just spoofin'.
just goofin'
on poets who
must critisize,
philosophize,
oversize
their reviews.
have ya' paid
your dues?
can ya' fill
your shoes?
rate me a 10.
give me a one.
but when all's said
and done,
i had the fun.
i wrote the write.
and you just might
get a little insight.
that is,
if ya' don't keep missin'
the point.
gettin' outta' joint
over a line or 2.
and if ya do,
oh well,
screw you.
Hi Steve
Really cute, and point well taken. When I am long winded on a review it is strictly an opportunity for duscussion. In my perspective literary works of any kind need only be RATED on technical merit--a reader's personal impression of whether the content is good or bad has nothing to do with the quality of the artist's talent. Thus here
I will rate everything a 10, in order to be able to post the review--and place technical observations when it seems they will be received in the spirit of support that is intended. (My long-windedness just might inspire a . . . "part II," huh? Vicky
A unique perspective about the reality of existence, the meaning of life, the true impact of relationships between human beings and all life as well as the spirit world, and the impact that everyone makes on the universe. (Available in Print or as an
Explains the realizations that have given the author the views of living life fully. The life each person dreams about.
You must take a look at yourself before dreams can be reached.
Deciding what is the core of belief.
Share
Print
Save
Follow
Really cute, and point well taken. When I am long winded on a review it is strictly an opportunity for duscussion. In my perspective literary works of any kind need only be RATED on technical merit--a reader's personal impression of whether the content is good or bad has nothing to do with the quality of the artist's talent. Thus here
I will rate everything a 10, in order to be able to post the review--and place technical observations when it seems they will be received in the spirit of support that is intended. (My long-windedness just might inspire a . . . "part II," huh? Vicky
Not Jack