Download from Smashwords (eBook)
Sam Smith books
Sam Smith books
Category:
Mainstream
Publisher: Smashwords
Type: Fiction
Pages: 300
Copyright: Jan 2 2018
ISBN-13: 9781005659868
Price: $2.99 (eBook)
This is what Liberty Rowley put up on Amazon after reading the short-lived Safkhet e-edition: "Wonderful book exploring the nature of writing, of love, of grief and also giving details on trees in the way that Moby Dick has chapters on different species of Whale."
We know from Trees' opening chapter that the narrator’s adopted daughter, Hazel, is going to die. But when? After the steroid treatments that make her into a slip-slopping bag of water? Or after discovering that her biological father is the millionaire Gustaf Eriksson, a man obsessed with the reforesting of England? Or will it be when her mother gives up her café and herself becomes involved with The Tree Prospectus?
Gustaf Eriksson made his reforesting fortune as a pop-music promoter, now in his tree-planting retirement he writes and occasionally performs haiku with one of his old bands. Or could this be a 17 syllable red herring?
Or will Hazel die after she leaves her sedentary game-playing boyfriend and moves in with her mother? Her mother who has also recently separated from her accountant husband. Who has even more recently got himself killed driving his car into a tree, a Scots Pine. The Scots Pine was innocent.
The trees, Alder through to Yew, will not be put on trial here. But we will meet the mother’s café staff and customers, as well as the woodland volunteer workers trying to save the planet along with Tree Prospectus’s two mainstay eco-hippies, Dez and Jay. While in the background is the threat of Gustaf Eriksson’s son, a reputedly violent homosexual. Will the two massive horses offer these tree people any protection? Or will the mother’s own sexual history, strange as it is, lead to a friendship that will in the end sustain The Tree Prospectus?
Excerpt
Chapter One
Her eyes were round and of such a dark brown that they seemed to have no definable centre. He hadn’t known where to focus. Not knowing exactly where to focus had made him feel shifty-eyed and so, by association, he had felt somehow guilty and feeling guilty he had wanted to make recompense, to please her.
But he couldn’t please her, had to force himself to say, “Six months. Yes.”
He said this sitting at his desk, black keyboard and lit screen before him.
The young woman, whose gaze he was doing his best to meet and to avoid was sitting on the edge of the chair to the side of his desk.
He looked away from the screen, braved her eyes again, and said to please her, “It’s only the roughest of estimates though.”
From her records he knew that he was only three years older than her.
“I wanted to know, safely,” she explained the purpose of her visit, “near enough how much longer I have.”
“Safely?”
“While I’m still me.”
“You mean physically well?”
The woman gave the slightest of nods and, as if instructing him, glanced towards the screen.
“Ah, yes.” He turned gratefully back to the screen. “I see what you mean. Yes, you should be you for another six months. Quite possibly a year.”
“That’s what she reckoned.” The eyes were again locked on his. “Nothing else there?”
On the screen was the latest letter from the hospital consultant. He slowly scrolled to its end, knew that the consultant would have sent the patient a lay version of the letter.
Before opening his door and calling her name down the corridor he had looked back through her medical records. She wasn’t registered as his patient. He was but one of several GPs in this practice, a large polyclinic in town, this suburban annexe a new-built one-storey block. Her GP was on long-term sick leave prior to retirement.
The consultant’s letter had been sent two weeks back. The patient had made this appointment only yesterday, had said that she didn’t mind which doctor she saw, whoever happened to be available. “In practice these days,” an older colleague had told him, “you’re deluded if you think the individual GP matters to the patient. To be seen straightaway and leave with a prescription is all that most patients want.”
Just once before he had seen this young woman - for a scald gone septic. She had left the routine timed session with a prescription for antibiotics and a salve. For this appointment, having been warned by the receptionist and having read the consultant’s letter, he had allowed more time.
He didn’t remember her eyes from the scald. Maybe last time he had the injury to examine, this time only her face to look at. Even so, apart from the eyes, hers was an unremarkable face. Possibly if she had been tall and slim the eyes would have made her round face conventionally beautiful. As it was she was short and she could, without insult, although she would not have welcomed the description, be described as, if not fat, stout. Indeed she herself, when dissatisfied with her changing room reflection, called herself ‘dumpy’, her legs ‘stumpy’.
He swivelled around from the screen.
“That’s all there is,” he said with an almost apologetic shrug.
She was quiet a moment, then, “Thank you,” she said.
If she had been going to weep now was the time. But there were no sign of tears: all that she had wanted from him had been last ditch confirmation.
Pulling her peppery-green jacket around her she started to stand.
“Anything we can do....” The doctor attempted a smile. “At any time. We’re only a phone call away.”
By this time she had reached the doorhandle, nodded to him - she was not a person given to easy expression - and she left the room.
The corridor wasn’t that long, was painted beige, the carpet a tough brown. In the waiting room, also beige, the carpet was a tough blue. Hard chairs lined three of the walls, a reception desk inset into the fourth. In the middle of the waiting room were two back-to-back short rows of chairs.
From this room all that was visible outside - through the high strip of window - was the top of a winter-battered palm between two cropped leylandi. Both of the leylandii, having once been allowed unrestricted growth, had been severely cut back to mostly dead underwood.
The young woman came to a stop before the plump knees of an older woman sitting alone in the middle row. Looking up the older woman said, “That it?” and she laid a magazine on the chair beside her. In the corner play area a toddler was talking to himself as he put plastic bricks into the back of a plastic lorry. A pale tired father looked on.
As she stood the older woman glanced over to the reception desk: “Another appointment?”
The young woman gave a sharp shake of the head, and waited while the older woman gathered up her coat and handbag. Both women called out ‘Goodbye’ to the receptionist as they left. The receptionist was on the phone, didn’t hear them.
Chapter Two
Cupresscyparis leylandii is a spontaneous hybrid of the Monterey and Nootka cypress, the most popular variety of which - in the UK - is Haggerston Grey, renowned for its vigorous growth. That vigorous growth, reaching 2 storeys high in as many years and thus becoming the frequent cause of neighbourly disputes - theft of sunlight principally - has seen the planting of leylandii forbidden in some house deeds and covenants and banned retrospectively by quite a few housing associations. If kept trimmed and topped, however, leylandii can make a near solid and most effective hedge. Too often, though, one forgetful year and it is let go.
My own dislike of leylandii is their stick-dry interiors, as dead and deserted as an unvisited mausoleum. Pulling aside their branches I get the feeling that, despite their waxy evergreen exteriors, and along with many other of the cypress family, they are dying from the inside out. These days of course leylandii hedges could indeed be dying, the dead parts being due to the leylandii aphid.
The palm, cordyline australis, is of New Zealand origin where it is known, because of its evergreen lanceolate foliage, as the Majestic Cabbage Tree.
The cordyline comes from the Latin Kordyle, club, that name coming from the shape of the palm’s root.
Sold by nurseries as frost-hardy, with claims that the palm can withstand temperatures as low as -8oc even in the soft winters of southern counties, the Majestic Cabbage Tree does still fall victim to heavy snow falls, the crown suffering damage. Not necessarily fatal: come spring the palm may well put out fresh shoots from base or trunk. ....If the Majestic Cabbage Tree is let live that long. Because, come spring, one does occasionally catch sight of a suburban front garden with a palm that has all the appearance of being wholly dead. From khaki bottom to top the bedraggled palm looks like nothing more than a thick-handled and very dead mop.
Those sheltered palms that do survive English winters with full foliage come summer can produce a spray of cream florets which fair burst from just below the crown, their fulsome scent as drenched sweet as a mouthful of Arab pastries.
Chapter Three
I’m writing all this down by way of an explanation. To explain to myself as much as to anyone else.
And I have a lot to explain, all muddled up inside my head and body, image atop memory with thoughts, suspicions, stomach lurches, trembling hands, sudden deep breaths, doubts recurring, frowned at and puzzled on. And I’m not sure what order all this should be in.
When I sat down to start this ordering I saw it taking the form of my explaining the ins and outs of the past few years as if to a close friend. A kitchen table tête-à-tête over a fine china tea set. Except that I don’t have a fine china tea set nor any friends that close. Certainly none that I’d go to the bother of explaining myself to.
The writing was easy enough to think of doing. The only way I could get started though was as if I saw myself as somebody else writing about two other people. Not that I’ve written that much, but already it seems that just that small amount needs me to explain it further.
Why, for instance, did I start with that particular visit to that particular Health Centre/Polyclinic/what you will? It certainly wasn’t Hazel’s first visit there. Nor was it by a long chalk the first waiting room I’d been left sitting in, flicking through magazines and avoiding eye contact.
So why did I start in that Health Centre?
Was it because Hazel had been pale that day, her face rigid, a determined look about her? Like when she was eight in that gym competition she had no chance of winning, knew she’d look a fool but had been determined to see it through.
Or is that one doctor visit at the forefront because in the beige ordinariness of that Health Centre the unwilling repetition of the prognosis put Hazel’s premature death beyond question?
Hazel’s first visits to the medical profession had begun anywhere between a year and eighteen months before. Those early appointments had been for flu-like symptoms that wouldn’t go away. Then came the persistent stomach cramps and debilitating headaches. Got so that Hazel felt that the doctors didn’t believe her and had her down as a hypochondriac.
Which was when she came to me: beyond miserable, wretched and with hardly the energy to be tearful. I knew my daughter. Her pain, her distress, did not have imaginary causes. One locum had even suggested that she ‘seek counselling’.
I went with her to her doctor’s, not mine. And this doctor, all-wise, all-knowing, had Hazel and I look angrily to one another.
Smiling sweetly at mother and daughter, this ‘family doctor’ had said that possibly, at Hazel’s age, these complaints might be something that I, her mother, had gone through.
“Hardly,” I told that smug female GP, “I’m her adopted mother.”
Which sounded odd every time I said it. As if baby Hazel had filled in all the forms, had been put through the interviews, that she had cleaned the house top to bottom before every remotely connected official had come to assess her eligibility to adopt Ian and I.
I probably overreacted that day in the surgery, maybe saw my chance, having wrong-footed the doctor, to strike home. I’m not, even when unprovoked, in the habit of suffering fools. And that doctor was the type anyway who got me on the aggressive-defensive. There she was all tall and blue-eyed, serene and unrummaged. While I know myself to be a flustered and red-cheeked frump. On our way in, looking for a parking space, Hazel had pointed out this doctor’s hardtop sports car. Mine was a second-hand hatchback.
I was more than pumped up for a fight. And my mother-hen hostility certainly had that over-tailored GP taking heed. Bloods were taken, even a DNA swab; and I delivered urine and stool samples to the surgery the following day.
A week or so later the test results led to Hazel being referred to a specialist. Which was when Hazel got told that she had a rare genetic condition. That specialist said that, so far as he had been able to find out, there was no known cure, as yet. Probably because it was such a rare condition.
He told Hazel that not every female child inherited the full condition from their mother. Not every mother with that DNA died from the condition, some were just carriers. Did Hazel have any sisters? A sister big-hearted enough to undergo surgery on her behalf? If so a bone marrow transplant might - such a treatment had worked with similar genetic conditions - might allow her to live to a ‘happy old age’.
I knew as part of the adoption process the name of Hazel’s birth-mother, but not whether Hazel had any birth-siblings. Ian and I had been told at the time of the adoption that Hazel had been an only child. What I didn’t know was if her birth-mother had subsequently produced any sisters.
Hazel hadn’t wanted me to go with her on that first visit to see the hospital specialist. At that time, despite my having accompanied her as rottweiler to her GP, Hazel had seen herself as an independent adult perfectly capable of dealing with grown-up affairs. And I had long got over the feeling of being shut out of her life, was happy to let her decide the ground rules for how often we met as adults. She called in on us pretty near every other Sunday, Christmases she always spent with us, summer holidays sometimes with Kevin's family, sometimes a package just the two of them. I had my own life, problems and plans of my own, wasn’t living through her.
Until this of course.
Hazel didn’t even come to me straight from the hospital, phoned me the evening of the following day, which must have been a Friday because it was the Saturday afternoon that she came over. I’d had to hurriedly get one of the girls to fill in for me at the café. Although Hazel hadn’t been alarmist - she had a distrust of melodrama - she had said that it was important, that she wanted to see both Ian and I together. Insisting on us being a pair, I had expected her to come with Kevin. Yet she arrived on her own.
Ian had been tetchily put out, having had to cancel a ride with a friend to be there. And then, as if contradicting his grumpiness, he wept when Hazel told us the prognosis.
“Oh Dad don’t,” Hazel said, and it was she who had to comfort him. Which had me clamping my mouth shut: my tearing into Ian then would not have helped Hazel.
Because by that time Ian and I were no longer living together. He had only been in the house on sufferance, at Hazel’s request (she had phoned him); and then he had been wondering beforehand if - Ian could only think within the parameters of convention, and despite knowing of her many visits of late to the doctor - if her ‘announcement’ was to have been news of pregnancy or ‘wedding bells’.
Paradoxically Hazel had that day seemed, she had certainly looked when she arrived, healthier than she had for months. Which in hindsight was probably down to her knowing that the illness wasn’t all in her imagination, that she definitely did have something wrong with her. Add to that the specialist having started her on painkillers appropriate to the pain and not just feeding herself paracetemol.
But it was through that first visit to her GP how I became involved in all that was to follow. Ian was obviously going to be of no help. And it was I who had to go searching through all the old paperwork and initialise the search for Hazel’s birth mother.
“Who quite likely,” the specialist said, “will have a one in four chance of having had this same condition and of not being any longer with us.”
Almost straightaway I discovered that Hazel’s birth-mother, Moira, was dead, had died years before when Hazel was 8. According to the Social Services preliminary reports Moira had fallen victim to an abusive relationship, not to an inherited condition. Actual cause of death was listed as accidental drugs overdose, a mix of morphine and amphetamines. Even so, the specialist later told Hazel and I, Moira could have been just a carrier.
It took a couple more weeks of phone calls and visits to Social Services plate glass offices before we could be sure that Hazel had no birth-sisters at all, let alone one compatible with her blood type and capable of donating bone marrow. I spent two more weeks, possibly longer - it’s hard to give up hope - looking to see if Hazel’s birth-mother had any sisters who might have had daughters still alive. I extended that search for birth-aunties. Found none.
At that time neither Hazel nor Ian shared my interest regards her birth-mother. I wondered then if Hazel’s birth-mother, Moira, had only gone so wild so young because her own mother had died from the condition during Moira’s early teens, and Moira had been left at home - I guessed - with a dodgy stepfather. According to Social Services’ records Moira had certainly left home at 15 to set up house with the first of her many boyfriends.
And there had been Ian and I, when offered baby Hazel for adoption, concerned over possible damage done to the foetus by the mother’s - then only suspected - history of addiction. Consequences of maternal drug abuse we had been prepared for, had read books on; and we spent years on the lookout for signs - failure to thrive, intellectual incapacity, compulsive behaviours...
A genetic time bomb hadn’t entered our considerations.
Meanwhile Hazel went for more examinations, agreed to student doctors studying her rare condition. I was present, hand-holding, a couple of times when doctors said, ‘the character of the illness’, as if ‘the condition’ was a person in its own right, as if my daughter had another person inhabiting her. She didn’t. Made her out to be next best thing to a schizophrenic. She wasn’t. She was a whole person, had her own history. The failing was mechanical, bits of her had gone wrong. Built-in obsolescence was kicking in early.
“The patient....” the hospital’s pinstriped consultant said.
“My daughter’s name is Hazel,” I said from my chair beside her bed.
“Hazel....” the pinstripe smarmed across Hazel’s smoothed covers at me.
Hazel wasn’t as prickly defensive as me, and for the sake of rare others agreed to submit herself to various tests and treatments. Some of those treatments were painful, none to any good effect. The researchers were happy, nay relieved - they couldn’t be held responsible - to admit to the limits of their knowledge. Hazel and I wished they knew more.
A medical science student researching his PhD and keen to relay his learning, told Hazel, “In times gone by the majority of working people died by the time they were 40. That is if they survived infancy. Mothers, young mothers, frequently died in childbirth. Female ancestors of yours who died in their early thirties would have been unremarkable. It is only now, with everyone living so much longer, that genetic conditions such as yours are being exposed.”
By which time I had, the permanent visitor, become an expert on hospital people - receptionists, nurses, doctors, porters and patients. And I knew that among all those hurrying by professionals the parent - mother or father - with the child held on their lap, or numb and small beside them - that parent saw the whole child, knew where that child had come from, had hopes for what that child might become.... Doctors looked for fresh symptoms, named ‘the condition’.
One of Hazel’s trial treatments had her throwing up, while a course of steroids made her so water retentive that she damn near sloshed as she walked. Waddled I should say. It all became so disfiguring and uncomfortable, and with no assurance that any of the treatments would cure her.
Which led Hazel to grab hold of the consultant’s more accessible registrar. She only ever saw the consultant on his weekly rounds, and then only if there had been a change in her treatment regime. Holding onto the registrar’s white sleeve she demanded to be taken off all medication.
“I don’t want to die in this state.”
The nervous registrar - I was scowling across the bed at him - although reluctant to lose the opportunity to test how Hazel’s condition would respond to other as yet untried treatments, did sympathise. As did the consultant when fetched along to the ward. Leastwise the consultant started talking about Hazel’s ‘quality of life’ as if it was his own bright idea. As another doctor, equally impotent, will later talk about giving my daughter ‘a good death’.
Theirs wasn’t a quick decision. A staff nurse was called over and the three talked for a good hour, considerations going round and about. Boiled down to the consultant having no option but to admit that what they had so far tried hadn’t had any beneficial effects. When Hazel couldn’t be persuaded to try any other treatments she was talked into taking medication to steady her occasional loss of balance, and was given a store of painkillers to keep by her. The pain at that time was mostly headaches.
The consultant wrote to Hazel’s tailored GP. That GP, if GPs do ever admit to being wrong (is that why so many doctors become politicians?) invited Hazel in to offer help howsoever she might need it.
That, however, was Hazel’s last visit to that doctor. Because shortly afterwards Hazel moved in with me and transferred back to our ‘family health practice’, but where the chances of seeing the same GP twice in a row is now about the same as anywhere else in England.
|
