Needed: More Facts, Less Assertions
Distinguishing facts from assertions, opinions, surmise, guesses, and hunches is one of the most powerful intellectual skills anyone can develop. It’s the backbone of critical thinking, to good decision‑making, and to a healthy forum of public discourses about a variety of very critical issues
The problem with assertions, in general, is that they could be accepted as truth when major policy issues are at risk; or when a person’s life is at stake; or trillions of dollars could be put to better use with an accurate set of premises. Yet day in and day out, too many people fall victim to such faulty reasoning, and very bad decisions are made with devastatingly bad results. Moreover, spotting such assertions is relatively easy,. Think of all the faulty evidence—and the bad decisions that emanate from Congress, from the heads of major departments, and from the White House. It is not a bad leap of judgment to consider this mental deficiency is symptomatic also of human thinking from around the world. Note: A large sample size is, itself, an example of a good source of evidence.
Here is what Microsoft’s Co-Pilot had to reveal about this subject:
How to Tell Facts from Everything Else
1. Facts
• Verifiable: You can check them against reliable evidence.
• Independent of belief: They remain true whether or not anyone agrees.
• Repeatable: Different observers can confirm them.
Test: Can I prove this with credible sources, data, or direct observation?
2. Assertions
• Claims presented as truth, but without evidence.
• They might be true , but they’re not supported yet.
Test: Is this statement being asserted without proof? If so, it’s an assertion, not a fact.
3. Opinions
• Subjective judgments, shaped by values, preferences, or interpretations.
• They can be informed or uninformed.
Test: Does this depend on personal taste, values, or perspective?
4. Surmise
• A tentative conclusion drawn from limited evidence.
• More thoughtful than a guess, but still not solid.
Test: Is this a “best guess” based on incomplete information?
5. Guesses
• No evidence required—just speculation.
• Could be right by accident.
Test: Is this just someone taking a shot in the dark?
6. Hunches
• Intuition-based feelings or instincts.
• Often shaped by experience, but not by explicit reasoning.
Test: Is this based on a feeling rather than articulated evidence?
Why This Distinction Matters
If you treat guesses like facts, you make bad choices. If you treat facts like opinions, you ignore reality.
Stronger Critical Thinking
Separating evidence from belief helps you:
• Evaluate argument
• Detect manipulation
• Avoid being misled by confident but unsupported claims
3. Healthier Conversations
People often argue because they confuse:
• “This is true ” with
• “I believe this”
Once you sort those out, disagreements become clearer and more productive.
4. Protection Against Misinformation
Modern information environments reward confidence, not accuracy. Being able to say “Wait—what category does this claim belong to?” is a shield.
5. Intellectual Integrity
You become someone who:
• Updates beliefs when evidence changes
• Recognizes uncertainty
• Communicates clearly about what is known vs. suspected
That’s a rare and valuable skill.
6. A Simple Habit That Works Every Time
Whenever you encounter a claim, ask:
“What would I need to see to know this is true ?”
• If the answer is evidence, you’re dealing with a factual claim.
• If the answer is nothing, it’s an opinion.
• If the answer is ‘I don’t know’, it’s a guess or hunch.
• If the answer is ‘some evidence, but not enough’, it’s a surmise or assertion.
Thr last topic cuts through a surprising amount of noise. Not only that, master these few premises, and use them, and you could become a veritable walking version of Socrates’ memorable teaching: “The unexamined life is not worth living.”
Thanks to AI for making it clear and concise in outline form without a lot of other verbiage in the way.
Keep sharing these gems with us
Ron
Rebecca