Blogs by Gregory K Sams
Astrology is bunk - scientifically proven! Oh Really?
8/14/2009 4:11:24 AM
[ Flag as Inappropriate ]
Astronomers cling onto a church-imposed taboo about considering astrology, thinking they are basing their prejudice on science.
Had to laugh when I read this story on the BBC news page:
Star year chief tackles astrology
The UK director of the International Year of Astronomy is to give a talk on his debates with astrologers about their beliefs. Glasgow Science Centre-based Steve Owens, a former pupil at Culloden Academy, is returning to the Highlands to give the talk on Friday in Nairn. Highlands Astronomical Society (HAS) and Moray group Sigma are hosting the event. Year of Astronomy events are running throughout 2009.
HAS said until a few hundred years ago astrology and astronomy were often held in equal regard, with astronomers such as Galileo practicing astrology alongside their astronomy and mathematics.
However, the society said that advances in science had led astronomers to regard astrology as a pseudoscience.
I don't know much about astrology but I'd like to know just what "advances in science" had any bearing upon astronomer’s beliefs about the subject? As I recall, it was the Church that banned scientists from practicing astrology or anything else deemed to be occult. They, understandably, wanted to establish their monopolistic grip upon all things spiritually oriented.
This ongoing dismissal of astrology does seem odd, in light of today's recognition that something as minor as a butterfly's wing flap can have a major effect upon a weather system thousands of miles and several months away. The moon lifts oceans. The Sun swings some very big balls around it. Is it not conceivable that these 'bigger-than-butterfly' phenomenon could have an effect upon something as sensitive as a developing fetus?
I struck up a great friendship with Jonathan Cainer this weekend at the Big Chill in Herefordshire, and he was most affected by the ideas expressed in my book, Sun of gOd, about the living nature of celestial bodies. As an astrologer, I should think he would be since it indicates that there is, indeed, more at play than just gravitational forces, and sheds some light on just what.
Postscript - I met up with Jonathan Cainer a month later at another festival, where he made this 2-min video endorsement for my book.
More Blogs by Gregory K Sams
Why wage war for no reason? - Tuesday, January 04, 2011
Today's EU - Napoleon and Hitler would be proud. - Thursday, November 25, 2010
The Oracle at Delphi - was it, perhaps, oracular? - Wednesday, November 24, 2010
The American Contradiction - perfectly depressed - Wednesday, October 13, 2010
No God says Stephen Hawking - is there another option? - Friday, September 10, 2010
Why did the Roman Empire go Christian? - Wednesday, August 18, 2010
Study finds child obesity due to overeating - who'd have thought? - Friday, July 09, 2010
Peanut...peanut butter - my baby's made it big! - Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Surprise Exhibition at British Museum - Thursday, May 06, 2010
Dogshit or catshit? - Why I will never vote. - Friday, April 23, 2010
Christianity, a bureaucratic necessity at the time - Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Who are they kidding? (most of us) - Thursday, February 04, 2010
Whoopee - Happy times are here again! - Tuesday, January 26, 2010
The War Goes Well ! - Friday, January 15, 2010
Which came first - energy or life? - Tuesday, January 12, 2010
COPENHAGEN – do they give a damn? - Monday, December 14, 2009
Troops at war and soldiers in prison - Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Road safety – there's an elephant in the roundabout. - Thursday, November 05, 2009
MP’s expenses - what a diversion!!! - Thursday, November 05, 2009
The NHS - get healthy and we'll need less of it - not more! - Thursday, November 05, 2009
Astrology is bunk - scientifically proven! Oh Really? - Friday, August 14, 2009
How vegetative is the vegetable world? ... and other curious questions. - Monday, July 27, 2009