AuthorsDen.com   Join | Login    
Where Authors and Readers come together!

SIGNED BOOKS    AUTHORS    BOOKS    SAMPLE CHAPTERS    AUDIOBOOKS    eBOOKS    STORIES    ARTICLES    POETRY    BLOGS    NEWS    VIDEOS    SUCCESS    TESTIMONIALS

Featured Authors:  MORGAN ST. JAMES, iDavid Young, iJay Dubya, iBob Boze, iEdward Patterson, iLinda Alexander, iConnie Amarel, iOdin odin@aflx.com, iElisabeth Barstowe, iJeff Ovall, i

  Home > Political Science > Articles Popular: Books, Stories, Articles, Poetry      Authors: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z     

Mark M Lichterman

 Follow Me  

· Contact Me
· Success story
· Books
· Articles
· Poetry
· News
· Stories
· Blog
· 2,320 Titles
· 6,518 Reviews
· Save to My Library
· Share with Friends!
·
Member Since: Jun, 2008

Mark M Lichterman, click here to update your pages on AuthorsDen.


Social Security History
by Mark M Lichterman   
Rated "G" by the Author.
     
Last edited: Friday, April 18, 2014
Posted: Friday, April 18, 2014

Recent articles by
Mark M Lichterman

• Deno, Donnie & Frank?
• A Pubic Dog
• Murphy’s Law
• God Bless America
• California Gun Laws (Purchasing & Obtaining)
           >> View all

Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants though they've put not a penny into it.
A: That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.

History Lesson on Your Social Security Card 

Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn't know this.  It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your family
and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.

Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
 
Since nearly everyone in the
United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anywayand the message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION, was removed.

     you may be interested in the following:

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically
controlled House and Senate.

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
 
A: The Democratic Party. 

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the 'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US 


Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

A: That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA),the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!
 
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. 
          But it's worth a try.
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. He promised:
1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary, No longer Voluntary

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program,
Now 7.65% on the first $90,000

3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year.
 No longer tax deductible
 
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and, Under Johnson the money was moved to The General Fund and Spent.

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income. Under Clinton & Gore Up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed.

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put away'    

Actions speak louder than bumper stickers


PLEASE DO KEEP THIS ONE ROLLING ACROSS THE COUNTRY. HOPEFULLY IT WILL OPEN A FEW EYES and CAUSE CONGRESS TO START A TREND TO CORRECT THE DAMAGE DONE!!!!!!!


Want to review or comment on this article?


Need a FREE Reader Membership?
Reviewed by E Phillips
Reviewed on May 5, 2014
Well, one of your statements is true. The others are easy to check to see if they are true. And nearly all of yours are false. Of course, you are not the author, but when you post somebody else's baloney, you should at least check it out yourself. I won't go item by item through this mess, but here are a couple of observations: Nobody can draw retirement benefits from Social Security unless he/she is a legal resident who paid into the programs for 40 quarters, and meets age requirements. Anyone here illegally cannot draw one dime regardless of how much they paid into the program. Also, Congress may legally spend all excess allocations in any given year above the payout to recipients. There is no Trust Fund to be raided. It was never set up that way. Congress has indeed spent some $4.8 trillion above the amounts they have set aside for benefits (from both political parties), and we would all be better off if they had not. This amount shows up in accounting procedures as "intra governmental debt," an amount that will never be paid because we owe it to ourselves. Oh yes, the taxable amount is now up to $110,000, and it is 12.25 percent, with 6.125 percent paid by individuals and 6.125 percent paid by employers.

Reviewed by Kathleen McDonald
Reviewed on April 24, 2014
No privatized social security.

Kathy

Reviewed by Ronald Hull
Reviewed on April 19, 2014
That is damaging. I believe in fairness. It seems that special interests have always tinkered with the tax laws to get whatever benefit they needed. Do you think if Social Security is privatized it will be better? All the privatized government services that I know of tend to cost more and provide less.

Ron

Popular Political Science Articles
  1.  02 Substack Interviewed on Political P
  2.  Astrological Commentary On The 2016 El
  3.  We the Pimples... (or) a Child's Garde
  4.  Election Time USA and the Theatre of t
  5.  Fatuous Beyond Absurdity
  6.  A Thought Experiment About The Virus
  7.  Globalization
  8.  South Carolina’s Medicaid Travesty
  9.  Puppetmaster
  10.  Winners and Losers
  11.  U.S. Reliance on China’s Green Energy:
  12.  Danuta!
  13.  Whatever Happened to Journalistic Stan
  14.  A Scrappy Lot
  15.  A Special Invitation from Donald Trump
  16.  A Modest Proposal: Sharing Social Secu
  17.  When Trump Leaves
  18.  Exposing My Naivete
  19.  Fascism Loosely Defined for Current El
  20.  An Interesting experience AtThe Voting
  21.  No Kings Day
  22.  Fascism In A Nutshell
  23.  Cheney Has Failed Miserably
  24.  To Be A Patriot
  25.  When Trump Shakes Down the Media

Free Book Review Program
Select a book to read and review today!

Tyrann(y)asaurus (w)Rex v4 by RickthePoetWarrior

That I hope soon to be extinct dinosaur, our government, is bludgeoned and beaten as thoroughly as the freedom of the law lets me without jail time.  
Member BookAds

Tyrann(y)asaurus (w)Rex v4 by RickthePoetWarrior

That I hope soon to be extinct dinosaur, our government, is bludgeoned and beaten as thoroughly as the freedom of the law lets me without jail time.  
Member BookAds

FREE DOWNLOAD Empire and War by Sam Vaknin

The antecedents and aftermath of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the role of the United States in international affairs.  
Member BookAds