Pseudoscience[s]
7153461395535[1]
7+1+5+3+4+6+1+3+9+5+5+3+5+1
58/13/4
4
Researched through Arithmancy Divination by
Bob Gray Smith
3,280,000 resultsAny time=
3+2+8= 13=1+3=4
Even the Computer amount agrees
 With
3,280,000
Pseudoscience[s]
NORTH AMERICAN---- informal be in accord; agree. "her facial expressions did not jive with what she was saying"
Pseudo
715546 = 28 = 2+8 =10 =.................. 1
Scholarship
43863191897 = 59 5+9 = 14 1+4 = .....5
Essence =5115535 = 25 = 2+5 = .........7
1+5+7 = 13 = 1+3 = 4
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
For broader coverage of this topic, see Pseudo-scholarship.
See also: List of topics characterized as pseudoscience
Part of a series on
Science
Essence
Pseudoscientfic
715346139552693 = 70 = 7
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience#Astronomy_and_space_sciences
Pseudomathematics
71534641285412931 =66 = 6+6 = 12 = 1+2 = 3
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=endc310437cd1cee1e7#!msg/sci.energy.hydrogen/vWyWxrmM5zI/IT6UDris4I4J

[show]
Branches
[show]
Society
[hide]
EducationFundingPseudosciencePolicySociology
Paranormal
Skepticism
Pseudoscience consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that are claimed to be both scientific and factual, but are incompatible with the scientific method.[1][Note 1] Pseudoscience is often characterized by contradictory, exaggerated or unfalsifiable claims; reliance on confirmation bias rather than rigorous attempts at refutation; lack of openness to evaluation by other experts; and absence of systematic practices when developing theories, and continued adherence long after they have been experimentally discredited. The term pseudoscience is considered pejorative[4] because it suggests something is being presented as science inaccurately or even deceptively. Those described as practicing or advocating pseudoscience often dispute the characterization.[2] 
The demarcation between science and pseudoscience has philosophical and scientific implications.[5] Differentiating science from pseudoscience has practical implications in the case of health care, expert testimony, environmental policies, and science education.[6] Distinguishing scientific facts and theories from pseudoscientific beliefs, such as those found in astrology, alchemy, alternative medicine, occult beliefs, religious beliefs, and creation science, is part of science education and scientific literacy.[6][7] 
Pseudoscience can be harmful. Anti-vaccine activists present pseudoscientific studies that falsely call into question the safety of vaccines. Homeopathic remedies with no active ingredients have been promoted as treatment for deadly disease
Old Man says and states that anything under the Sun if science doesn't see how it came about scintififcally then it's bound to be 'psedoscience or better put to better understand what's being said 'false-science.'[For the simple man is simple words.