Lewis W Findley, click
here to update your pages on AuthorsDen!
Lyndon Larouche September 8,1922-Feb12,2019 by Lewis W Findley
Rated "G" by the Author.
Last
edited: Wednesday, February 13, 2019
Posted: Wednesday, February 13, 2019
I remember hearing about Lyndon LaRouche when I was working at theSavannah Airport in the mid 1980s. Then I first saw him on an interview on NBC news , he became indignant mid interview and exclaimed “ you are a bunch of liars. How can I talk to a drug trafficker like you? “ I thought “ whoa! This is one empassioned man” I wanted to find out all I could about him. I did lots of research and found out a lot. He was definitely what many people called a conspiracy theorist. One to certainly speak his mind about Henry Kissinger, and in no uncertain terms. And never mind the truth he spoke about the British Royal Family. Mr LaRouche was what many would call a contradiction in terms. I consider myself to be that as well. 96 wisely spent years. Thank you for your tireless serviceLyndon LaRouche, and Rest In Peace sir. There is nothing wrong with being extreme
Very certainly an interesting man. I was at a conference for the 100 year starship of years ago when I met a young man who handed me a grand plan proposes part of the platform for Lyndon's run for president (many times). It involved using nuclear bombs to root water from the Yukon all the way to Mexico. Basically reengineer and revitalize (terraform?) North America by the use of drastic infrastructure. Thus, creating jobs, using massive engineering and structures to create a new kind of economy and prosperity. I found it rather cool stuff. But once we mess with nature, like we are finding out with global warming, we may not be able to reverse the damage in the wake.
From the land of the milked and honeyed here’s a few political faux pas and a bit of attitude exposed to the harsh light of a Canadian who actually has their own opinion.
This is a political treatise that deals with the China issue from a completely new perspective. Disparaging as he may sound, from page to page, toward "the old system" and the Communist Party's various wiles, the author demonstrates his mysteriously
Ron