AuthorsDen.com   Join Free! | Login  

     Popular! Books, Stories, Articles, Poetry
Where Authors and Readers come together!

SIGNED BOOKS    AUTHORS    eBOOKS new!     BOOKS    STORIES    ARTICLES    POETRY    BLOGS    NEWS    EVENTS    VIDEOS    GOLD    SUCCESS    TESTIMONIALS

Featured Authors:  M. R. Mathias, iRussell Williams, iVaughn Aiken, iPeter Oszmann, iPaul Ulasien, iPatricia Garber, iLori Maynard, i

  Home > Sept 11, 2001 > Articles Popular: Books, Stories, Articles, Poetry     

Stan Carter

· Become a Fan
· Contact me
· Books
· Articles
· News
· 5 Titles
· 1 Reviews
· Save to My Library
· Share with Friends!
·
Member Since: Apr, 2006

Stan Carter, click here to update your pages on AuthorsDen.




   Recent articles by
Stan Carter

Willful Denial
PNAC and WWIII
           >> View all

911 Demolition Conclusive
by Stan Carter   
Not "rated" by the Author.
Last edited: Tuesday, July 25, 2006
Posted: Tuesday, July 25, 2006

Share    Print   Save    Become a Fan


Imperical evidence that the WTC's Towers 1 & 2 and FBI, CIA, WTC building #7 all came down in textbook demolitions. I repeat IMPERICAL EVIDENCE.

911 Demolition Conclusive


By
Estanislao Carter


With a growing base of evidence, it finally seems we can officially
make a case for a controlled demolition of the World Trade Centers,
buildings #1, #2, and #7. So much happened, and didn't happen on that
day that it is to easy to get lost in the woods. To not see the proverbial
tree right in front of us.


Does proving a demolition cover the Pentagon, Al Quada or the War with
Iraq, no it does not. But it is the very first domino we must fall.
If we can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that America's icons came
down via controlled demolition instead of the official story it is the
spring board, it is the gateway to all the other anomalies that happened
that day.


As a result one would have to ask, "if demolitions take weeks to set
up, how did they do it and on who's watch?" I'm sure you can see how
this could quickly become a major ordeal.


Let me begin by saying, what I offer is expert testimony backed by
eyewitness accounts. I am not addressing motive, I am simple proving
that the 3 buildings came down via controlled demolition, nothing more.


The official line is that the plane impacts plus fire caused the collapse
of two sky-scrappers in less than a hour.





























































































Problems with the Offical Explaination:



Our Solution to the Problems:



1. Architects designed the building to take multiple impacts.
The endo / exo-skeleton structure would not be compromised by
even 2 airplane strikes and the floors were designed to take 10x
the maximum load.



1. The endo / exo-skeleton structure would not be compromised
by even 2 airplane strikes per tower. The Empire State Building
was hit by a bomber without causing any major structural damage.
Historically, no high-rise has been significantly damaged by an
airplane strike. The WTC was designed specifically with this in
mind and was over engineered for extreme situations.



Their Position: alter the
WTC center model without the 47 interior pillars.



Our Position: The airplanes
nor the fires were the cause of the collapse.


2. engineers attest that jet fuel cannot
nearly create enough heat to even compromise the steel.
2. Steel is a conductor of heat and any
local heat disapates throughout the entire structure, failure by
jet fuel fire is improbable. Also, they had recently upgraded the
water sprinkling system.
Their
Position:
disregard engineering standards
Our Proof:
Industry standards of melting points proves the fires were not hot
enough to even compromise the steel. Eyewitnesses say there were
only two pockets of mild fires.
3. other buildings hit by planes
and burning for days never collapsed.
3. Steel high-rises
or sky-scrappers do not succumb to fire.
Their
Position:
bigger planes, bigger buildings
Our Proof:
The WTC tower had caught on fire before and had burned for a day
without any structural damage what-so-ever. No structural steel
high-rise has even collapsed due to fire or air-plane strike.
4. fire-fighters report only small pockets
of fires that could be easily put out.
4. Only small pockets of fires were a
result.
Their
Position:
disregard eyewitness testimony
Our Position:
The fires were not the cause of the collapse of both towers in less
than an hour.
5. survivors are seen in the impact
hole unaffected by the alleged white hot raging fires.
5. The fires were only
mild as reported.
Their
Position:
disregard
Our Position:
The fires were not the cause of the collapse of both towers in less
than an hour.
6. molten "iron" pours
like lava from the damaged corner
6. This is the result of demolition
thermite molten iron.
Their
Position:
That was the melted airplane
Our Proof:
melted airplane aluminum is silver grey like Mercury. Thermite produces
red/orange molten metal and white ash smoke.
7. Jet
fuel burns at 1800 degress F. Yet pools of molten steel 2800 degrees
F are found in WTC 1, 2 and 7 for weeks after.
7.The entire center
columns of both WTC's and building #7 would need to be sliced into
30' pieces. With 47 interior columns that's approximately 188 cuts
with thermate producing large amounts of molten iron and steel at
extremely high temperatures.

Their Position: That was
the melted airplane and steel.


Disregard building #7


Our
Proof:
Thermite and sulfur together make a much hotter
Thermate - this was found on WTC metal.
8. concrete is pulverized into fine dust. 8. Only explosives and Superthermite is powerful enough
to vaporize concrete into fine dust.
Their
Position:
disregard

Our Position: Only volcanic
flows and demolition produce pyroclastic flows like the ones seen
during 911.


Our Proof: Physics also agrees
that a structure can collapse from gravity or it can explode,
there is not enough laten energy to do both. The WTC collapses
do not conform to Natural Law. Eyewittnesses say only a CD sized
piece of a telephone remained. Everything else was pulverized.


9. WTC
1, 2, and 7 all fall at near free fall speed voilating the laws
of physics.
9. The
WTC collapses did not violate physics or the Laws of Nature. A controlled
demolition crippling each floor just before a pancaking impact,
is the only way for a building to meet absolutely no resistance.
Their
Position:
It was a pancaking. Disregard physics. Building
#7 was an unknown anomaly.
Our Proof:
An object cannot fall through 47 concrete reinforced steel columns
as easily as it falls through thin air. Projections indicate that
a natural collapse, albeit unheard of, would take at least 100 seconds
and not the 9.6 seconds seen on 911.

10. Chemical analysis of WTC steel shows sulfur enriched thermite
or thermate and melted iron.



10. A combination of Thermite, Thermate
and Superthermite were used to bring the WTC towers and building
#7 down in their own footprints. Setting up the controlled demoltions
would be unique and time consuming. Total access would need to be
given for weeks. Bomb sniffing dogs could not be allowed access.
The main foundational columns would need to be compromised and then
the floors taken down in succession. The metal would then need to
be removed and recycled without a criminal investigation.
Their
Position:
N/A
Our Proof:
Weeks prior to 911, major work crews had unlimited access. One week
prior, bomb sniffing dogs, a standard safety precaution, stopped
their routine. • The WTC buildings came down by what can only
be, by the laws of nature, a controlled implosion or a controlled
demolition. • The metal was illegally removed and specifically
blocked from investigation. Thermate and molten iron was found on
steel beams taken from the WTC.

"The individual is handicapped
by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous -


he simply cannot believe it exists"


- J. Edgar Hoover



We have photos of sliced and melted center columns (above). We have
volumes of eye witness accounts
describing secondary explosives, large basement explosions, multiple
successive explosions and multiple flashes of light all common in controlled
demolitions. We have Mr.
Silverstein
owner of the WTC announcing on network TV that they
"pulled" building #7. Again slang that is common in controlled
demoltions. We have video of the collapses themselves - Building #7
representing a textbook demolition, and the WTC towers emulating controlled
demoltions. We have absolutely debunked the official story with its
circumstances voilating imperical natural laws and the laws of physics.
And now with the work of Dr. Steven E. Jones we now have imperical conclusive
proof of the use of Thermate, used only in controlled demoltions and
specifically used for this high strength steel.




We are no longer "conspiracy nuts", we are the patriots we
knew we were all along. And if it comes to name calling then the label
of bubble baby, ostrich or sheep may be in order. The days of insults
and trecherous willful denial may soon be
over. And I would only say to our Nation divided, remember well and
hard how you cursed the truth. How you eagerly gave up your rationalization.
And how you so easily gave up your freedoms. But there is finally light
and we now need your lucidness more than ever, for this
root of treachery
is unbelievalby engrained into our society and
even our laws.


Educate yourselves. Read my book. Visit some
websites. Watch the internet blockbuster LooseChange2.
Go see Aaron Russo's new movie America
- from Freedom to Fascism
. Find out why and where your opinions
were created and for the sake of America, re-evaluate your rational.


Estanislao Carter,
www.ealchemy.org and books at
www.lulu.com/ealchemy



 




Want to review or comment on this article?
Click here to login!


Need a FREE Reader Membership?
Click here for your Membership!