AuthorsDen.com   Join Free! | Login    
   Popular! Books, Stories, Articles, Poetry
Where Authors and Readers come together!

SIGNED BOOKS    AUTHORS    eBOOKS new!     BOOKS    STORIES    ARTICLES    POETRY    BLOGS    NEWS    EVENTS    VIDEOS    GOLD    SUCCESS    TESTIMONIALS

Featured Authors:  Richard Orey, iKaren Dunn, iPinckney Rivers, iM. R. Mathias, iPaul Williams, iGwendolyn Thomas Gath, iWilliam Cottringer, i

  Home > Language > Articles Popular: Books, Stories, Articles, Poetry     

Virginia J Allum

· + Follow Me
· Contact Me
· Books
· Articles
· Blog
· 22 Titles
· Save to My Library
· Share with Friends!
·
Member Since: Jun, 2012

Virginia J Allum, click here to update your pages on AuthorsDen.




Featured Book
The Rebecca Bride
by Charlene Tess

Synopsis Zeke Milligan is stuck between a rock and a hard place. He is desperately in love with Lynn, but a dark secret from his past continues to rear its ugly head...  
BookAds by Silver
Gold and Platinum Members



Responsible (medical) Officers: should they test language competence?
by Virginia J Allum   
Rated "G" by the Author.
Last edited: Monday, July 02, 2012
Posted: Monday, July 02, 2012

  Print   Save    Follow    Share 

Recent articles by
Virginia J Allum

What kind of glossary development will help EMP students become confident w
What does English for Medical Purposes cover?
Other English Language Specialities: LSP and CLIL
Medical terms with the prefix dys-
Using health-related articles to produce teaching resources
English for Medical Purposes: Free Online Resources
Publishers of English for Medical Purposes books
           >> View all

Responsible Officers in the UK are charged with checking the language competence of overseas-trained doctors. What assessment tests are being used or should be used?

 On 17 May, 2012, The NHS employers website published  an article called ‘Consultation on responsible officer regulations’  advising that surveys for public opinion on the amendments to regulations relating to Responsible Officers (RO) are to be submitted to the Department of Health by 13 July 2012. According to the website, consultation by the Department of Health will be in three areas, namely:

1. Deciding the role of the NHS Commissioning Board in nominating and appointing Responsible Officers 
2. Deciding the role of Responsible Officers  in assessing the language competence of overseas-trained doctors who are working in England.
3. Establishing whether a local authority will come within the definition of 'designated bodies' if the local authority has a connection to a public health doctor and whether a local authority could act as a responsible officer for this doctor.
 
As an EMP (English for Medical Purposes) specialist, my main interest is in the area of language competency assessment of overseas trained doctors. The background to this issue is the fact that currently in the UK only non-EU healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, dentists etc) have their language skills assessed. I am a non-EU nurse who had to pass each of the four skills of an IELTS (International English Language Testing System) at a minimum of 7.0. English is my first language. The UK is unusual in comparison with other English-speaking countries in that EU health care professionals do not have their English language skills tested before working in the UK.
 
Recently, this anomaly was reviewed at European Parliament level which started the process of the testing of all overseas-trained doctors but not all overseas-trained nurses for various, to my mind, bizarre reasons. Leaving this aside, I was interested to read Chapter Three of the ‘Consultation document: Responsible officers in the new health architecture’  
 
Looking through the chapter, I came across a few points which raised questions in my mind about the effectiveness of the current system and likely effectiveness of the mooted system.
First, I read that the  The National Health Service (Performers Lists) Regulations 2004 already require Primary Care Trusts (PCTs)  to refuse to admit overseas-trained doctors, dentists or opticians to a Performers List if the PCT does  not feel that the applicant ‘has the appropriate English language knowledge to enable them to carry out their function as a doctor in the PCT’s area.’ The idea being that the The Performers List ensures that the overseas doctor is ‘fit for practice’ i.e can work safely by being able to communicate effectively in English and therefore safe patient care is ensured.
 
Responsible officers in England (other countries in the UK have different regulations) have the same or similar functions to the PCTs . However, whilst ROs have a duty to check that
 medical practitioners have the required qualifications and experience for the job, there is no specific duty to check language competency.
 
On the other hand, The Coalition programme for government  committed to ensure that foreign ‘healthcare professionals’ (did this include nurses?)  have an adequate level of language competence so that NHS patients are not put at risk  or harmed because of communication break downs.   
 
Looking at the situation of doctors (as the nurses’ situation hangs in the balance) ,The Coalition agreement would tend to suggest that the RO legislation needs to be amended to make it clear that the function of a Responsible Officer explicitly extends to the testing of language competency before an overseas-trained doctor can set foot in a hospital and communicate with patients and colleagues. My first thought was, ‘ How is this to be done?’
The following section (section 3.7) talks about assessing language in a ‘proportionate way’ including a ‘proportionate use of language tests’. My next thought was ,’ Which language tests are they thinking of ? This is not explained or mentioned from what I can see.
The only reference to ‘how this competence would be assessed’ seems to be in stating that guidance would be sought from the GMC and the NHS Commissioning Board. ‘Guidance could also be amended quickly to take account of changing circumstances, such as any scheme intended to apply across healthcare professionals more generally’.  I presumed this to refer to nursing.
 
Again, the proposal that ROs will notify concerns regarding language competency to the GMC does not include any clues about how the RO will assess language competency. 
Cost was also alluded to but felt to be quite low, as ‘Under the existing system PCTs and NHS Trusts are required to undertake checks’ so it was felt there would be no change in test costs. But, I still felt I was missing something. What tests? My understanding was that there is no testing of EU doctors allowed so how can there be existing costs for ‘checks’ or are these ‘checks’ informal conversations with prospective doctors which are costed as admin time? 
My final musings were about the ROs and their own competence to assess language competency. Surely this should be done by language specialists? If not, why did I have to undertake an IELTS test ( a language test administered by language specialists) before I was able to apply for nursing registration in the UK?  It is already a silly situation whereby doctors and nurses (and other health care practitioners) from English-speaking countries who most probably count English as their first language have to front up for an IELTS test when their European colleagues who probably do not count English as their first language, do not. Having said that, in most English-speaking countries, everyone fronts up to prove their language competency before registering as a doctor or nurse or similar.
 
 In Canada, nurses sit a CELBAN Canadian English Language Benchmark Assessment for Nurses   which specifically tests the ability to speak the English required for the healthcare environment . In other words, EMP. The question of whether  IELTS is an appropriate language test for healthcare workers is another issue, however, at least it is a language test of some sort and of international recognition.
Many NHS hospitals have English classes for overseas doctors and nurses already working in the system. Obviously the need is recognized but it would seem a little like closing the stable door a bit too late.
 

Web Site: English for Nursing and Healthcare



Want to review or comment on this article?
Click here to login!


Need a FREE Reader Membership?
Click here for your Membership!


Popular Language Articles
  1. CONJUGATION OF VERBS
  2. Places That End in 'A'
  3. NO HABLO ESPANOL !
  4. Miscellaneous 'Stuff'
  5. EPITAPH
  6. How cool is cool?

Bridging the Gap: Police - Japanese, Third Edition by Robert Wood

Nonverbal Japanese language communicator primarily for English speakers. Easy to use reference. Proven and effective tool...  
BookAds by Silver, Gold and Platinum Members

Object Marking in Japanese: A Self-study Programmed Lesson by Robert Wood

This programmed, self-paced lesson focuses exclusively on the use of postpostions (ga and (w)o) with grammatical objects in the Japanese language without wavering or getting off tr..  
BookAds by Silver, Gold and Platinum Members

Authors alphabetically: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Featured Authors | New to AuthorsDen? | Add AuthorsDen to your Site
Share AD with your friends | Need Help? | About us


Problem with this page?   Report it to AuthorsDen
AuthorsDen, Inc. All rights reserved.