AuthorsDen.com   Join | Login    
Where Authors and Readers come together!

SIGNED BOOKS    AUTHORS    BOOKS    SAMPLE CHAPTERS    AUDIOBOOKS    eBOOKS    STORIES    ARTICLES    POETRY    BLOGS    NEWS    VIDEOS    SUCCESS    TESTIMONIALS

Featured Authors:  Antoinette Kopperfield, iRichard Cederberg, iR.E.E.S Blogs Linda Smith, Publisher, iDavid Young, iBryon Smith, iBetty Jo Tucker, iPatricia Sims, iTracey Morait, iSam Vaknin, iLinda Alexander, i

  Home > Political Science > Articles Popular: Books, Stories, Articles, Poetry      Authors: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z     

Rebecca S McKeehan

 Follow Me  

· Contact Me
· Sponsor Me!
· Books
· Articles
· Poetry
· Stories
· 1,064 Titles
· 2,921 Reviews
· Save to My Library
· Share with Friends!
·
Member Since: Dec, 2006

Rebecca S McKeehan, click here to update your pages on AuthorsDen!


Books by
Rebecca S McKeehan







See all Books
by Rebecca S McKeehan


Not the Voice of Democracy
by Rebecca S McKeehan   
Rated "PG" by the Author.
     
Last edited: Friday, August 2, 2024
Posted: Wednesday, July 31, 2024

Recent articles by
Rebecca S McKeehan

• Flowers
• State of Shame
• Love and the Three Musketeers
• Over A Precipice
• Judge Not
           >> View all

“Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people,
who have a right … and a desire to know.”
John Adams, 1765

As the election season heats up I look ahead at the possibility of a repeat of the 2016 election. I find myself worrying that a popular vote win for Kamala Harris would mean diddly squat when it came to the votes of members of the Colo-rectal College (aka Electoral College) and I decided it was time to refresh my education as to how, and why, that happens.

According to the National Archives website (archives.gov/electoral-college/about), the Founding Fathers created the Electoral College “as a compromise between the election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens.” Each state has one elector for each member in the House plus two senators. The District of Columbia is allocated three electors and is included when the term “State” is used as a whole.

Presidential candidates have their own “slates,” or group of electors, who are chosen by the candidate's political party. However the Constitution does not provide many guidelines as to how those electors are selected or what their responsibilities are. According to the National Archives:

“The U.S. Constitution contains very few provisions relating to the qualifications of electors. Article II, section 1, clause 2 provides that no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector. As a historical matter, the 14th Amendment provides that State officials who have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States or given aid and comfort to its enemies are disqualified from serving as electors.”

Which leads me to wonder how someone who has committed such offenses can still run for President.

But I digress...

Other details regarding choosing electors are left up to the individual states, most of which have a “winner-take-all” system that awards all electors to the Presidential candidate who wins the popular vote. In other words, if your vote is not part of the state majority then your vote is null in the national.

More than 700 proposals have been introduced in Congress to reform and even eliminate the Electoral College. More so than on any other issue. The American Bar Association holds that the system is “archaic” but many political scientists support its continuation. Perhaps this is because it would allow more opportunity for a third party to make a significant showing, and wouldn't that be the proverbial monkey wrench in the works? But isn't that like denying rights to vote for whom you choose?

The Colo-rectal College, excuse me, the Electoral College, is not a system that benefits America. It allows too much power to those with agendas not shared with large populations of political constituents and opens the door to shady “good ole boy” type dealings. We saw that most recently in 2016 when Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by a substantial margin but ultimately lost the election to Donald Trump who had held more sway over the electors who were supposed to vote the way the majority of the voters want. Obviously, that wasn't the case. Somehow, someway, the Colo-rectal College came up with more supposedly representative “popular” votes than the actual popular vote would indicate. There is definitely something rotten in the system that would allow that to happen.

The United States was founded on the notion of equal rights. Our Constitution guarantees those rights and over the years amendments have been made that are supposed to define and enforce those rights. The Electoral College does not reflect the ideology of equality. What was created with good and honorable intention has been warped and distorted until it now gives preferential power to those who know how to manipulate the law. It's time for the voting public to stand up for their voice to be heard en mass, not in part. It's time to reinstate Democracy for all Americans regardless of party affiliation. It's time to vanquish the Electoral College.

c. 2024
   


Want to review or comment on this article?


Need a FREE Reader Membership?
Reviewed by Kalikiano Kalei
Reviewed on August 30, 2024
I can't help, Rebecca, speaking as a medical person, if there is a cure for Electoral Dysfunction (ED?). It was certainly never to be found in my medical texts, very true also for those strange fish called 'Colo-rectal Sturgeons' (I'm not a fisherperson, so pardon any loose liberties I may be taking here in taxonomic nomenclature!). Fortunately, as we say in the Gastroenterology profession, "It usually all works out in the end (LoL)." Not so, I fear, for our vacuumous friend, Kamalalala-I-can't-hear-you H. Her (political) end...hopefully...will be messy, when the voters realise that she can't even evacuate her own vowels properly...

OK, I'm going to stop here with the digestive verbiage, but I agree with your sediments completely! ;))

Reviewed by Ronald Hull
Reviewed on August 1, 2024
I love the way you word worked electoral college. It sure is constipated, constitutionally.

You may recall that Jimmy Carter lost his majority vote to Ronald Reagan in 1980 because of the electoral college, and more recently, Al Gore lost to George W. Bush. Leading us to war, destabilizing the world more, instead of spending that money on turning around global warming clearly indicated by scientific fact, but poorly presented by Gore.

Since the 1960s civil rights and other reforms brought by the Democrats, Republican planned their course ahead, primarily by gerrymandering congressional districts, enabling them to have the upper hand when it came to the so-called, college without qualifications.

When I came to my Southwest Houston home in 1981, my district representative was failed exterminator Republican, Tom Daly, the party guy of the Congress who eventually became the gerrymandering guy because he wanted NASA in his district while he still lived in Sugar Land, many miles away. I ended up in a democratic, predominantly black, district stretching all the way to the east side of downtown over 20 miles away. While Tom dropped in my mailbox all his hand-gladding and dealmaking newsletter, not his legislation.

Al Green, my Democratic representative since, was the first to file a resolution to Impeach Trump and also has made a strong effort in trying to eliminate the electoral college. His emails to me do not ask for money but inform me of the bills that he is writing and championing for the people. Why, in most elections, he stays unopposed for doing what a representative should do. Tom Daly was convicted of fraud, I believe. Then later, it was overturned by Republican influencers… Judges.

The Senate is also archaic. For some reason, although they opposed British rule, they modeled our Congress like the British Parliament with the House of Lords and House of Commons. We should have no lords in this country. And recently, senatorial stonewalling behavior seems to bear out why.

And then there is the Supreme Court, appointed for life…Like kings.

Ron




Reviewed by E Phillips
Reviewed on August 1, 2024
Great article. You nailed the evil with one word: colo-rectal. A couple of years ago I calculated that it gave the Repooplicans a 27 vote advantage before the polls open--the same SOBs who cry "foul" even when they lose the popular vote by 8 million.

Popular Political Science Articles
  1.  02 Substack Interviewed on Political P
  2.  Astrological Commentary On The 2016 El
  3.  We the Pimples... (or) a Child's Garde
  4.  Election Time USA and the Theatre of t
  5.  Fatuous Beyond Absurdity
  6.  A Thought Experiment About The Virus
  7.  Globalization
  8.  South Carolina’s Medicaid Travesty
  9.  Puppetmaster
  10.  Winners and Losers
  11.  U.S. Reliance on China’s Green Energy:
  12.  Danuta!
  13.  Whatever Happened to Journalistic Stan
  14.  A Scrappy Lot
  15.  A Special Invitation from Donald Trump
  16.  A Modest Proposal: Sharing Social Secu
  17.  When Trump Leaves
  18.  Exposing My Naivete
  19.  Fascism Loosely Defined for Current El
  20.  An Interesting experience AtThe Voting
  21.  No Kings Day
  22.  Fascism In A Nutshell
  23.  Cheney Has Failed Miserably
  24.  To Be A Patriot
  25.  When Trump Shakes Down the Media

Free Book Review Program
Select a book to read and review today!

Free Download - Putin's Russia by Sam Vaknin

Russia's economy and politics under Vladimir Putin.  
Member BookAds

Cedric the Rednek Rights Pomes v2 by RickthePoetWarrior

#Rightwing Culture expresses itself and in turn is expressed in a turnabout is fair play kind of way.  
Member BookAds

Tyrann(y)asaurus (w)Rex v4 by RickthePoetWarrior

That I hope soon to be extinct dinosaur, our government, is bludgeoned and beaten as thoroughly as the freedom of the law lets me without jail time.  
Member BookAds