The underlying question American industry has to ask itself. Why are people given a hard time for conditions that are not related to their job performance? The disaster of sharing management, you asked your self, why is it wrong to want to do your job right? Life in its present form of high tech has been developed by mostly low tech human welfare personality. It is never clear in life which direction should be driven toward because the simple fact becomes complicated by the environment of social and political motivation.
Today has been an interesting type of day. The Operations Manager has been put on special assignment for the next three months. He was replaced by a junior acting manager. All organizations expect to be professional, but upper management does not back or support professional approach. This has caused a strange mix and adds frustration to any changes of positions.
The underlying question American industry has to ask itself. Why are they treating people that want to perform, in such a manner? Why are people given a hard time for conditions that are not related to their job performance? Why is it wrong to want to do your job right? Professionalism with understanding and performance cannot be mandated. Is it wrong to perform with expectations of wanting to do thing right?
These are the questions that American management must learn to not only answer, but deal with by resolving these issues. Management has accepted results, by pure default and lacks the understanding of what the people’s performances are really based on. You find people fighting the tide of dissension among managers, because they themselves lack knowledge, but are in the power of control. This causes inner conflict, frustration and tends to lose direction and purpose. These situations are not based on verbal words or written vague details of accomplishments, because true professionalism is based on strict guidelines.
The disaster of sharing management effects performance and understanding about what the problems are, but more important, how to resolve them, has to be addressed under this type of feeling. The by-product of this concept is simple, once someone doesn’t perform accordingly, pure frustration takes hold. Resulting in being put aside, and no longer a part of a team, or simply stated, an outcast. But in reality, management is forced to look at it and try to understand, even though it’s not within their realization of understanding.
Man is here to serve. Why are there but a few that understand what serving means? Why use energy to create something wrong when you can use the same or sometimes less energy to create it right? Inner strength is guidance. Knowledge and experience are the tools. The results are a combination of the two.
Ignorance has caused this type of concept, because upper management believes that the people they have under them, are in control. The workers believe that upper management is in command and with it comes the question, how did they derive and achieve this control status? How does anyone make them aware of what they are doing and it is not what they believe it to be? Leaving you wondering, does it really matter?
The industry regardless of its tasks is a by-product of the people in it. Making the situation quiet complex, because the people working with on the ground floor recognize and know that wanting to do it right, is correct and the only way.
What complicates all this is that middle and upper management by default are spared this input and never gain this information. They receive lip service with false and outright deception, again by lack of understanding of their reporting media. Why then do people strike out, when they don’t conform? Conforming seems to be the pressure that does not allow making parts or product within the approved concepts.
At the same time any failure or product returned is perceived as miss handling, miss treatment and other types of excuses are used for past poor performance. If you know what is going on, you become an outcast, because by recognizing that fact you have set them up. What the real world creates has automatically put you out into that imaginary domain. This concept is perceived only by those when they choose not to perform within their own weak character. No way can this concept continue, but at the same time, no way can it be discontinued.
Where does this leave someone that is in that situation? What strength does man extract from within itself to be constantly right, but accepted for being constantly wrong? Knowing if you give in, you become a part of them, but knowing that you’re right, you keep fighting, and then you’re considered an out cast.
The question of survival in industry is only matched by the survival that you require to stay within yourself. Why this drive is in such a small group of dedicated professionals has never been defined. Man cannot give in or at least the feeling, it would be a type of temptation if you did. The base should be on the concept of performance, established on commitment, not perfection. This responsibility is clearly understood and expressed in both work and contact made.
Why then has man conveniently learned to adapt to the devious ways of accomplishment, without care of the commitment? These questions are burning ones that can only be answered by being weak and finding the easy way to accomplish something that is the hard way. It is quiet possible that society feeds on this concept, where deception is required, and poor performance is rated as normal as or better than average.
So society which we are all a part of has responded in wanting accomplishment and allowing others to pay for something they will never receive. Why is being a martyr considered normal for some people? Everybody looks at it and says, you know it’s not going to do any good. No body cares. You’re fighting the system but it still goes on. What drives people, comes from within, it cannot be explained, it cannot be defined, maybe its just pure determination on their part. But if it’s wrong, it can never be right, because if it was right there would be no problem. So it is possible that people self generate their own conflict in order for them to highlight it.
The reason people struggle with their present position is because they are considered a purest by their peers. This condition is related because when you believe and someone is told to do a job or meet a spelled out requirement. You must meet those requirements. The biggest thing people have been fighting, are the political aspects of any job. Friendship and understanding conflict because they might not appear to be tied into that concept. In order for people to succeed they must get involved in the one area that is mostly despised and that is politics. Refusal to kiss ass and do what you are told regardless of consequences has been and is considered a weakness in our present society.
The pure definition of this weakness is unclear, because everybody talks and states, that thing have to be right, law and order and justice. All this is a mix which comes out as pure political motivation. So we the unknown understands what the words don’t mean. It is difficult to exist in this type of environment, where you’re considered an outcast by trying to do what everyone is telling you to. Requirements are conveniently twisted through political motivation to accept an inferior product, by our political society. This appears to have long-lasting effects on both the public and the work place.
It is never clear in life which direction should be driven toward because the simple fact becomes complicated by the environment of social and political motivation. This affliction is missing one of the most basic problems of any lifestyle and that is communication. Everyone wants to communicate, but only when the political aspects profit those that have the greed. They interpret and understand the limited scope as it relates to a product or in fact this includes the pure lifestyle of their own management style. I can no longer accept this pure ignorance, but I have very little choice in how to deal with a majority feeling, with a minority understanding of themselves.
What should do you do with people that tell you what you want to hear and believe what they are telling you? But can’t react or even understand their reaction to their own words. This is a social manifestation that has developed and is fed by pure ignorance and is mandated by inferior motivation. It cannot continue and it cannot be stopped. This is the dilemma becomes unreal. Life and the cycle is on a roll and that roll appears to be heading inward with the intent that the society is going outward. It is complex. A simple society has made it easy for everyone to understand. It has made it easy to take a path of least resistance. It has made it easy to complain that things aren’t right. What is missing is the difficult part, making all these easy steps work by resolving and reducing frustration.
The question is why some actions are acceptable and looked upon as being right? At the same time, the same action can be looked at as being wrong and negative. This very concept is the heart of what society is living and adjusting to today, not tomorrow, today. It is my understanding that this condition is clear, but why then is it wrong? People agree that organizations strive for this perfect ideal condition, but in their makeup everything appears to be a critical identical consistent flaw that has been spread everywhere. It manifests itself throughout the environment by being inclusive and fears no group or leaves any person out.
Society works within this environment, so that today’s lives are not grossly affected. It appears like different types of concepts or rules dominate this action. The obvious solutions for someone that can understand this simple concept, give in, accept and forget. Live it and don’t let it bother you, but it is never clear at this time why, so accepting such a simple-minded approach toward problems became the issue.
The reason and motivation has to have vision and with it you are not allowed to bend or knuckle under. Acceptance across the board is wrong. Ironically but mostly forgotten, wrong is wrong, right is right.
Let’s go on a hypothetical case, first you identify areas that are considered wrong, as long as it doesn’t affect that person, your right. At a later time, another day, you confront that same person regarding the commitment that was given, it is totally ignored. This leads to a deep-rooted social impact, most problems appear to be self induced. It is clear that most of the time problems are generated for the requirements of society. It also seems that if everything was done to the book by definition, these people would be bored.
This would reduce their drive and the incentive to maintain by justifying their very existence. The manifestation of society to generate self existence by modes is real. It can be seen through the evaluation process generation after generations by creating a self need for survival. Making it hard to accept that everybody could or would do things according to somebody’s master plan.
Life has reason, but the question is how much of this reason is self generated by prophecy or believers of that same master plan. What will happen as time goes by and we the people are absorbed by the present and become a part of the past? It is difficult to clearly understand and try to explain why mankind goes through this form of self destruction.
Would man be more satisfied knowing that life could be easier? Everyone knowingly accepts the concept that it should be easier. The acceptance of life in its present form indicates that people are followers and few are true leaders. Those who are leaders fall into two categories. One that is politically motivated and the other is an outcast, because his concepts are perceived as being too strict.
This magnification creates a far reaching effect on the society of man. The structure of reason is important, and with it comes the need to survive and one sense of reality is that pure experience and knowledge are not the answers. What is considered as intuitive thinking, feeling, insight, is part of it. The problem of identification is not simple, but asks, is the crisis of mankind presently living with you? How can anyone accept themselves knowing that they wrong?
You have to believe and feel from within that you are right. Here comes the conflict, why does society have the problem of acceptance on being right? What would happen if they changed? There appears to be a fine line that is sometimes invisible between failure and success.
From a concept stand point, there is no failure or success. The definition is generated by a material demand, and based on exaggerated performances. Society accepts only what it feels it can successfully deal with. Considered yourself as one of those outcast leaders, would your strength appear by knowing what you are doing? At the same time would you be willing to stand up and fight for it?
Openly society does not posses total backing in that concept. At the same time you wouldn’t get criticized for it on the surface, but again we are on this fine line of our inept society, with its faults that demands an unrealistic approach toward saving or overlooking their own destiny.
Life in its present form of high tech has been developed by mostly low tech human welfare personality. Wanting a better life generates and motivates people for high tech or a form of materialistic high-tech convenience factors. Looking back before the technological revolution in my time, there was no difference on how to think or live in a modern society of its day. Some of the creature comforts of technology allow you to think deeper into man kind’s concepts, but for the most part these concepts are the same, because you are only allowed by divine right a certain amount of knowledge.
With the capacity to understand yourself, the question of degree is again in line with what people conceive or practice or are pushed within their limits. But more important than any question is to comprehend the meaning and significance of the true political crisis of social management in our modern technological environment.
In this article in the stories section, you seem to be trying to tell us that there is something wrong with management today. I agree, but I found that your explanation is very convoluted and difficult for anyone to understand. Every once in a while you make a cogent point, but then you wander off into wording that confounds.
'Better Without You'is a compelling narrative that explores the complexities of an affair, hidden secrets, and abuse. It also highlights a daughter's heartfelt journey as she cares for her mother who is battling dementia.
Deputy Dave Jenkins investigates the murder of local high school principal, Jerry Egge, but this is a multi-faceted novel that deals with spiritualism, romance, friendship, and children who fall through the cracks.
"Murder isn't usually this
The Disaster of Sharing Management © 2015 Joe Vojt
