Now that the celebration if over, now that things can return back to normal, this will be the perfect time to asked some questions about what in the hell just happened here? Well I don't know about most of you, but as for me there are still quite a few unanswered questions surrounding this whole Boston marathon bombing incident.

No one as of right now can provide a perfect reason to explain the two young men's motives behind the bombings, as I see it, they appeared to be very young and very Americanized, meaning they appear to be enjoying living out the American dream. They did not fit the radical Islamic picture the media always seem to paint when we envision terrorist. I am not saying that a terrorist is suppose to look a certain way, instead what I'm implying is the fact that mainstream media plays a significant role when it comes to shaping our minds in what they want us to see and believe.  Is that an unfair assessment to make about our media? you may ask, and my response would be yes if the media wasn't 100% owned and controlled by just a handful of Corporate interest. http://money.cnn.com/2003/06/02/news/companies/fcc_rules/

Due to the fact that corporate interest which represent 1% of the population yet owns 90% of our nation's news stations,  it's hard for me to completely buy into to what they ( The Media) are trying to feed me. Please allow me to make myself clear, this is in no way an attempt to disrespect or belittle our fellow American citizens that lost their lives and who were seriously injured in the bombing, because I am keeping you in my prayers. I just can't help but to wonder if the victims of this horrible bombing were actually victims of  a much larger scheme? Something much larger than the two alleged assailants. As I stated earlier, we still don't have a clear picture behind what transpired these young men's actions to go out and harm innocent people, from what was initially reported by the media it was stated that the FBI had  nothing to go on and be convinced to single out a guilty party. Especially when you take into consideration the fact that from the very beginning the FBI stated they had nothing to go on because there were no warning signs from the outset. Meaning there were no letters, no suspicious behavior, no suspicious individuals that stood out from the crowd, this was reported in the news just hours after the bombing. http://gerarddirect.com/2013/04/16/terrorist-bombs-attack-the-boston-marathon-is-this-the-future-of-america/

What we do know is this, America is still in a recession, the wars are continuing 10 years later because these Middle-Eastern countries turned out to be more than what we had bargained for and as a result, it is drying up what's left of our economic resources. The government can no longer afford to employ it's workers, not as long as they are unionized this is why the public sector is now being replaced by the private sector or corporate interest.  Public schools are being wiped out to be replaced by charter schools and unions are under attack nationwide. Fire Fighters along with police officers are being laid off all over the nation, not to mention state and federal employees. Face it, your government can no longer carry you because the money is running out, and to add more money into the economy with another stimulus package will only weaken the already weakened dollar.

The beauty of nature is it's will to survive, for example if a herd is slowed down and left vulnerable to predators due to a weak member then the herd will protect itself by leaving the weak behind as an offer to the predator in exchange for their survival. No different than a rat that will cut off it's own foot in order to save itself, well the same laws of nature when it comes to survival will apply to our government that will  eventually have no choice but to shut down it's money supply to save itself from total loss.

Once this happens it wouldn't be hard for you to imagine the reaction of the people, and if you can imagine it,  then you don't think our government can imagine it as well? So to protect herself from a major catastrophe that will be caused by her own citizens she ( the government) had to put safety procedures in place to suppress any sign of a resistance by the people. Now the question you may be asking yourself is why would this be necessary? Our country should be economically sound considering that we are the richest nation in the world, but are we? Since the 1970's  due to the gas embargoes by Arab Nations under the Nixon, Ford and Carter Administrations, America was moving it's companies out of the country, that is why major steel mills and auto plants in places like Detroit,  Michigan, Youngstown, Ohio and Gary, Indiana to name a few were drying up.  http://www.wisegeek.com/how-does-outsourcing-affect-the-us-economy.htm By the time Reagan stepped into office he saw the writing on the wall, he knew the only direction in which this country was headed was on a downward spiral. It was under Reagan's term where they drafted Rex-84 that got exposed during the Oliver North Iran-Contra trial, due to at that time independent press and intense questioning by Congress, Rex-84 was leaked out to the public and instantly shutdown, at least so we thought.

By the time Clinton stepped into office, our country was drowning in debt, this was no secret and it wasn't debt that was caused by neither Reagan nor Bush for they too inherit the Nation's debt that spiraled out control since the late 60's into the early 70's. Though Clinton received a great deal of credit for restoring our nation's debt, but what he don't receive a great deal of credit for is the causing the economic bust in 2007 housing market. Under the Clinton Administration Wall-Street was running one of the largest scams the world had ever seen, it was called Derivatives and it was going on unrestricted right under Clinton's nose and even though he was informed, President Clinton elected not to do anything to stop it, but don't take my word for it, read the transcripts yourself http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/warning/etc/script.html

So by the time Bush Jr. stepped into office our nation was under water with debt, and due to the fact that the derivative scandal was done without the public's knowledge serious paperwork or paper trails needed to be destroyed. Events transpired under Bush's term in which we all know too well (911) but not only did 911 inspire the ongoing wars that are currently draining our resources, but 911 also gave birth to the Patriot's Act, the first assault inflicted on our Civil Liberties. Obama made plenty of empty promises on his trail for President, but reversing the Patriot's Act wasn't one of them not that would have matter anyway because as I stated, he made plenty of empty promises from the start. Instead what Obama decided to do was sign the National Defense Authorization Act in early 2012 behind the back of the American people. But in any military operation, it needs to be tested in order to get an idea of how knowing effective it can be in a real life situation. In other words, what will be the people response after realizing their civil liberties are being violated? Keep in mind people, it was not just the Boston police that were involved in the shut down, you also had the military out there as well. It was the media coverage that made me suspicious of the lock down, for they were all on the same page on not asking questions to explain the necessity to conduct such a massive shut down for one individual that ended up causing the city to lose millions of dollars during a recession.