|
|
|  | | Decoding the Language of God
book analyses the evidence uesd by scientist Francis Collins to support his Christian faith and concudes that scoence and religion cannot both be true and are incompatible worldviews.
The author refutes the arguments used by Francis Collins in his book "The Language of God" namely, that the Moral Law, the Big Bang and the unique value of the phyiscal constants require a divine explanation by providing natural explanations. The problem of a perfectly good and all powerful god and the existence of suffering and injustice in his creation is not satisfactorily addressed by Collins or other theists. The book reviews the history of the bible and points out that it fails to meet the criteria for reliable history and is in fact a legend developed | |  | | Decoding the Language of God
Refutes the evidence and arguments used by Francis Collins and others to reconcile Christianity with modern science and phlosophy. Gives metaphysical proofs of atheism.
Written for the general public the author provides scientific, natural explanations for the the "creation" of the universe, the existence of the moral instinct and characteristics of human nature that support the belief in a personal god. He accepts and defends the argument that this imperfect, unjust universe where innocent persons and animals suffer is proof that a good god interested in humans does not exist. Critically and objectively analyzing the Bible results in treating it as the legend of Jesus rather than a divinely inspired text. He urges a morality based on h | |  | | Decoding the Language of God
Critcially examines and refutes the argument that Christianity and modern science can be rationally reconciled as propsed by Francis Collins best seller "Language of God"
The author restates and refutes the arguments using creation by Big Bang, fine tuning of physical constants, evolution and the moral law to make belief in a Christian god consistent with logic reason and scientific facts. Debunks niave acceptance of the Bible as "word of god" He argues that the existence of undeserved suffering is proof of the fact that a god worthy of worship does not exist. |
|
|
|
