Planck's theory explained in detail by Planck himself in 1908. Includes abridged and non-abridged versions.
Buy your copy!
Max Planck delivered a series of eight lectures at Columbia University in 1908. Six of these lectures covered his now famous radiation theory. He received the Nobel prize for his accomplishment in 1915. The complete unabridged version is presented in this book. There is also a rather complete abridged version that was written by Dr. Weldon Vlasak that is presented in Chapter nine. In Chapter 10, Dr. Vlasak relates Planck's theories to modern theories. One of Planck's theories, that has received but little attention, was delivered in Planck's seventh lecture. There is a short introductory comment that has been added at the beginning of each lecture, along with a summary at the end of each chapter.
Now, how far have we advanced today toward the unification of our system of physics? The numerous independent domains of earlier physics now appear reduced to two; mechanics and electrodynamics, or, as on may say: the physics of material bodies and the physics of the ether. The former comprehends acoustics, phenomena in material bodies, and chemical phenomena; the latter, magnetism, optics and radiant heat. But is this division a fundamental one? This is a question of great consequence for the future development of physics. For myself, I beleive it must be answered in the negative and upon the following grounds: mechanics and electrodynamics cannot be sharply differentiated from each other. Does the process of light emission, for example, belong to mechanics or to electrodynamics? To which domain shall be assigned the laws of motion of electrons? At first glance, one may perhaps say: to electrodynamics, since with the electrons ponderable matter does not play any role. But let one direct his attention to the motion of free electrons in metals. There he will find, in the study of classical researches of H. A. Lorentz, for example, that the laws obeyed by the electrons belong rather to the kinetic theory of gases than to electrodynamics. In general, it appears to me the the original differences between processes in the ether and processes in material bodies are to be considered as dissapearing. Electrodynamics and mechanics are not so remarkably far apart, as has been considered to be the case by many people, who already speak of a conflict between the mechanical and the electrodynamic views of the world. ....
If, once the gulf between ether and matter be once bridged,what is the point of view which in the last analysis will best serve in the subdivision of the system of physics? The answer to this question will characterize the whole nature of the further development of our science.