Assertions, Lies, and Tyranny
Every day we are bombarded with economic assertions. Examples are: Tax cuts to the rich create GDP, and jobs, and higher incomes, and more taxes. These assertions are 99 percent false. And when made with malice aforethought, they are blatant lies. When made with contempt, they are tyrannical lies.
Here is he 99 percent truthful counterpart: The great force behind GDP, jobs, incomes, and taxes is spending. Tax cuts to the wealthy are saved, not spent. Savings goes into stocks, bonds, and real estate. Those are the elements of personal wealth.
In contrast, spending is how profits are generated, and ultimately how wealth is created. We buy things that produce profits, that pay wages, that buy more things and pay taxes, that buy more things, that…it goes on and on in an endless circle. But the math is easy: Consumer spending, plus Government spending, plus Business spending equal GDP. Spenders are the great creators of GDP, and jobs, and incomes, and taxes. Here is the math:
M1 x V1= GDP [1]
Therefore: $3.4 trillion x 5.7 = $19.4 trillion
Now if a wealthy person gets a new tax cut (say $10 million) does he or she rush out to buy a Big Mac, or fill up his gas tank, or pay his rent? No way! He buys more stocks, or bonds, or another apartment complex. Those investments add to his net worth, but do nothing for the economy. Tax cuts to the wealthy come at the expense to all others.
But, the wealthy argue, we pay 67 percent of all income taxes, while most of those in the bottom 50 percent pay nothing. So don’t tell us we don’t pay our fair share.
You don’t pay your fair share, and that is a fact. The reason is because you receive 90 percent of all the wealth and income, while paying only 67 percent of income taxes. Conversely, those in the bottom 50 percent make only 1 percent of the income, and hold less than 1 percent of the wealth. All live in or near poverty.
Here is the bigger picture: When all the taxes are considered (local, state, and national, including gasoline, income, Social Security, Medicare, sales, real estate, rents, entertainment, tolls, special assessments), something very revealing takes place: Everyone pays just about the same overall rate. And that rate is about 35 percent of incomes.
Now think about those workers in the bottom 50 percent of the income curve who make $20,000 per year. They pay $7,000 per year in total taxes. Explain to all of them why they need to pay more taxes, why their families must go without medical insurance, or food stamps, or unemployment insurance, and why education is beyond their reach. Better yet, explain it to your conscience, then to your God.
----------------------------------------
1] M1 is money in circulation, V1 is its annual turnover rate.
Rebecca
I would like to add government jobs. They are good, real, jobs. Government jobs tend to be stable, with benefits and are rewarding. Government jobs by their nature, serve all of society, regardless of their financial or other attributes. Spending government money on "privatizing" with offers of "excellence" and "improved" service is a nasty little lie. Here's why. Private firms are focused on profit. They quickly move from "serving all" to serving what would be called, "low hanging fruit," leaving all the rest without any services at all. This suits the mindset of the rich and the politicians funded by the rich. Because the numbers can always show "excellence" and saving money, while hiding those left behind.
Good paying government jobs mean solid, taxpaying citizens (bureaucrats?). Privatized businesses are prone to outsourcing, laying off employees and not providing adequate benefits. Lies about security lead to building up armies and policing at a tremendous cost and loss of freedom.
A Department of Education is much more appropriate for the well-being of people than a Department of War.
Ron