|
| Reviewed by Karen Palumbo |
6/9/2008 |
|
In the numerical sense no two can be the same, therefore numbers cold as it may seem. Many nations are moving to the same system, sad but more accurate....
Be always safe,
Karen |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewed by Jon Willey |
6/9/2008 |
|
| I sense a problem of semantics here. To have the choice of being a living number, or not being a living number. My choice would have me opting for the former, the number one choice! Peace. JMW |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewed by E T Waldron |
6/9/2008 |
|
| Must be hard to assimilate, Abdi Noor! My prayers are with you...ET |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewed by Karla Dorman, The StormSpinner |
6/9/2008 |
|
We are all numbers - sad to say - they've dehumanized us - well said, Abdi-Noor -
(((HUGS))) love and prayer, Karla. |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewed by Georg Mateos |
6/9/2008 |
|
Oh brother, not you too! ! ! don't get bureaucrats more ideas, next time you won't have a number, just one of those rows of black lines tattoed on your ass where they can sacn it with they laser and see who really you are. Please, don't complain I already got a tattoo and that's no fun.
Georg |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewed by Flying Fox Ted L Glines |
6/9/2008 |
|
Good one! And the problem with controling by numbers is that broadbased decisions are targeted at the center-line of that statistical analysis bell-curve (the norm). Decisions thus made are right for a small minority, and wrong for everybody else, especially if the decisions target that exact center-line. It's, more and more, all countries where statistics are replacing individuality.
Ted |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewed by Mr. Ed |
6/9/2008 |
|
| I think we are all just a number to someone in power, or to some powerful organization, today. Very sad. |
|
|
|
Bookmarks
Share
Print
Save