Intelligence can be defined as…The Lack of Unintelligence.

7 AUG 2018
Doctor Swigmon Fwad, Kiwi

FWADIAN THEORY

Theories can never be proven. They can be critiqued, chagrined, argued and even laughed off, but once a theory is acknowledged as fact the metamorphosis is complete and the theory no longer exists.
Good theories tend to last the longest.

Intelligence can be defined as…The Lack of Unintelligence.
If the mind is devoid of unintelligence the only thing that can fill that void is intelligence.

There is nothing so certain as uncertainty.
A person may think he knows something and even take a guess or two.
But if that same person does not know something, he knows for certain that he does not know it and make no bones about it. If he were uncertain that he does not know it he may know it without knowing it.

Studies of an unintelligent mind show nothing. When we take away that nothing it is replaced by something…intelligence.
Something always replaces nothing.

This is where My theory of relativity comes to play. All things in the mind are relative to other things in the mind and fluctuate according to relative humidity within the mind’s core. Intelligence cannot coexist with unintelligence in the same brain cell. It must be one or the other. Therefore removal of one replaces it with the other.

Deranged doctors have been doing this for ages with lobotomies. They remove intelligence and replace it with unintelligence. We know that the reverse is just the opposite so in theory we could lobotomize an unintelligent mind and receive one of intellect.

That is one way to do it. I’ve tried the procedure several times with chimpanzees but it is really difficult to tell a dumb ape from a smart one.
I suppose other ways will evolve but that is no concern of mine. I am only here to say it can be done.

It is much easier for a student to suck out his/her untelligence and replace it with intelligence, than to study for years for intelligence and cram it into the brain alongside unintelligence.

One major factor of my theory must be considered. The amount of intelligence gained is directly proportional to the amount of unintelligence available. They replace each other on a 1/1 ratio.

Unfortunately modern science to date has no way of measuring unintelligence in humans, so accurate results are not realistic other than educated guesses, which are dependent upon the amount of unintelligence in the minds of the guessers.

It is not an exact science, but we do know that to replace enough unintelligence in a subject to have the outcome be that of a genius they would have to start as a total moron.
With that in mind I will have to say that genius is not within my grasp.
Now George on the other hand…

Swigmon Out,
Bye George
NoPo8
A mind is a terrible thing to be out of.