Failed Green Party candidate, Jill Stein may be the face of election recounts, but don't be fooled. Hillary Clinton and defeated Democrats are behind this scam.
After all of the media hysteria and condemnatory Democrat claptrap over Donald Trump’s refusal to concede the presidential election before a single vote had been cast, Hillary Clinton has now withdrawn her concession, refusing to accept the election results. Sound familiar? It should. It’s typical Democrat duplicity.
The last time a losing presidential candidate refused to accept the result of an election was, coincidently, also a Democrat. In 2000, Al Gore conceded and then retracted his concession. It was also the last time a Republican was elected to follow a dismal and corrupt two-term Democrat--the felonious buffoon, Bill Clinton. At least in 2000, the election was close. The state of Florida was the only state in contention. The November 2016 election was not close. Donald Trump won 306 electoral votes to Hillary Clinton’s 232.
At least, Al Gore stood up and faced humiliation like a--well--at least he stood up and faced humiliation himself. He did not use a surrogate to call for a recount, and then enjoin himself to the effort afterward.
The Green Party’s presidential candidate, Jill Stein, is now calling for recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, despite the facts that: nothing will change her poor performance and, she has no proof that anything amiss occurred. But in Wisconsin, anyone can request a recount for any reason or no reason. The petitioner simply has to fund the recount. Not surprisingly, Hillary Clinton has now joined Stein in the recount scheme. Donald Trump won Wisconsin’s electors by 22,177 votes.
Something reeks in the recount fiasco and it’s not Wisconsin cheese. Jill Stein claims that she has suspicions of computer hacking and anomalies. She has heard from a group of computer analysts and professors who claim to have noticed irregularities. Stein also points to the accusations of hacking of the computer system at DNC headquarters in August. Hillary Clinton blamed the Russians for the supposed DNC hacking. No evidence of Russian involvement has been found.
Donald Trump’s remarks were called reckless and irresponsible. His refusal to accept an a priori election result was condemned as dangerous. But he had documented proof of voter fraud efforts by Democrat activists. Weeks before the election, Project Veritas published several videos which showed Democrat operatives explaining how voter fraud is committed by moving people from state to state so that they can vote multiple times, and how illegal aliens are able to vote in some states.
Since November 8th, Democrat-funded protesters have been reminding us that Hillary Clinton received more popular votes than Donald Trump, but since America is not a democracy, that fact is irrelevant. It’s worth noting that the only people who refer to the United States of America as a democracy (usually, “our democracy”) are Democrat voters or politicians.
The Electoral College was a brilliant creation of the founders, formed to prevent regional tyranny. Only now that Democrats have lost, is California Democrat Senator Barbara Boxer calling for the abolition of the electoral college system. When Barack Hussein Obama won in 2008 and 2012, Boxer had no desire to alter the method by which we choose our presidents.
If there is anything to be learned from the 2016 election drama, it’s that we need uniform voting laws across all fifty states. Evidence of cause and reasonable demonstration of an effectual discrepancy should be required before election recounts are ordered. Also, we need consistent voter identification requirements nationwide. The only legitimate reason to oppose the positive identification of voters is to facilitate fraud. Marvel not that the very party that regularly perpetrates voter fraud and belligerently opposes voter photo identification laws is the party that habitually contests election results when they lose.
Americans cannot allow this to become the new normal--that Democrat candidates demand recounts and challenge every election in which they lose. Stein has raised twice as much money for recounting votes than she did during her entire election campaign. Green party candidate Jill Stein may be petitioner, but the Wisconsin election dispute has greasy Democrat fingerprints all over it.
|