AuthorsDen.com   Join | Login    
Where Authors and Readers come together!

SIGNED BOOKS    AUTHORS    BOOKS    SAMPLE CHAPTERS    AUDIOBOOKS    eBOOKS    STORIES    ARTICLES    POETRY    BLOGS    NEWS    VIDEOS    SUCCESS    TESTIMONIALS

Featured Authors:  William Manchee, iJohn Henning, iMiller Caldwell, iMargaret Mullings, iFrank Ryan, iBob Boze, iEdward Patterson, iSusan Smith, iMr. Ed, iRobert Wood, i

  Home > Political Science > Articles Popular: Books, Stories, Articles, Poetry      Authors: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z     

Mark M Lichterman

 Follow Me  

· Contact Me
· Success story
· Books
· Articles
· Poetry
· News
· Stories
· Blog
· 2,320 Titles
· 6,518 Reviews
· Save to My Library
· Share with Friends!
·
Member Since: Jun, 2008

Mark M Lichterman, click here to update your pages on AuthorsDen.


With Obama Who Needs Enemies
by Mark M Lichterman   
Rated "G" by the Author.
     
Last edited: Saturday, September 5, 2009
Posted: Saturday, September 5, 2009

Recent articles by
Mark M Lichterman

• Deno, Donnie & Frank?
• A Pubic Dog
• Murphy’s Law
• God Bless America
• California Gun Laws (Purchasing & Obtaining)
           >> View all

President Obama can ban the phrase "war on terror" but he cannot ban the terrorists' war on us. That war continues, so there is no reason to turn terrorists loose before it ends.

                          With Obama, Who Needs Enemies

                                 Give Terrorists Rights??

 

 

 

Survival Optional 
By Thomas Sowell
        
It used to be said that self-preservation is the first law of nature. But much of what has been happening in recent times in the United States, and in Western civilization in general, suggests that survival is taking a back seat to the shibboleths of political correctness.

We have already turned loose dozens of captured terrorists, who have resumed their terrorism. Why? Because they have been given "rights" that exist neither in our laws nor under international law.
 

These are not criminals in our society, entitled to the protection of the Constitution of the United States. They are not prisoners of war entitled to the protection of the Geneva Convention.
 

There was a time when people who violated the rules of war were not entitled to turn around and claim the protection of those rules. German soldiers who put on U.S. military uniforms, in order to infiltrate American lines during the Battle of the Bulge, were simply lined up against a wall and shot.
 

Nobody even thought that this was a violation of the Geneva Convention. American authorities filmed the mass executions. Nobody dreamed up fictitious "rights" for these enemy combatants who had violated the rules of war. Nobody thought we had to prove that we were nicer than the Nazis by bending over backward.
 
Bending over backward is a very bad position from which to try to defend yourself. Nobody in those days confused bending over backward with "the rule of law," as Barack Obama did recently. Bending over backward is the antithesis of the rule of law. It is depriving the people of the protection of their laws, in order to pander to mushy notions among the elite.
 
Even under the Geneva Convention, enemy soldiers have no right to be turned loose before the war is over. Terrorists-- "militants" or "insurgents" for those of you who are squeamish-- have declared open-ended war against America. It is open-ended in time and open-ended in methods, including beheadings of innocent civilians.
 
President Obama can ban the phrase "war on terror" but he cannot ban the terrorists' war on us. That war continues, so there is no reason to turn terrorists loose before it ends. They chose to make it that kind of war. We don't need to risk American lives to prove that we are nicer than they are.
 

The great Supreme Court justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said that law is not some "brooding omnipresence in the sky." It is a set of explicit rules by which human beings structure their lives and their relationships with one another.
 
Those who choose to live outside those laws, whether terrorists or pirates, can be-- and have been-- shot on sight. Squeamishness is neither law nor morality. And moral exhibitionism is beneath contempt, when it sacrifices the safety of those who live within the law for the sake of self-satisfied preening, whether in editorial offices or in the White House.
 
 As if it is not enough to turn cutthroats loose to cut throats again, we are now contemplating legal action against Americans who wrung information about international terrorist operations out of captured terrorists.
 
Does nobody think ahead to what this will mean-- for many years to come-- if people trying protect this country from terrorists have to worry about being put behind bars themselves? Do we need to have American intelligence agencies tip-toeing through the tulips when they deal with terrorists?
 
In his visit to CIA headquarters, President Obama pledged his support to the people working there and said that there would be no prosecutions of CIA agents for prior actions. Then he welshed on that in a matter of hours by leaving the door open for such prosecutions, which the left has been clamoring for, both inside and outside of Congress.
 
Repercussions extend far beyond issues of the day. It is bad enough that we have a glib and sophomoric narcissist in the White House. What is worse is that whole nations that rely on the United States for their security see how easily our president welshes on his commitments. So do other nations, including those with murderous intentions toward us, our children and grandchildren.


Want to review or comment on this article?


Need a FREE Reader Membership?
Reviewed by Georg Mateos
Reviewed on September 6, 2009
We have in Scandinavia our own local grow of "correct optimists", they want DIALOGUE with Taliban, al Quaeda, Hamas and any other bomber thrower which hates the world outside their mosque, even other mosques.
They want a peaceful dialogue of cooperation for peace in the world with the people that condemn an unholy American soldier for returning fire from a mosque, but that bomb that mosque themselves because they are not as crazy as they are.
We could have nuked Ping Yang in the 50's and we wouldn't have Nam or 9/11 by showing that we had the big stick and will use it. Period.

Georg


Reviewed by John Martin
Reviewed on September 6, 2009
He is extending our rights to those who would take our freedoms away from us. That's like lending your enemy a gun to shoot you with. That's right folks, pay no attention to that man in the white house...What time is American Idol on again?

Popular Political Science Articles
  1.  02 Substack Interviewed on Political P
  2.  Astrological Commentary On The 2016 El
  3.  We the Pimples... (or) a Child's Garde
  4.  Election Time USA and the Theatre of t
  5.  Fatuous Beyond Absurdity
  6.  A Thought Experiment About The Virus
  7.  Globalization
  8.  South Carolina’s Medicaid Travesty
  9.  Puppetmaster
  10.  Winners and Losers
  11.  U.S. Reliance on China’s Green Energy:
  12.  Danuta!
  13.  Whatever Happened to Journalistic Stan
  14.  A Scrappy Lot
  15.  A Special Invitation from Donald Trump
  16.  A Modest Proposal: Sharing Social Secu
  17.  When Trump Leaves
  18.  Exposing My Naivete
  19.  Fascism Loosely Defined for Current El
  20.  An Interesting experience AtThe Voting
  21.  No Kings Day
  22.  Fascism In A Nutshell
  23.  Cheney Has Failed Miserably
  24.  To Be A Patriot
  25.  When Trump Shakes Down the Media

Free Book Review Program
Select a book to read and review today!

Be Afraid. Beaveree Eh Frayed v6 by RickthePoetWarrior

From the land of the milked and honeyed here’s a few political faux pas and a bit of attitude exposed to the harsh light of a Canadian who actually has their own opinion.  
Member BookAds

Be Afraid. Beaveree Eh Frayed v6 by RickthePoetWarrior

From the land of the milked and honeyed here’s a few political faux pas and a bit of attitude exposed to the harsh light of a Canadian who actually has their own opinion.  
Member BookAds

FREE DOWNLOAD Empire and War by Sam Vaknin

The antecedents and aftermath of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the role of the United States in international affairs.  
Member BookAds