cosmologyemma.pdf (Article) - 2/22/2017 7:07:24 AM
While I understand the general conclusion arrived at as a result of these calculations, I do not understand the calculations and their importance to our understanding that seems to be better shirred by better instruments like the Hubble telescope and other measuring devices being launched.
Ron
Gravity has been misunderstood for a century (Article) - 2/15/2017 5:55:13 AM
As a result of pasting your text from either a recent version of Microsoft Word or a membership that does not allow formatting, trying to read your article was as dense as the molten iron at the center of the earth, combined with the ends of each line being cut off.
But I attempted to read it anyway. I am fond of physics but find that discussions of this type are reserved for mathematicians and physicists. Perhaps the best way to describe the concepts that you are attempting to convey would be through diagrams and/or illustrations rather than terms that are used only in scientific fields like astrophysics--requiring definition of each term.
That said, if you have discovered a flaw in Einstein's understanding of gravity, have you created a fix for it in the mathematics? Have you found a use for it in understanding cosmology? I think the most important thing in writing work like this is to be able to summarize and present your conclusions in an effective and meaningful way.
I once was most interested in working for NASA in understanding the effects of gravity on the human body as we leave the relatively constant gravity of our mother Earth. I wasn't able to enter the field like you did because the Apollo project was winding down and the shuttle project had not started. I understand that many are working on the problems of gravity on living organisms right now.
While it may not be important currently, your contributions to understanding gravity may be needed and important to our future.
Ron
