopt the artificial remains as it was unless it also has the ability to rebuild, adopt and change. This scope, range and amplitude of this capacity are likewise conditioned by its creator. Like a work of architecture, machine, weapons and medical equipment, self analysis, reprogramming and change are built-in. Dividing the discipline's metaphors between technical [hh] and conceptual can improve AI’s and architecture’s mutual interactions. The brain can be simulated. Hans Moravec, Ray Kurzweil and others have argued that it is technologically feasible to copy the brain directly into hardware and software, and that such a simulation will be essentially identical to the original. [K] "The appropriately programmed computer with the right inputs and outputs would thereby have a mind in exactly the same sense human beings have minds. Searle counters this assertion with his Chinese room argument, which asks us to look inside the computer and try to find where the "mind" might be. The resolution to my claims is that AI’s and architecture’s mutual interactions will be improved by metaphoric axioms is supported by claims, inferences and warrants as AI’s and architecture’s mutual interactions will not only manage marginal risks but be improved by metaphoric axioms which will have an impact on the future of architecture and AI field. Philosophers and scientists concerned with ethics, morals and sociopolitical agreements critically challenge [J] the limits of intelligent machines while proponents of architectural metaphoric axioms recreate the capabilities of the human mind. These philosophers and scientists question if there is an essential difference between human intelligence and artificial intelligence. They wonder can a machine have a mind and consciousness. There is already a difference in perception between scholars and practitioners. Since both humans and machines perceive their environment and take actions they maximize their chances of success and manage risks while they likewise wonder if machines have a similar human capacity and capability to discern metaphors. “The field (artificial intelligence) was founded on the claim that a central property of humans, intelligence—the sapience of Homo sapiens—can be so precisely described that it can be simulated by a machine.[2] Can the artificial find the range of unpredictable, whimsical, and historical stored in the human be replicated. While for one it may be replicated but what about the trillions of other possibilities and potentials in humans not inherent in the artificial, as man, so does AI manage risks. [3] “Roughly speaking, AI is the attempt by computer scientists to model or simulate intelligent behavior on computers” This in and of itself is metaphoric, where one thing is stated in terms of the other. The intelligent behavior is the commonplace/commonality to both the human and the machine. We seem to want to make machines like us because we are the commonality. If we cannot clone mankind we can clone our body similar to the ancients who strove to be immortalized and as man so does AI manage risks. The mind-machine metaphor, central to AI, appears in jurisprudence as well. Sometimes it is explicit, as in Jerome Frank's image of the judicial slot machine: Judging is seen as a process wherein cases are fed into the hopper of the machine, a crank is turned, and justice is dispensed at the output. [3] The field of artificial intelligence is interesting to a student of metaphor, because it was explicitly founded upon a metaphor - several of them, in fact. In the 1950s, a group of scientists decided to try to provide the computer with intelligence. Their goal seemed attainable due to a common metaphorical identification of the computer with a brain. [4] From their efforts emerged the field of artificial intelligence, or AI. As I thought about the basic, or root metaphors of AI, I realized that they took a form resembling a classical syllogism, a mode of argument that forms the core of the body of Western logical thought. Aristotle defined syllogistic logic, and his formulations were thought to be the final word in logic; they underwent only minor revisions in the subsequent 2,200 years: one of the axioms driving the relationship is that the computer is a brain, the premise in a syllogism containing the minor term, which will form the subject of the conclusion. “Thinking is computing, [Y] concluding that if we provide the computer with sophisticated programs, it will develop a mind similar to human minds. [4], in risk free circumstances. Artificial systems and the biological ones are similar for their dynamicity, because they cope with the new situations in a way that is controlled and creative at the same time. [H]. In the case of architectural design this can only leads to safer, healthier and “greener’ buildings. [5] There is a body of study comparing AI to metaphors as I did in 1967 comparing architecture to metaphors. [C]. There is ample discussions on the analogies, symbolisms and metaphors linking machines and minds, computers and humans , and artificial intelligence with natural intelligence it is therefore beneficial to apply the science, claims and axioms about metaphors. [D]. But what about axioms derived by social, psychological, philosophical, cognitive scientist? In other works [T] I have derived 83 axioms which I could apply both here have only discussed the ones with major comparative value. As they did with AI we did with architecture and are using these axioms and findings to compare human and machines. For example [7] humans are able to generate metaphors by describing an operation in an unfamiliar way and thus able to make what was already somewhat known dominant. The generative metaphor is the name for a process of symptoms of a particular kind of seeing-as, the “meta-pherein” or “carrying –over” of frames or perspectives from one domain of experience to another. This process he calls generative which many years earlier WJ Gordon called the Metaphoric Way of Knowing [E] and 2.1 Paul Weiss called “associations” [F]. Both humans and computers can generate dead metaphors where one really does not contain any fresh metaphor insofar as it does not really “get thoughts across”; [8] “language seems rather to help one person to construct out of his own stock of mental stuff something like a replica, or copy, of someone’s else’s thoughts”. Man’s natural culture is a product of man-made, unnatural things, that instead of culture shaping the computer it is the computer (artificial intelligence) that shapes the culture. At first, culture creates the machines then the artificial intelligence modifies the culture. Then new modified culture creates new machines, etc. [9] The affect of the metaphor on other metaphors with all its links and consequences is manifest in the conduit [8] which leads to one after the other and a continuation of the first. On the one hand AI can result in prescriptive design vs. abnormal, different, irregular, occasional, rare, sometime, and unusual design solutions with such projects as CFS truss system[cc], Arup/cultural society[ee] and emergence [ee]. Emergence [ee] is an important new concept in artificial intelligence, information theory, digital technology, economics, climate studies, material science and biometric engineering. It is a development which is set to inform not only the construction of buildings, but also the composition of new materials. As a new science, coupled with material and technological innovations, it is set to enter architecture into a new phase of transition including new material processes and technologies that enable the production of complex architectural forms and effects. Mathematics of emergence underlies advanced manufacturing processes, how it is incorporated in the design process by scientists developing new materials, by mass market and niche product manufacturers, by engineers and by architects. The new science demands new strategies for design, strategies that have a remarkable similarity to the evolutionary design development and optimization processes of nature. It involves the intersection of a broad scope of disciplines including advanced structural and biomimetic engineering, the mathematics of morphogenesis and computer science with particular respect to artificial life and evolutionary computation, in order to set forth an operative notion of emergence for architectural design [aa] . Axiom Digest Within the parameters of risk management [ff] these axioms are self-evident principles that can be accepted on face-value as a true basis for argument since they have already been proven and described by the noted referent for each. Here they are postulates (or inferences) without their warrants. As such each is noted as to source and location for reference gleaned from “Metaphor and Thought” [6] (footnoted as 1._._ throughout).There are additional references noted below. The footnotes are sub-axioms meant to both support the axiom while also being useful as an independent principle. The below axioms are predominantly derived from “Metaphors and Thought” [6] by Andrew Ortony, earlier mentoring by Dr. Paul Weiss and are in addition to over forty years of work about my stasis to architecture as art being that “architecture as the making of metaphors” (please see background [C] below after the monograph for your information). Axioms are self-evident principles that I have deduced out of Ortony’s Metaphor and Thought [6] and accept as true without proof as the basis for future arguments; a postulates or inferences including their warrants (which I have footnoted as 1._._ throughout). These axioms are in themselves clarification, enlightenment, and illumination removing ambiguity where the derivative reference (Ortony) has many applications. Hopefully, these can be starting points from which other statements can be logically derived. Unlike theorems, axioms cannot be derived by principles of deduction as I wrote: "The metametaphor theorem" published by Architectural Scientific Journal, Vol. No. 8; 1994 Beirut Arab University. [gg] The below axioms define properties for the domain of a specific theory which eve loved out of the stasis defending architecture as an art and in that sense, a "postulate” and "assumption" . Thusly, I presume to axiomatize a system of knowledge to show that these claims can be derived from a small, well-understood set of sentences (the axioms). “Universality, Global uniqueness, Sameness, Identity, and Identity abuse” are just some of the axioms of web architecture. Francis Hsu of Rutgers writes that “Software Architecture Axioms is a worthy goal. First, let's be clear that software axioms are not necessarily mathematical in nature”. Furthermore, in his book titled The Book of Architecture Axioms Gavin Terrill wrote: “Simplify essential complexity; diminish accidental complexity; You're negotiating more often than you think ;It's never too early to think about performance and resiliency testing; Fight repetition; Don't Control, but Observe and Architect as Janitor”. In “Axiomatic design in the customizing home building industry published by Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management; 2002;vol 9; issue 4;page 318-324 Kurt Psilander wrote that “the developer would find a tool very useful that systematically and reliably analyses customer taste in terms of functional requirements (FRs). Such a tool increases the reliability of the procedure the entrepreneur applies to chisel out a concrete project description based on a vision of the tastes of a specific group of customers. It also ensures that future agents do not distort the developer's specified FRs when design parameters are selected for the realization of the project. Axiomatic design is one method to support such a procedure. This tool was developed for the manufacturing industry but is applied here in the housing sector. Some hypothetical examples are presented”. Aside from building-architect’s axioms claiming that “form follows function”; “follow manufacturer’s requirements and local codes and ordinances”, “AIA standards for professional practice” architectural axioms are few and far between. Each has been summarized, paraphrased and translated into architectural terms. Because of the speed and memory capacity it is not far fetched that an AI architectural system could receive, analyze and match requirements with codes, ordinances and industry standards which will impact the future of both building and AI architecture. Compendium of Axioms The first axiom permits all the others in that it claims that ideas and concepts are the reality of what we create. These images are also the commonality linking our impression with facts on the ground. [10] Novel images and image metaphors are conceptual and not the works themselves, but their mental images. “All metaphors are invariant with respect to their cognitive topology, that is, each metaphorical mapping preserves image-schema structure:” Likewise when we look at the geometrical formal parts of an AI architectural metaphor we note those common elements where fit, coupling and joints occur. We remember that which exemplified the analogous match. This observation of the metaphor finds that the commonality, commonplace and similarity are the chief focus of the metaphor. Humans and mechanized readers both may note either the obscure or subtle as the way two horizontal axes of the land and then a building are wed by their commonality of horizontality affecting the future of both architectures. Natural Intelligence (NI) and AI note the 90 degree angles and shape that slide into one another. AI and NI and note the way like metals, clips and angles fit; the way ceiling ducts are made to fit between structures and hung ceiling, etc. While it is less possible for AI to spontaneously imagine the way AI could relate the human form to a building when humans circulate through its halls, rooms and closets its accommodation to our needs and necessities; to our self preservation and the maintenance of the building become apparent. Both can map the building structure to humans by finding the one commonality amongst all the others. Very often we will hear someone (user) say this place is” me”. The common image has been located and the fit made. The way to arrive at generic-level schemes for some knowledge structure is to extract its image; its image-schematic structure is the Invariance Principle. Obviously this is best done by architecture’s human inhabitant; this is called the Generic’s Specific Structure. It is an extremely common mechanism for comprehending the general from the specific. So what you can deduce for part you can assume is true of the whole. The human architect controls the mechanical and artificial; however, they both must share their intelligence where the artificial analyses and presents it findings to man for further action. Whether a human can preprogram an AI devise to perceive the infinite number of human “fit” characteristics seems formidable. As today, much depends on the return on investment and the capacity of creators to program the device, the programmer, scientist and operator will only do what is efficient and necessary. You may call it the biggest bang for the buck axiom, where humans may falter and awake to a new paradigm where AI devices are designed to always succeed. It is any of the three levels of [aa] Axioms contextual forms. Plausible accounts [10] rather than scientific results are why we have conventional metaphors and why conceptual systems contain a preference for one set of metaphorical mappings over another. An artificial intelligence establishes its own vocabulary which once comprehended become the way in which we experience its’ product’s finding. Its discrepancies and fits seek the first and all the other similar elements while humans judge consistency, integrity and aesthetics of AI. The two have their respective roles. The human monitors, manages and controls wile the AI system performs anticipated intelligent operations leaving the human to find variances and reprogram. In this way AI in general and the application in particular evolves and impacts both architectures Metaphor is the main mechanism through which humans comprehend abstract concepts and perform abstract reasoning. Whether it is one or thousands public cultures is influenced, bound and authenticated by its’ metaphors. Not withstanding “idolatry” the metaphors are the contexts of life’s dramas and as our physical bodies are read by our neighbors finding evidence for inferences about social, political and philosophical claims about our culture and its place in the universe. For humans much subject matter, from the most mundane to the most abstruse scientific theories, can only be comprehended via metaphor However, AI capacity is limited only by its microprocessor chips and RAM. Metaphor is fundamentally conceptual, not linguistic, in nature. Human’s free will, whim, natural functions and being the original indigenous native inhabitants characterize man over his artificial creations. Left to its own AI would create a world of possible machine parts, systems and structures well suited for artificial intelligent life. Metaphorical language is a surface manifestation of conceptual metaphor. As language is to speech so is output to AI where each has a content and inner meaning of the whole as well as each of its parts. As each word, each attachment, plain, material, structure had first been conceived to achieve some purpose and fill some need. Hidden from the reader is the inner psychology, social background, etc of the man when speaking and the programming deign and contacting process from the reader of a building metaphor. As in completing an argument the reader perceives the inferences with its warrants and connects the evidence of the seen to the claims to make the resolution of the whole, all of which are surmised from the surface. Though much of our conceptual system is metaphorical a significant part of it is non-metaphorical. Metaphorical understanding is grounded in non-metaphorical understanding. AI is well suited to the architectural science of the strength of materials, mathematics, structures, indeterminate beams, truss design, mechanical systems, plumbing systems, electricity, cladding, finishes, lighting, etc. as are each understood metaphorically and their precepts applied metaphorically. But often random selections, trials and feasibility are random and rather in search of the metaphor without knowing whether it is or is not a metaphor and fit to be part of the metaphor at hand. AI will not know the relevant commonality. It may select some commonality but chances are it will be irrelevant and as incongruous as often are language translations selecting incongruous phrases and usages. It is for such a risk that human management and monitoring may be required. On the other hand we may select one or another based on non-metaphorical, empirical test and descriptions of properties. We then try to understand the metaphor in the selection, its commonality, how it contributes to the new application, how it has properties within itself which are alone strange and unrelated yet when coupled with the whole or part of the created metaphor contributes to metaphor. Metaphor allows humans to understand a relatively abstract or inherently unstructured subject matter in terms of a more concrete or at least more highly structured subject matter. Like the onomatopeics metaphors mappings of conceptions override the overt spoken and descriptive, and rely much more on mnemonics (something intended to assist the memory, as a verse or formula). Peculiar to the human, assistance comes from something much more primordial (constituting a beginning; giving origin to something derived or developed; original; elementary: primordial forms of life) to the person’s or societies experiences. Again, it is for such a risk that human management and monitoring may be required, an architectural design may warrant human invasiveness into the process. However, once completed these become the matrix (encyclopedic) of schemas (in argument; the warrants {where a warrant is a license to make an inference and as such must have reader's agreement} supporting the inferences (mappings) where in the metaphor becomes real). In this way the reader maps, learns and personalizes the strange into the realm of the familiar. The reader does so by the myriad of synaptic connections he is able to apply to that source. Hence humans translate their conceptions from philosophy, psychology, sociology, etc into two dimensional scaled drawings and then to real life full scale multi dimensions convention consisting of conventional materials, building elements the task of upload axioms to AI would take a lifetime of dedicated specialist [aa]. Well suited to AI as maps are the result of cartographers rendering existing into a graphics for reading so is mapping to the reading of metaphors where the reader renders understanding from one source to another. Doing so mentally and producing a rendition of understanding (as a pen and ink of a figure) not as a graphic but a conceptual understanding. The best risk management is when reader sees in a critical way the existing culling through and encyclopedia of referents to make the true relationship; the mapping which best renders the reality; the relationship which informs and clarifies as the map the location, configuration and characteristic of the reality. As the cartographer seeks lines, symbols and shadings to articulate the reality so the reader choices of heretofore unrelated and seemingly unrelated are found to have and essence common to both the reality and the rendition so that the metaphor can be repeated becoming the readers new vocabulary . In fact architects do the opposite as graphic renditions are made of synapses between amorphic and seemingly desperate information. This relationship between axiom and performance assure for program conformity and reliability. Yet the process of mapping is no less intense as architect review the matrix of conditions, operation , ideal and goals of the thesis to find similarities and differences , commonalities, and potential for one to resonate with another to make a “resolution” on the experience of a cognitive mapping which becomes the metaphor, parte and overwhelming new reality. The new reality is the target of the source and finally can be read. In the case of the birth of an infant metaphor readers may find a wide variety of source information which is germane to their own experience. Before the public ever sees the constructed metaphor Building Officials, manufactures, city planners, owners, estimators, general contactors, specialty contractors, environmentalist, neighbors and community organization first read the drawings and map their observations to their issues to form a slanted version of the reality. Human manager can easily monitor this variance and modify the performance. Their mappings are based on the warrants which are their licensed to perform. Each warrant will support a different mapping (inference) and result in its own metaphor. In effect each will see a kind of reality of the proposed in the perspective of their peculiar warrant, where license is permission from authority to do something. It is assumed if one gets permission it has met the conditions, operations, ideal and goals of the proposed metaphor. As risk is managed by other professions, operations and systems mapping is critical at this read to assure that the architect’s rendering of the program is faithful to the cognitive, lawful, physical and legal realities. It s like a map which gets tested by scientist, navigators , pilots and engineers before they build a craft to use the map, or set out on a journey using the map. Before the contracts start committing men and material the metaphor must map and be the metaphor meeting all expectations. As there is metaphor between natural (NI) and artificial intelligence (AI) in cognitive linguistics, conceptual metaphor, or cognitive metaphor, refers to the understanding of one idea, or conceptual domain, in terms of another, for example, understanding quantity in terms of directionality (e.g. "prices are rising"). A conceptual domain can be any coherent organization of human experience. The regularity with which different languages employ the same metaphors, which often appear to be perceptually based, has led to the hypothesis that the mapping between conceptual domains corresponds to neural mappings in the brain. Each mapping (where mapping is the systematic set of correspondences) that exist is between constituent elements of the source and the target domain. [I] Many elements of target concepts come from source domains and are not preexisting. To know a conceptual metaphor is to know the set of mappings that applies to a given source-target pairing. The same idea of mapping between source and target is used to describe analogical reasoning and inferences) is a fixed set of ontological (relating to essence or the nature of being) correspondences between entities in source domain and entities in target domain. There is a list of over 100 schemas in many categories about basic human behavior, reactions and actions. These schemas are the realms in which the mappings takes place much the same as the inferences in arguments have warrants and link evidence to claims so do these schemas, architects carry-over their experiences with materials, physics, art, culture, building codes, structures, plasticity, etc. to form metaphor. Identifying conditions, operations, ideals and goals are combined to form plans, sections and elevations which are then translated in to contract documents. Later the contractors map this metaphor based on their schemes of cost, schedule and quality control into schedules and control documents. Humans interact with their environments based on their physical dimensions, capabilities and limits. [F] The field of anthropometrics (human measurement) has unanswered questions, but it's still true that human physical characteristics are fairly predictable and objectively measurable. Buildings scaled to human physical capabilities have steps, doorways, railings, work surfaces, seating, shelves, fixtures, walking distances, and other features that fit well to the average person. [F] Humans also interact with their environments based on their sensory capabilities. The fields of human perception systems, like perceptual psychology and cognitive psychology, are not exact sciences, because human information processing is not a purely physical act, and because perception is affected by cultural factors, personal preferences, experiences, and expectations, so human scale in architecture can also describe buildings with sightlines, acoustic properties, task lighting, ambient lighting, and spatial grammar that fit well with human senses. However, one important caveat is that human perceptions are always going to be less predictable and less measurable than physical dimensions. For humans mappings are not arbitrary, but grounded in the body and in every day experience and knowledge. Mapping and making metaphors are synonymous. The person and not the work make the metaphor. Without the body and the experience of either the author or the reader nothing is being made. The thing does not have but the persons have the experiences. As language, craft, and skills are learned by exercise, repetition and every day application so are mappings. Mappings are not subject to individual judgment or preference: but as a result of making seeking and finding the commonality by practice. Humans learn to associate, create and produce by years of education and practice while users have a longer history approaching and mapping for use and recognition. Yet new metaphors are difficult to assimilate without daily use and familiarity. AI overcomes this and stores limited memory in RAM. A conceptual system contains thousands of conventional metaphorical mappings which form a highly structured subsystem of the conceptual system. Over the year’s society, cultures, families and individuals experience and store a plethora of mapping routines which are part of our mapping vocabulary. There are two types of mappings: conceptual mappings and image mappings; both obey the Invariance Principle. “A. Image metaphors are not exact “look-alikes” ;many sensory mechanisms are at work, which can be characterized by Langacker’s focal adjustment (selection, perspective, and abstraction); B. images and Image-schemas are continuous; an image can be abstracted/schematized to various degrees; and C. image metaphors and conceptual metaphors are continuous; conceptual metaphorical mapping preserves image-schematic structure (Lakoff 1990) and image metaphors often involve conceptual aspects of the source image. (“All metaphors are invariant with respect to their cognitive topology, that is, each metaphorical mapping preserves image-schema structure:” Likewise when we look at the geometrical formal parts of an architectural metaphor we note those common elements where fitting, coupling and joints occur), again this simultaneity of ideas and image operating in tandem where we see and know an idea simultaneously; where the convention of the architectural space and the metaphor of the conception converge. Such an axiom is the commonality between man and machine, AI and human architecture and AI mechanism and its manager. For both AI and humans the invariance principle offers the hypothesis that metaphor only maps components of meaning from the source language that remain coherent in the target context. The components of meaning that remain coherent in the target context retain their "basic structure" in some sense, so this is a form of invariance. For humans there will be all sorts of incongruities, similarities and differences. Both humans and AI can experience onomatopeics metaphors that are onomatopoeic (grouping of words that imitates the sound it is describing, suggesting its source object, such as "click", "bunk", "clang", "buzz", "bang", or animal noises such as "oink", "moo", or "meow") ? In this case an assemblage instead of a sound. As a non-linguistic it has impact beyond words and is still a metaphor. Then a metaphor is much more than the sum of its parts and is beyond any of its constituent constructions, parts and systems, its very existence a metaphor. The cost to convey inconsistencies, variables and nuances of human life can be formidable. Elegant architectural metaphors are those in which the big idea and the smallest of details echo and reinforce one another manifest in paraphrasing where “people ascertain the deep metaphor that underlies one or more surface metaphors by filling in terms of an implicitly analogy”. [11] It is the “filling in” wherein the [L] synapse (a region where nerve impulses are transmitted and received, encompassing the axon terminal of a neuron that releases neurotransmitters in response to an impulse) takes place. The difference between the indirect uses of metaphor verses the direct use of language to explain the world. . In some circles this is referred to tangential thinking, that approaching a subject from its edges without getting to the point. [12] Users can accept works which are vague, inane, and non-descript, evasive, and disorienting as between micro and macro metaphors and the way they can inform one another as the form of design may refer to its program, or a connector may reflect the concept of articulation as a design concept. Both machines and people have this capability, however the unpredictable human range is far more diverse and original. The macro metaphor drives the micro while they both inform one another. Metaphors work by “reference to analogies that are known to relate to the two domains”. In other words there is apriori knowledge of these before they are spoken and when heard they are immediately found. [13] Metaphors are formed in the human discovery of the obvious where one analogy begets another which may or may not be relevant but be interesting enough to explore and find a new referent. AI may receive, store and associate these to its existing but has only its artificial collective repertoire. Hover, as Microsoft spell-check it can learn, assimilate and recreate. A” problem of the metaphor concerns the relations between the word and sentence meaning, on the one hand, and speaker’s meaning or utterance meaning, on the other” [14] “Whenever we talk about the metaphorical meaning of a word, expression, or sentence, we are talking about what a speaker might utter it to mean, in a way it that departs from what the word, expression or sentence actually means”. Without apparent rhyme of reason metaphors of all arts have a way of recalling other metaphors of other times and places. ‘Human cognition is fundamentally shaped by various processes of figuration”. “The ease with which many figurative utterances are comprehended are has often been attributed to the constraining influence of the context” ………..Including [15] “the common ground of knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes recognized as being shared by speakers and listeners (architects and users(clients, public) As speakers architects, designers and makers “can’t help but employ tropes in every day conversation (design) because they conceptualize (design) much of their experience through the figurative schemes of metaphor (design). A metaphor involves a nonliteral use of language”. [16] A non-literal use of language means that what is said is for affect and not for specificity. Minimizing risk, metaphor is an abbreviated simile and to appreciate similarities and analogies which is called “appreciation”. [17] In psychology “appreciation” (Herbert (1898) was a general term for those mental process whereby an attached experience is brought into relation with an already acquired and familiar conceptual system (Encoding, mapping, categorizing, inference, assimilation and accommodation, attribution, etc). Metaphors build an image in the (AI system) mind, that is to say we (AI) “appreciate” what we already know. I have always contended that we do not learn anything we already do not know. We learn in terms of already established knowledge and concepts. We converse reiterating what we presume the other knows, otherwise the other party would not understand. The other party understands only because he already knows. In this way humans and machines are alike. Early stages of AI architectural application with architectural metaphoric axioms is best executed on commercial, industrial projects with little interior detail and which can be closely monitored. The risk of failure or mis-design my be simply mitigated after the completion but before submittal to building officials for code reviewed. The risks are fairly minimal since there are already phases in the design process which firewall the errors being transferred from one stage of development to the other. This in and of itself minimizes risk; Along with AI/BIM checking risk will be controlled. The architect who assembles thousands of bits of information , resifts and converts form words to graphics and specification documents communicates the new proposed (the strange new thing) in terms of the known and familiar. The first recipients are the owner, building officials; contractors must read seeking confirmations of known and confirm its adherence to expectations. After its construction the users read familiar signs, apparatus, spaces, volumes, shapes and forms. The bridge carries over from one to another what is already known .Even the strange that becomes familiar are both known but not in the current relationship. For example when we apply a technology used on ships to a building or a room which is commonly associated with tombs as a bank, etc. Both are generally known but not in that specific context. We could not appreciate it if it were not known .It is what Weiss calls commonalties and is the selection between commonalties and differences that makes a metaphor. About understanding and discerning between what is” true in fact” and “true in the model”. Since the gathering, assimilation and observation of human contributions is often exx43nstiol this is best done by humans to humans in teams known by some architects as “squatting”. [bb] Prototype theory is a mode of graded categorization in cognitive science, where some members of a category are more central than others. For example, when asked to give an example of the concept furniture, chair is more frequently cited than, say, stool.” [18] “Metaphors are generally used to describe something new by references to something familiar not just in conversation, but in such diverse areas as science and psychotherapy. For both men and machines metaphors are not just nice, they are necessary. They are necessary for casting abstract concepts in terms of the apprehendable, as we do, for example, when we metaphorically extend spatial concepts and spatial terms to the realms of temporal concepts and temporal terms. Metaphor is reasoning using abstract characters whereas reason by analogy is a straight forward extension of its use in commonplace reasoning. [19] All this to say and as if there was a choice that architects have a choice where to make a new building by analogy or by metaphor. Analogies may be the ticky-tacks, office building, church, school building, fire station analogies to a first model verses an abstraction of a program into a new prototype. Is the analogy any less a work of architecture? Or do we only mean that works of architecture are works of art when they make abstractions? Humans are able to design by metaphor whereas an artificial intelligence designs by analogy. [M] “In processing analogy, people implicitly focus on certain kinds of commonalities and ignore others”. Noting these things an industry was created called the “housing industry’ churning out analogies rather than individual metaphors, leaving the metaphor to the context or theme of the development. It is famous architects who are mostly famous because they made metaphors and from them analogies were drawn. The analogous phenomenon has resulted in the nineteenth century Sears offering pre-designed and package barns ready to ship form Wisconsin to any where by mail order. Pre-engineered metal being and manufactured homes are all part of the analogous scheme of reasoning the built environment. Users have access to either and are able to shift perceptions. In commonplace users wanting to be fed by metaphorical architecture go to Disney, European, or urban entertainment and recreation centers. Las Vegas thrives on what I call "metaphoric analogies” abstractions of analogous building types. It is that synapse which attracts and beguiles the visitor hungry for authenticity and reality. Living in analogous urban replicas city dweller migrated to the suburbs in search of the metaphor of “a man’s home is his castle”. Today this metaphor has become an analogy as the metaphor proliferates and analogies are transferred from one to another state and country. We may be told a “cell is like a factory” which gives us a framework for analogy and similarity. [19] An analogy is a kind of highly selective similarity where we focus on certain commonalities and ignore others. The commonality is no that they are both built out of bricks but that they both take in resources to operate and to generate their products. On the creative and architect’s side: “the central idea is that an analogy is a mapping of knowledge from one domain (the base) into another (the target) such that a system of relations that holds among the base objects also holds among the target objects”. On the user’s side in interpreting an analogy, people seek to put objects of the base in one-to-one correspondence with the objects of the targets as to obtain the maximum structural match”. Confronting a Bedouin village of tents a westerner faced with apparent differences looks for similarities. “The corresponding objects in the base and target need not resemble each other; rather object correspondences are determined by the like roles in the matching relational structures.” Cushions for seats, carpets for flooring, stretched fabric for walls, roof, and cable for beams and columns, etc. “Thus, an analogy is a way of aligning and focusing on rational commonalities independently of the objects in which those relationships are embedded.” However, there may be metaphors at work as well as the user reads the tent’s tension cable structure, banners and the entire assemblage in a “romantic” eclectic image of Arabness, metaphors beyond the imperial but of the realm of the abstract and inaccurate. Managing the process by quality checking the information from the fist domain minimizes risk assuring that analogy will be correct. “Central to the mapping process is the principle of “systematicity: people prefer to map systems of predicates favored by higher-order relations with inferential import (the Arab tent), rather that to map isolated predicates. The systematicity principle reflects a tacit preference for coherence and inferential power in interpreting analogy”. Metaphors work by applying to the principle (literal) subject of the metaphor a system of “associated implications” [20] characteristic of the metaphorical secondary subject. These implications are typically provided by the received “commonplaces” (ordinary; undistinguished or uninteresting; without individuality: a commonplace person.) About the secondary subject ‘The success of the metaphor rests on its success in conveying to the listener (Reader) some quieter defines respects of similarity or analogy between the principle and secondary subject, “human and AI design by translating concepts into two dimensional graphics that which ultimately imply a multidimensional future reality. “Dubbing” (invest with any name, character, dignity, or title; style; name; call) and “epistemic access” (relating to, or involving knowledge; cognitive.), “when dubbing is abandoned the link between language and the world disappears”. [21] Architectural metaphors are all about names, titles, and the access to that the work provides for the reader to learn and develop. At its best the vocabulary of the parts and whole of the work is an encyclopedia and cultural building block. The work incorporates the current state of man’s culture and society which is an open book for the reader. The freedom of both the creator and reader to dub and show is all part of the learning experience of the metaphor. As a good writer “shows” and not “tells” so a good designer manifests configurations without words. However objective, thorough and scientific; the designer, the design tools and the work gets dubbed with ideas (not techne) we may call style, personality, and identity above and beyond the program and its basic design (techne). It is additional controls, characterizations and guidelines engrafted into the form not necessarily overtly and expressly required. Dubbing may occur in the making of metaphors as a way in which the design itself is conceived and brought together. Dubbing may in fact be the process which created the work as an intuitive act. [22] Consider new concepts as being characterized in terms of old ones (plus logical conjunctives)” [E] As William J. Gordon points out we make the strange familiar by talking about one thing in terms of another. [22] “Knowledge” would not itself be conceptual or be expressed in the medium of thought, and therefore it would not be cognitively structured, integrated with other knowledge, or even comprehended. Hence, it would be intellectually inaccessible”. In other words we would not know that we know. Where knowing is the Greek for suffer, or experience. This was the Greek ideal proved in Oedipus; “through suffering man learns”; we know that we know. Therefore, when we observe that architecture makes metaphors we mean that we know that we know that works exists and we can read authors messages. We learn the work and improve the more artificial intelligence impacts the future of architecture. While architectural metaphoric axioms are proactive the context is benign and does not pose the catastrophic calamity doomsday- sayers prophesied. Still, it is good to know that Axioms provide the checks and balances to a successful and safe AI performance. Postscript: Aesthetics, human to machine admixture and AI as complex design tool Today it is possible for AI to design complex structures making possible the use of materials and structures heretofore uneconomical, too costly and time consuming to ever be considered, for example the steel light weight truss system [cc] of a conventional roof . Not withstanding the work of Afrred I Tauber’s Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science and considering the five senses of human experience defining aesthetics at best warrants a negotiated and interdependency between man and his AI system. What can be systemically or specifically programmed will never reconstruct the human that directly senses and then with a sixth sense makes some illogical but yet pleasing redirection to himself feel, experience and enjoy the environment. Aesthetics is a guiding principle in matters of artistic beauty and taste, metaphor is the warrant to taste and is used to form works of art and architecture. Aesthetics is also reasoning matters having to do with understanding perceptions. While AI tools may be designed to replicate man’s abilities to navigate, perceive, and judge the environment, AI cannot enjoy the experience as one man (or the collective of all men).Then the AI device still refers back to its creator to make sense of the events. It is to this extent that AI thinking can intelligently, without the normative sense feedback, be involved in aesthetic experience, judgment and consciousness. It is its limitation of total sovereignty, autonomy and independence of AI. It is likewise questionable, as a design device, to replace human designers as the affects the quality of the aesthetics of the design outcomes. But there is no doubt that the AI designer can change the paradigms of design outcomes where time, space and cost would otherwise be prohibited and therefore could potentially expand the, scope , breadth and depth of programs to fully design green buildings, solve environmental issues, optimize, use of space, materials and use materials in new ways. Multi-disciplinary access from arts, sciences, philosophies are economical and feasible with enough capacity and devises so that buildings and their systems can include the sculptors aesthetics for shapes and forms, the musicians ear for lyrical, harmony and the poets sense of rhyme, sense and inference, Not to mention behavior psychologist parameters of sequences and impacts of color, spaces, and distances, etc. AI design will also facilitate client, user and occupant participation in the design process. So while AI can perceive and act on signs of the senses the artificial is not natural and has no natural understanding of the senses. Aesthetically, as “beauty is in the eyes of the beholder” the AI does “be” but not “behold”. In fact, since the world in which man inhabits us actually design more and not les control of our habitations, that is while we wish our habitations to be designed more humanely than machine, meaning that ideally it would be designed by us. “Us” being natural man augmented by a device but not managed by that device. We do not desire the aesthetic of machines. As example we don’t want to live in a factory, industrial park or warehouse. Even living in a space capsule can only be for limited times as it is devoid of nature. It is nature and free will which artificial lacks. AI is not a sinister possibility but an opportunity to optimize the efficiency of nature in human terms. Human architects both compose the program and manage to reify its contents from words to diagrams and diagrams to two dimensional graphics and three dimensional models to reify and bring- out (educate) the user’s mind and fulfillment of unspoken and hidden needs. Needs which may or may not have been programmed and intended; the metaphor is the final resolution until it is built and used. Then it is subject to further tests of time, audience, trends, social politics, demographic shifts, economics, and cultural changes. The aesthetics of the process and the product are indigenous to natural man metaphor and a can be metaphorically assimilated by artificial intelligence architects. Conclusion: The risks which AI architectural axioms mitigate are benign, local and parochial to the profession and pose little danger to the general public. However, as a model and safe to develop it may be the proving ground and fist small step to bolster public confidence to consider applying AI to other applications which pose more of a risk public welfare. Citations listed alphabetically: Boyd, Richard; 1.14.0 Conrad, Ulrich; 1.3 Fraser, Bruce; 1.10.0 Gentner, Dedre; 1.13.0 Gibbs, Jr., Raymond W.; 1.9.0 Glucksberg, Sam; 1.12.0 Jeziorski, Michael; 1.13.0 Kuhn, Thomas S.; 1.15.0 Keysar, Boaz; 1.12.0 Lakoff, George; 1.4 Mayer, Richard E.; 1.17.0 Miller, George A.; 1.11.0 Nigro, Georgia; 1.5.0 Ortony, Andrew; 1.0 Oshlag, Rebecca S.; 1.18.0 Petrie, Hugh G; 1.18.0 Pylyshyn, Zeon W.; 1.16.0 Reddy, Michael J.; 1.2 Rumelhart, David E.; 1.7.0 Sadock, Jerrold M.; 1.6.0 Schon, Donald A.; 1.1 Searle, John R.; 1.8.0 Sternberg, Robert J.; 1.5.0 Thomas G. Sticht; 1.19.0 Tourangeau, Roger; 1.5.0 Weiss, Paul; 1.4.11 Footnotes: 1. From quote of New Visions of the Post-Industrial Society, Int. Conf. July 1994). 2. The Dartmouth proposal is based on the central idea of Pamela McCorduck's “Machines That Think”. She writes: "I like to think of artificial intelligence as the scientific apotheosis of a venerable cultural tradition." (McCorduck 2004, p. 34) "Artificial intelligence in one form or another is an idea that has pervaded Western intellectual history, a dream in urgent need of being realized. “(McCorduck 2004, p. xviii) "Our history is full of attempts—nutty, eerie, comical, earnest, legendary and real—to make artificial intelligences, to reproduce what is the essential us—bypassing the ordinary means. Back and forth between myth and reality, our imaginations supplying what our workshops couldn't, we have engaged for a long time in this odd form of self-reproduction." (McCorduck 2004, p. 3) She traces the desire back to its Hellenistic roots and calls it the urge to "forge the Gods." (McCorduck 2004, p. 340-400) and Main article: Philosophy of artificial intelligence Artificial intelligence, by claiming to be able to recreate the capabilities of the human mind, is both a challenge and an inspiration for philosophy. Are there limits to how intelligent machines can be? Is there an essential difference between human intelligence and artificial intelligence? Can a machine have a mind and consciousness? While anything known is programmable into an artificial man-made device it will only be as good as the AI team and limited by what their momentary mind and conscious dictated. As man’s mind and conscious is infinite, dynamic and subject to external (higher power) influences the AI device and system must constantly rely upon its creator team for updates and reconfigurations, reconfigurations on the basis of their new assessments and evaluations. 3. Mind, Machine, and Metaphor an Essay on Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning Alexander E. Silverman Westview Press 4. Artificial intelligence - metaphor or oxymoron? 4.1 Warren Blumenfeld, Pretty Ugly (New York New York, state, United States New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of: Perigee Books, 1989.) 4.2 Brad Darrach (1921-1997) was a journalist who wrote primarily for Time Inc. magazines including Time, Life, People and Sports Illustrated” and "Meet Shaky, The First Electronic Person." (Life, November 20, 1970, pp.58B-68.) 4.3 Hubert Lederer Dreyfus (born October 15, 1929) in Terre Haute, Indiana is a professor of philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, & Stuart Dreyfus, Mind Over Machine. (New York: Free Press, 1986.) 4.4 Marvin Minsky, "Artificial Intelligence." (Scientific American, September, 1966, pp.246-260.) 4.5 Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 4.6 Barbara Wallraff, "The Literate Computer." (Atlantic Monthly, January, 1988, pp. 64-71.) 4.7 West & L. Travis, "The Computational Metaphor and Artificial Intelligence." (AI Magazine, 12, (1), 1991, pp.64-79.) 4.8 Dr. Raymond Gozzi, Jr., is Associate Professor in the Television-Radio Department at Ithaca College 5. Metaphor and Artificial Intelligence: A Special Double Issue of metaphor and Symbol Edited by John A. Barnden, Mark G. Lee Published by: Psychology Press Publication Date: 1st March 2001 ISBN: 978-0-8058-9730-2 this special issue arose out of a symposium on metaphor and artificial intelligence in which the main orientation was computational models and psychological processing models of metaphorical understanding. The papers in this issue discuss: *implemented computational systems for handling different aspects of metaphor understanding; *how metaphor can be accommodated in accepted logical representational frameworks; *psychological processes involved in metaphor understanding; and *the cross-linguistic cognitive reality of conceptual metaphors. 6. Metaphor and Thought: Second Edition Edited by Andrew Ortony: School of Education and social Sciences and Institute for the learning Sciences: North Western University Published by Cambridge University Press First pub: 1979 Second pub: 1993 7. Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy: by Donald A. Schon 8. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language: by Michael J. Reddy. 9. Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture about Glasarchitektur Ulrich Conrad' 10. The contemporary theory of metaphor by George Lakoff 11. Metaphor, induction, and social policy: The convergence of macroscopic and microscopic views by Robert J. Sternberg, Roger Tourangeau, and Georgia Nigro 12. Figurative speech and linguistics by Jerrold M. Sadock 13. Some problems with the emotion of literal meanings by David E. Rumelhart 14 Metaphor by John R. Searle 15 Process and products in making sense of tropes by Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. 16. Interpretation of novel metaphors by Bruce Fraser 17. Images and models, similes and metaphors by George A. Miller 18. How metaphors work by Sam Glucksberg and Boaz Keysar 19. The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western science by Dedre Gentner and Michael Jeziorski 20 Metaphor and theory change: What is” metaphor” a metaphor for? By Richard Boyd 21. Metaphor in science by Thomas S. Kuhn 22. Metaphorical imprecision and the “top down” research strategy by Zeon W. Pylyshyn who is Board of Governors Professor of Cognitive Science at Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science. He is the author of Seeing and Visualizing: It's Not what You Think (2003) and Computation and Cognition: toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science (1984), both published by The MIT Press, as well as over a hundred scientific papers on perception, attention, and the computational theory of mind. Metaphor and Education is the final section: (Readers may wish to review my monograms on Schools and Metaphors (Main Currents in Modern Thought/Center for Integrative Education Sep.-Oct. 1971, Vol. 28 No.1, New Rochelle, New York and The Metametaphor of architectural education", (North Cypress, Turkish University. December, 1997) 23. The instructive metaphor: Metaphoric aids to students’ understanding of science by Richard E. Mayer 24. Metaphor and learning by Hugh G Petrie and Rebecca S. Oshlag 25. Educational uses of metaphor by Thomas G. Sticht References: A. Artificial intelligence (AI) is the intelligence of machines and the branch of computer science which aims to create it. Textbooks define the field as "the study and design of intelligent agents,"[1] where an intelligent agent is a system that perceives its environment and takes actions which maximize its chances of success. John McCarthy, who coined the term in 1956, defines it as "the science and engineering of making intelligent machines." B. Information technology (IT), as defined by the Information Technology Association of America (ITAA), is "the study, design, development, implementation, support or management of computer-based information systems, particularly software applications and computer hardware." IT deals with the use of electronic computers and computer software to convert, store, protect, process, transmit, and securely retrieve information. C. The first lectures "Architecture as the Making of Metaphors" were organized and conducted by Barie Fez-Barringten near the Art and Architecture building at the Museum of Fine Arts Yale University 11/02/67 until 12/04/67. The guest speakers were: Paul Weiss, William J. Gordon, Christopher Tunnard, Vincent Scully, Turan Onat, Kent Bloomer, Peter Millard, Robert Venturi, Charles Moore, Forrest Wilson, and John Cage. During a prior series of colloquia at Yale on art, Irving Kriesberg [C] [4] had spoken about the characteristics of painting as a metaphor. It seemed at once that this observation was applicable to architecture, to design of occupiable forms. An appeal to Paul Weiss drew from him the suggestion that we turn to English language and literature in order to develop a comprehensive, specific, and therefore usable definition of metaphor. But it soon became evident that the term was being defined through examples without explaining the phenomenon of the metaphor; for our purposes it would be essential to have evidence of the practical utility of the idea embodies in the metaphor as well as obvious physical examples. Out of this concern grew the proposal for a lecture series wherein professional and scholars would not only bring forward the uses of metaphor but would also produce arguments against its use. The beginning was steeped in deductive reasoning since there was no new information pertaining to metaphors. This included analyzing and explaining the syllogism: Art is the making of metaphors Architecture is an art Therefore architecture is the making of metaphors. Till now I did nothing to reason why art is the making of neither metaphors nor why architecture is an art. Since 1967 I proceeded to analyze the presumptions and find its many applications. This new information by Andrew Ortony first published in 1979, provides information to support inductive reasoning and to this end each axiom is its own warrant to the inferences of the above syllogism and the answer to question of why metaphor is the stasis to any of the syllogism’s claims and implications. As architecture is an art because, like all the arts, it too makes metaphors, it is the metaphor which likewise relates architecture, design and planning to artificial intelligence: they both are likewise both metaphors and metaphoric. Metaphor, in that “artificial” informs us about its intelligence (that it is neither human nor familiar) and intelligence in that it is made by man’s hand. It is a man made learning, reasoning, understanding processor which makes the strange familiar and reasons one thing in terms of another. It is not a referent for a person, or a life-form but something inhuman and mechanical. Without a name, application and by itself as a metaphor it is strange and yearns to be made familiar. D. The Computational Metaphor and Artificial Intelligence: A Reflective Examination of a Theoretical False work by David M. West, Larry E. Travis Considers questions of metaphor in science and the computational metaphor in AI. Specifically, three issues: the role of metaphor in science and AI, an examination of the computational metaphor, and an introduction to the possibility and potential value of using alternative metaphors as a foundation for AI theory. E. Metaphorical way of knowing by William J.J Gordon: Gordon began formulating the Synectics method in 1944 with a series ... (Cambridge), ... Gordon in his book The Metaphorical Way of Learning and Knowing, Synectics asks participants to solve problems by thinking in analogies--to identify ways in which one pattern or situation is like or similar to another totally unrelated pattern or situation. Synectics uses comparisons such as analogies and metaphors to stimulate associations. Developed by George M. Prince. Gordon was one of the original speakers at the Yale lecture series. F. Paul Weiss: Born in 1901, Paul Weiss has made major contributions to several branches of philosophy, as well as to teaching and scholarly publishing. Alfred North Whitehead remarked: "The danger of philosophical teaching is that it may become dead-alive, but in Paul Weiss's presence that is impossible". Weiss is widely believed to be America's greatest living speculative metaphysician, but he has also made notable philosophical contributions to the discussion of sports, the arts, religion, logic, and politics. Professor Weiss has been highly productive: his Being and Other Realities (1995) was hailed as one of his most exciting books, and as this volume goes to press he is hard at work on yet another major treatise. The distinguished Library of Living Philosophers, founded in 1938, is devoted to critical analysis and discussion of some of the world's greatest living philosophers. Weiss (b.1901) is arguably America's greatest living speculative metaphysician, as well as a noteworthy philosophical contributor to the discussion of sport, the arts, architecture, religion, logic, and politics. He was my mentor when I began this research. Before his death at 101 years of age completed a book called "Emphatics," about the use of language. Dr. Weiss worked in the branch of philosophy known as metaphysics, which addresses questions about the ultimate composition of reality, including the relationship between the mind and matter. He was particularly interested in the way people related to each other through symbols, language, intonation, art and music. Emphatics, (2000), which considers how ordinary experience stands in some dynamic relationship with a second dimension, which provides focus, interruption, significance or grounds. " G. Surrogates," published by Indiana University Press. Weiss says that: “A surrogate is "a replacement that is used as a means for transmitting benefits from a context in which its’ user may not be a part”. Architecture’s metaphors bridge from the program, designs and contactors a shelter and trusted habitat. The user enters and occupies the habitat with him having formulated but not articulated any its characteristics. Yet it works. “It makes sense, therefore, to speak of two sides to a surrogate, the user side and the context side (from which the user is absent or unable to function). “ Each of us uses others to achieve a benefit for ourselves. “We have that ability”. “None of us is just a person, a lived body, or just an organism. We are all three and more. We are singulars who own and express ourselves in and through them. In my early twenties I diagramed a being as “”appetite”, “desire” and “mind”. I defined each and described there interrelationships and support of one another. Metaphor is one and all of these and our first experiences of sharing life with in to what are outside of us. Likewise we can speak of the way architects use AI to augment their capability and capacity to innovate and complete projects. Metaphors are accepted at face value and architecture is accepted at face value. Weiss:” It is surely desirable to make a good use of linguistic surrogates” “ A common language contains many usable surrogates with different ranges, all kept within the limited confines that an established convention prescribes” It is amazing how that different people can understand one another and how we can read meaning and conduct transaction with non-human extents, hence architecture. As AI, architecture is such a “third party” to our experience yet understandable and in any context. In his search for what is real Weiss says he has explored the large and the small and the relationships that realities have to one another. Accustomed to surrogates architecture is made by assuming these connections are real and have benefit. Until they are built and used we trust that they will benefit the end user. H. Metaphor and AI: Statistic Relevance and Cognitive Role. A Study on the Verb "guidare" (to drive) by Simona Musco, Università degli Studi della Calabria, 2005-06. What is the way man understands metaphor? The principal question is about the possibility of the existence of physical systems different from man that is able to reproduce the same phases that take to the comprehension of a metaphor. The tentative is that to prove the thesis of an “embodied” language, in which metaphors take an important place. For long time, in fact, there has been a wrong theory about metaphor, considered only for its aesthetic value in the language, not important for the acquisition of new knowledge. “Then I’ve tried to demonstrate that there are artificial systems that can acquire knowledge by themselves, without the implementation of specific programs. Before this, I’ve analyzed some earlier tentative of naturalization of mind, with some examples of systems created for the analysis of natural language. Their lack was to be either symbolic or able to learn, while the right way is to analyze an artificial system that is both symbolic and able to learn. I’ve done this on the basis of the studies that Elisabetta Gola has done on the verb "vedere" (to see), but doing on my own an analysis of another verb, "guidare" (to drive). During the experiment I’ve given to the system some data to learn, on the basis of which it has to find regularities that are so not taught but literally learnt. It’s the same system that creates its own rules, by casting how it has learnt on what it doesn’t know yet, trying to disambiguate it. Thanks to this it has been denied another false believing about language: there are not simply some rules we have to follow and on the basis of which to create texts, these rules have always to face with the new linguistic situations to which man has to adapt himself. So, the artificial systems and the biological ones are similar for their dynamicity, because they cope with the new situations in a way that is controlled and creative at the same time. I. This idea, and a detailed examination of the underlying processes, was first extensively explored by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in their work 1.4.9 Metaphors We Live By. Other cognitive scientists study subjects similar to conceptual metaphor under the labels "analogy" and "conceptual blending." J. Artificial brain: Moravec 1988; Kurzweil 2005, p. 262; Russell Norvig, p. 957; and Crevier 1993, pp. 271 and 279 The most extreme form of this argument (the brain replacement scenario) was put forward by Clark Glymour in the mid-70s and was touched on by Zenon Pylyshyn and John Searle in 1980. Daniel Dennett sees human consciousness as multiple functional thought patterns; see "Consciousness Explained". K. This version is from Searle (1999), and is also quoted in Dennett 1991, p. 435. Searle's original formulation was "The appropriately programmed computer really is a mind, in the sense that computers given the right programs can be literally said to understand and have other cognitive states." (Searle 1980, p. 1). Strong AI is defined similarly by Russell & Norvig (2003, p. 947): "The assertion that machines could possibly act intelligently (or, perhaps better, act as if they were intelligent) is called the 'weak AI' hypothesis by philosophers, and the assertion that machines that do so are actually thinking (as opposed to simulating thinking) is called the 'strong AI' hypothesis “ from Searle's Chinese Room argument: Searle 1980, Searle 1991; Russell & Norvig 2003, pp. 958-960; McCorduck 2004, pp. 443-445 and Crevier 1993, pp. 269-271. L. Synapse is metaphor where two are joined together as the side-by-side association of homologous paternal and maternal chromosomes during the first prophase of meiosis. How this happens is as biblical as: “faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen” where our mental associations are themselves the metaphor, the evidence of the works we do not actually see. We see the metaphor, we read its extent, we synapse, analogies and metaphorize absorbing its information, contextualizing and as much as possible and resurrecting its reasons for creation. The architectural metaphor only speaks through its apparent shape, form, volume, space, material, etc that the concepts which underlie each are known to the user as they would to a painting, poem, or concerto. M. NASA; Goddard Space Flight Center; Official: Steven Curtis; Website Curator: James Daniel; Last Updated: April 2008. The President's Vision for Space Exploration initiated the transformation of NASA's extraordinary capabilities. The goals of the new vision include advancement of U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests through a robust space exploration program which includes the goal of human exploration of planetary surfaces. The Vision requires innovative multi-function structures, minimal resource use, and development of stand-alone and human-interfaced robotic capabilities. Our team has responded by developing ART (Addressable Reconfigurable Technology), as near-term Tetrahedral Walkers and Manipulators for lunar reconnaissance (ALMA/ALI) and as a more advanced mobile infrastructure for lunar exploration and exploitation (LARA) with applicability wherever extreme mobility is required on Earth. Future ART structures will be capable of true autonomy using bi-level intelligence combining autonomic and heuristic aspects, acting as part of an Autonomous Nanotechnology Swarm (ANTS). The Autonomous Nanotechnology Swarm (ANTS) Architecture is well suited to remote space or ground operations. It is being implemented on a near term basis, using Addressable Reconfigurable Technology (ART). In the future, Super Miniaturized ART (SMART) will form highly reconfigurable networks of struts, acting as 3D mesh or 2D fabric to perform a range of functions on demand. The ANTS approach harnesses the effective skeletal/ muscular system of the frame itself to enable amoeboid movement, effectively ‘flowing’ between morphological forms”. ANTS’ structures would thus be capable of forming an en tire mobile modular infrastructure adapted to its environment. The ANTS architecture is metaphorically inspired by the success of social insect colonies, a success based on the {axiom} division of labor within the colony in two key ways: [principle of axiom [T]} First, within their specialties, individual specialists generally outperform generalists. [Principle of axiom [T]} Second, with sufficiently efficient social interaction and coordination, the group of specialists generally outperforms the group of generalists. Thus systems designed as ANTS are built from potentially very large numbers of highly autonomous, yet socially interactive elements. The architecture is self-similar in those elements and sub-elements of the system may also be recursively structured as ANTS on scales ranging from microscopic to interplanetary distances” These are both metaphoric and multidisciplinary applications of axioms and AI methodology. AI Architecture is not the making of metaphors but self translating the design into a finally built product. N. Architecture: Biological Form and Artificial Intelligence.; Nikos A. Salingaros (*) and Kenneth G. Masden II (**) ; University of Texas at San Antonio; (*) Department of Mathematics ; (**) College of Architecture; A revised version of this paper, with illustrations, is published in The Structurist, No. 45/46 (2006), pages 54-61. An organism that exists in a symbolic abstracted domain is not totally alive, since there is nothing to ground it to the real world. It is more like a computer, executing an algorithm but not participating in the external world. This entity resides partially or entirely within its own model of an artificial world. One may go further and suggest that such an organism is not intelligent. As stated by Brooks: "It is hard to draw the line at what is intelligence, [O] and what is environmental interaction. In a sense it does not really matter which is which, as all intelligent systems must be situated in some world or other if they are to be useful entities. The key idea from intelligence is: 'Intelligence is determined by the dynamics of interaction with the world'. [P] [O] Intelligence, according to is the capacity for learning, reasoning, understanding, and similar forms of mental activity; aptitude in grasping truths, relationships, facts, meanings, etc. Since metaphor in intrinsic to this definition the field of artificial intelligence is inherently metaphoric. And, since anything artificial is man-made by some techne it too, as any art, is metaphoric formalizing something by a skill. P. Rodney A. Brooks, Cambrian Intelligence (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1999). Q. Applications of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Component-Based Modular Building Design” by C. Bridgewater, (Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Imperial Coll. of Sci. Technol. and Medicine, South Kensington, London, SW7 2BU, England.) and B. L. Atkin, (Prof., Dept. of Constr. Mgmt. & Engrg., Univ. of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AZ, England.) Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 4, October 1994, pp. 469-488, (doi 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1994)8:4(469)) R. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Building, Construction and Engineering, PO Box 56, Highett, Victoria, 3190, Australia. [R] “The development of standardized product and process models for the building and construction industry has now reached a stage where collaborative design is feasible. The challenge comes from the appropriate adoption of emerging technologies to support advanced data interoperability at different levels of granularity. Interoperability is the enabling mechanism that allows information to be exchanged between collaborative systems. The process covers the information flow from a CAD system to the code checking system. It contains the events and activities taking place within each separate CAD and compliance checking system and through the communication channels between the two systems”. S. Algorithmic Architecture Institute of Artificial Art Amsterdam: Parklaan 55 3722 BD Bilthoven The Netherlands a. Eric Vreedenburgh and Remko Scha: "The Artificial City." In: Flip ten Cate (ed.): De Vrije Ruimte. Nieuwe Strategieën voor de Ruimtelijke Ordening. Amsterdam: Stichting Ontwerpen voor Nederland, 1998, pp. 154-155. [In Dutch.] b. Remko Scha: "Towards Architecture of Chance." In: Hans Konstapel, Gerard Rijntjes and Eric Vreedenburgh (eds.): De Onvermijdelijke Culturele Revolutie. (Den Haag: Stichting Maatschappij en Onderneming, 1998), pp. 105-114. [In Dutch.] c. Jos de Bruin and Remko Scha: "Algoritmische architectuur is toegepaste toevalskunst." Automatisering Gids, April 25, 2003, p. 17. T. Other monographs by Barie fez-Barringten 1. Deriving the Multidiscipline axioms from Metaphor and Thought [1] 2. Metaphor and Cognition 3. The science supporting the stasis to architecture being an art [I]: 4. Language of metaphors applied to multidiscipline architecture 5. “Metaphor’s interdisciplinary Axioms 6. Metaphoric Axioms for Micro disciplinary Architecture 7. Complex Structure: art and architecture stasis 8. Metaphor axioms of art, architecture and aesthetics 9. Aesthetic principles of metaphor, art and architecture 10. The Six Principles of Art’s & Architecture’s Technical and Conceptual Metaphors 11. Framing the art [A] vs. architecture argument 12. Metaphoric Evidence U. VBE global network: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland: Copyright © VTT 2006 Virtual Building Environments (VBE) II project is a pivotal opportunity for Finnish Real Estate and Construction Cluster (RECC) to establish an international competitive advantage in the design, construction and operation of buildings. Virtual Buildings are digital representations of buildings that can be used for visualizing, analyzing and managing various aspects of buildings throughout their lifecycle; starting from the early design and ending to the demolition of the buildings. The use of Virtual Buildings is already providing competitive advantages to some RECC organizations. VBE is referring to a group of software applications that, as a group, define a building, its parts, its behavior and its performance. It facilitates the manipulation and storage of data that are used in the planning, design, construction and operation of a building. It makes it possible to conduct experiments on the building or with its parts, without first erecting the building or its parts. The VBE is being used as a general title in this project reflecting the situation where ICT modeling is exhaustively used for the building process throughout their lifecycle. The main goal of the project initiative is the use of VBE technologies in RECC. Consequently, the initiative has several additional goals that will affect how the industry is likely to operate in the future. These range from effects on industry processes to enabling industry software interoperability, and from educating professionals to providing help on real life industry projects. V. Distributed routine design over the internet with cooperating mdm agents Pages: 209 by Mustafa Taner Eskil Michigan State University as advised by: Jon Sticklen Michigan State University: Published in 2004 by: Michigan State University East Lansing, MI, USA Year of Publication: 2004 ISBN:0-496-91545-2, Order Number:AAI3158940 W. One theory claims that Professor Charles M. Eastman at Georgia Institute of Technology coined the term. This theory is based on a view that the term Building Information Model is basically the same as Building Product Model, which Professor Eastman has used extensively in his book and papers since the late 1970s. ('Product model' means 'data model' or 'information model' in engineering.) Nevertheless, it is agreed upon that the term was popularized by Jerry Laiserin as a common name for a digital representation of the building process to facilitate exchange and interoperability of information in digital format. According to him and others the first implementation of BIM was under the Virtual Building concept by Graphisoft's ArchiCAD, in its debut in 1987. Typically BIM uses three-dimensional, real-time, dynamic building modeling software to increase productivity in building design and construction. The process produces the Building Information Model (also abbreviated BIM), which encompasses building geometry, spatial relationships, geographic information, and quantities and properties of building components. X. AI & Society; Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication ISSN: 0951-5666 (print version) ISSN: 1435-5655 (electronic version) Journal no. 146 Springer London Y. HTTP://WWW.COMPUTERHOPE.COM IS COPYRIGHTED 1998-2009. . the first electrical binary programmable computer analogy was to the adding machine called the Z1 originally created by Germany's Konrad Zuse in his parent’s living room between 1936 and 1938 Z. (Ray Kurzweil "The Age of Spiritual Machines" and Hans Moravec's "Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind”.” The Singularity" is a phrase borrowed from the astrophysics of black holes. The phrase has varied meanings; as used by Vernor Vinge and Raymond Kurzweil, it refers to the idea that accelerating technology will lead to superhuman machine intelligence that will soon exceed human intelligence, probably by the year 2030. The results on the other side of the "event horizon," they say, are unpredictable. We'll try anyway. aa. Axiom’s contextual forms Three levels of axioms matching three levels of AI disciplines which influence AI architectures. Multidiscipline: Macro most general where the metaphors and axioms and metaphors used by the widest and diverse AI disciplines, users and societies. All of society, crossing culture, disciplines, professions, industrialist arts and fields as mathematics and interdisciplinary vocabulary. Interdisciplinary axioms are between AI fields of art [I] whereas metaphors in general inhabit all these axioms drive a wide variety and aid in associations, interdisciplinary contributions and conversations about broad fields not necessary involved with a particular project but if about a project about all context including city plan, land use, institutions, culture and site selection, site planning and potent ional neighborhood and institutional involvement. Micro Discipline: Between AI architects all involved in making the built environment particularly on single projects involving relevant arts[I], crafts, manufactures, engineers, sub-con tractors and contactors. As well as owners, users, neighbors, governments agencies, planning boards and town councils. bb. The Charrette Handbook, Bill Caudill interviewed by Larry Meyer for an Oral Business History Project, University of Texas, 1971; sponsored by The Moody Foundation. Source: CRS Archives, CRS Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. A Piece of Charrette History: The CRS “Squatters” April 3rd, 2006 by Bill Lennertz “The evolution of the collaborative, multiple-day, inclusive, on-site Charrette is not a linear one but its roots can be found in a variety of projects and processes, some of which were related to land use and some of which were not. It is hard to pinpoint just when design firms first began to involve stakeholders in the design process. One of the most sited processes is the CRS “squatters.” In 1948, CRS held the first “squatters” in Blackwell, Oklahoma on an elementary school project. The Austin, Texas firm had a long commute to the project site that they found wasted a lot of time, money, energy and creative ideas. The partners set up a temporary office and “squatted” at the school site until all of the design issues with the school board were resolved”.. CC. TrusSteel is the product of over fifty-four years of combined experience in the truss and CFS building products industry. Built upon the extensive truss engineering and software knowledge of Alpine, an experienced staff of CFS design engineers and many years of designing and building efficient trusses, it is no surprise that more TrusSteel trusses are installed on commercial projects each year than any other proprietary CFS truss system. With computerized design what would take hours for each member, now is done in minutes and multiplied time the hundreds in each system the material is now economically available. dd. between Narrative and Number: The Case of ARUP's 3D Digital City Model Harvey Cultural Sociology.2009; 3: 257-276 ee. Emergence: Morphogenetic Design Strategies by Michael Hensel, Michael Weinstock Hensel, M., Menges, A., Weinstock, M. (eds.): 2004, Emergence: Morphogenetic Design Strategies, Architectural Design, Vol. 74 No. 3, Wiley Academy, London. (ISBN: 0-470-86688-8) ff. “Risk management is the identification, assessment, and prioritization of risks followed by coordinated and economical application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability and/or impact of unfortunate events. Risk management should create value; be an integral part of organizational processes; be part of decision making; explicitly address uncertainty; be systematic and structured; be based on the best available information; should be tailored; take into account human factors; be transparent and inclusive; be dynamic, iterative and responsive to change and should be capable of continual improvement and enhancement. Once an AI risks has been identified, it must then be assessed as to its potential severity of loss and to the probability of occurrence. These quantities can be either simple to measure, in the case of the value of a lost building, or impossible to know for sure in the case of the probability of an unlikely event occurring. Therefore, in the assessment process it is critical to make the best educated guesses possible in order to properly prioritize the implementation of the risk management plan. The fundamental difficulty in risk assessment is determining the rate of occurrence since statistical information is not available on all kinds of past incidents. Furthermore, evaluating the severity of the consequences (impact) is often quite difficult for immaterial assets” In architectural design AI risks extend to return on investment analysis and cost to benefit in including the cost of the AI system and the manpower needed to manage and monitor the works. Only such projects as has recently been budgeted for Shanghai, Hong Kong, Dubai, and Doha could afford deploying this initiative. “Risk management also faces difficulties allocating resources to minimize spending while maximizing the reduction of the negative effects of risks. Assessment of an AI initiative includes identifying, characterizing, and assessing threats; assess the vulnerability of critical assets to specific threats; determine the risk (i.e. the expected consequences of specific types of attacks on specific assets); identify ways to reduce those risks and prioritize risk reduction measures based on a strategy”. [ff] Disaster Recovery Journal "Committee Draft of ISO 31000 Risk management" (PDF). International Organization for Standardization. gg. Researched Publications: Refereed and Peer-reviewed Journals: 1. "Architecture the making of metaphors” Main Currents in Modern Thought/Center for Integrative Education; Sep.-Oct. 1971, Vol. 28 No.1, New Rochelle, New York. 2."Schools and metaphors” Main Currents in Modern Thought/Center for Integrative Education Sep.-Oct. 1971, Vol. 28 No.1, New Rochelle, New York. 3."User's metametaphoric phenomena of architecture and Music": “METU” (Middle East Technical University: Ankara, Turkey): May 1995" Journal of the Faculty of Architecture 4."Metametaphors and Mondrian: Neo-plasticism and its' influences in architecture", 1993 5. "The Metametaphor of architectural education", North Cypress, Turkish University. December, 1997 6."Mosques and metaphors” Unpublished, 1993 7."The basis of the metaphor of Arabia" Unpublished, 1993 8."The conditions of Arabia in metaphor" Unpublished, 1993 9. "The metametaphor theorem" Architectural Scientific Journal, Vol. No. 8; 1994 Beirut Arab University. 10. "Arabia’s metaphoric images" Unpublished, 1993 11."The context of Arabia in metaphor" Unpublished, 1993 12. "A partial metaphoric vocabulary of Arabia" “Architecture: University of Technology in Datutop; February 1995 Finland 13."The Aesthetics of the Arab architectural metaphor" “International Journal for Housing Science and its applications” Coral Gables, Florida.1993 14."Multi-dimensional metaphoric thinking" Open House, September 1997: Vol. 22; No. 3, United Kingdom: Newcastle uponTyne 15."Teaching the techniques of making architectural metaphors in the twenty-first century." Journal of King Abdul Aziz University Egg...Sciences; Jeddah: Code: BAR/223/0615:OCT.2.1421 H. 12TH EDITION; VOL.I 16. Word Gram #9 Permafrost: Vol.31 Summer 2009 University of Alaska Fairbanks; ISSN: 0740-7890; page 197 17. "Metaphors and Architecture." October, 2009.MIT press hh. The technical is that all art [I], including AI expresses one thing in terms of another by its inherent and distinct craft. On the one hand there is the architect who acts as the master builder (head carpenter); and on the other the fountain of conceptual metaphors which expresses ideas as built conceptual metaphors other wise known as works of architecture. Techne is actually a system of practical knowledge as a craft or art informed by knowledge of forms, cybernetics and computational neuroscience computer scientists, programmers, are just some of the disciplines researching this craft.

Web Site: Artificial Intelligence Design Metaphor

Want to review or comment on this article?
Click here to login!

Need a FREE Reader Membership?
Click here for your Membership!

Popular Internet Articles
  1. Go Viral, But for a Purpose
  2. AuthorsDen on Facebook
  3. Why are our children and teenagers not pro
  4. Is The Internet Good or Bad
  5. Get 200k right now! If you find a better d
  6. Harpies and Magpies on the Internet
  7. Star Controllers
  8. Something is 'not quite right'

Embers under my skin by Albert Russo

Albert Russo's new poetry book..  
BookAds by Silver, Gold and Platinum Members

THE GATE - Things my Mother told me. by Stan Law (aka Stanislaw Kapuscinski)

For anyone with interest in Alzheimer's and/or dementia, this book is a must read. This Fictional Biography is now available on the, most other online distributors, or t..  
BookAds by Silver, Gold and Platinum Members

Authors alphabetically: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Featured Authors | New to AuthorsDen? | Add AuthorsDen to your Site
Share AD with your friends | Need Help? | About us

Problem with this page?   Report it to AuthorsDen
© AuthorsDen, Inc. All rights reserved.