The Paucity Paradigm
By
Bill Cottringer
“Usually the first problems you solve with the new paradigm are the ones that were unsolvable with the old paradigm.” ~Joel A. Barker.
Way back in the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve did something that contaminated our thinking and the language we invented to express it, in effect, reducing abundance potential in half. I call this the paucity paradigm. It is a way of looking at life and such a powerful paradigm creates artificial enemies and conflicts between us vs. life, us vs. others and even us vs. ourselves. Taking that treacherous bite of the apple from the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil, divided the whole universe in half, resulting in an infinite series of what Alan Watts called dualistic opposites. This list is solidified with seemingly opposite-sounding words like male vs. female, good vs. bad, right vs. wrong, up vs. down, slow vs. fast, rich vs. poor, inside vs. outside, intelligent vs. ignorant, union vs. separation, surviving vs. thriving. desirable vs. undesirable, spirit world vs. material world, and so on. Even the words themselves imply dualism.
Now the trouble with adopting this paucity paradigm and failing to question its validity, is the usual outcome of putting all your eggs into one basket and then falling and breaking them all at once, just like Adam and Even did, metaphorically or maybe even physically. Now we have broken shells, scrambled eggs and even wars over the artificially created dualistic this and that things, made real by further either-or categorical judgments and comparative words . The division is verified every day when day turns into night and then back into day again, when we finish work with time left over to play and then sleep and wake up again just to start all over again, and when we look in the mirror and see our separate ourselves from everything else including the mirror.
Here is a much simplified way how things generally work: We select a particular viewpoint to look at things (usually where we are at the time, for convenience). This perspective or beginning paradigm in turn produces a particular perception which results in thinking, beliefs, emotions and choices, and of course the outcomes we end with from all these interactions. A very good question to ask—and creative people are better at asking the good questions rather than finding the clever answers—is the following one. Am I at the best viewpoint to see the whole truth of the big picture or am I just seeing a half-truth of a smaller picture and being deceived into thinking it is a whole one for sure? As Stephen Covey warned earlier, getting to the top rung of the ladder you are climbing is not a very propitious time to notice you have placed your ladder against the wrong building.
So, if you haven’t gotten to the top rung of your ladder quite yet, it may be a good time to question the perspective you currently have which is driving all your perceptions, thinking, feeling, beliefs and choices. After all, if you don’t like what you currently see, then just consider moving viewpoints in place or time. That is even easier done than said! Is it a paucity paradigm cheating you from the rest of life or are you wisely situated in the middle ground where you can see in all directions and not miss half of the view? Can we return the universe to wholeness by putting all the halves we have disassembled, back together again? Isn’t that a noble idea worth considering? All it would take is following the profound advice in the book “The Shack.” That is to see the damage we do with our quick judgments of all the this vs. that pronouncements we make, resulting in winners and losers, and sometimes losers and more losers, and start forgiving all the wrong judgments of which we have all been guilty of engaging. If this wholeness is the end-game reality of life, then why are we hesitating and delaying doing what we can choose with our free will—the abundance paradigm? Or is this just another half- truth paradigm shift in the universe’s ever-evolving creative process? That is probably the question of our generation.
I think what we are up against here is the obvious imbalance between the many of us who are too busy trying to just survive life breathing, and the lucky few who manage to thrive and fly into the sky. How do the success shadow-makers do it? They have a secret and it has a lot to do with their paradigm from which they communicate it and make their choices. They simply spend a little more time being accepting, tentative, free, sensitive, spontaneous and equal and conveying those qualities to others, in enabling people rather than disabling them. This way of being and communicating avoids the opposite qualities that Jack Gibbs earlier identified as causing a lose-lose defensive climate of communication—judgement, certainty control, neutrality, strategy and superiority. This is also what the John Nash character in the movie “A Beautiful Mind” was trying to contribute to economic game theory with a possible win-win outcome from cooperation instead of the traditional zero-sum game played in competition.
It may turn out that escaping dualism is not possible, maybe because similarly, justice is just a way to repair injustice so to speak. But at least doing what we now know leads to thriving, is probably a sensible way to help more people get there in abandoning their ineffective paucity paradigms they inherited from Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.
“If you want small changes in your life, work on your attitude. But if you want big and primary changes, work on your paradigm.” ~Stephen Covey.
William Cottringer, Ph.D. is Executive Vice-President for Employee Relations for Puget Sound Security Patrol, Inc. in Bellevue, WA, Adjunct Professor at Northwest University, and former President of the Washington State Security Council. He is author of several business and self-development books, including, “You Can Have Your Cheese & Eat It Too” (Executive Excellence), “The Bow-Wow Secrets” (Wisdom Tree), “Do What Matters Most” and “P” Point Management” (Atlantic Book Publishers), “Reality Repair” (Global Vision Press), and “Reality Repair Rx” (Authorsden). He can be reached for comment at 425-454-5011 or ckuretdoc.comcast.net
Ron—You ask one of the most important questions that can be asked and one in which I have been trying to understand the great majority of my life as a child, student, parent, employee, friend, teacher, manager and psychologist. To be quite honest, I think I am just now beginning to wrap my short arms around this enormous question. Here are the important elements of my understanding of a reasonable answer:
• We genetically inherit a body of unconscious wisdom from our parents and ancestors. This body of wisdom comes with all the potential fundamental paradigms, or perspectives, that eventually lead to basic beliefs about reality which we seek out experiences to prove or disprove.
• To truly understand human behavior we have to be open to understand reality as it is and not how we think it is from our limited conscious thinking.
• Such openness towards the mystery of life helps us to have the courage to begin to question all that we think we know for sure—all the starting assumptions, paradigms, perceptions and beliefs that hold us together. This is a very painful and difficult process, because it is like throwing our own security blanket in the ocean or having the rug pulled from under us.
• This process is even more problematic because the great majority of wisdom we were born with and acquire along the way and then try to consciously “test” for truth, is packed away deep inside our unconscious minds and protected by strong emotions. It is virtually inaccessible other than by extreme critical thinking, intuition or meditation.
• I believe the creative process driving the whole universe is evolving towards balance—from experiencing one of the polar opposite extremes, to the other, and eventually towards the middle.
• Understanding the necessity of all the pairs of opposites we experience, like life and death, good and evil, pain and pleasure, success and failure and so on, is the beginning of reconciliation of what ends up to be understood as two different sides to the same coin.
• The whole human journey is movement towards the wholeness and unity we came from.
So, the short answer to this question is that you and your sister have two different fundamental paradigms in which you are viewing life differently, i.e. as just one example, everything happening randomly vs. designed as purposeful destiny by a higher power or to be “obeyed” by free will. Your lives are spent seeking and having experiences that support and affirm your chosen either-or paradigm. But what you don’t know is that you are both shifting paradigms, just as the East is becoming more materialistic and the West is becoming more spiritual, or men gaining more famine traits and women masculine ones.
The real short answer to the question is, “because you can” and that is an opportunity of a life time as a very precious gift you have given to yourself or have been given by another, as it really doesn’t matter.