Of course, the free verse crowd will decry this as old-fashioned archaic language, with no place amongst their modern offerings of plasticised sophistries, whereby love’s ritual, is no longer to be expressed as a real emotional experience.
Where too often, their gaudy offerings are seen presented as some anfractuous item packaged in polyethylene in some internet storage facility of words, or as glaze eye catechumen on a wordmongers stall arranged for effect. Such is the wonders of modern poetry.
Whereby, free verse’s illogical language is now classed as an art form, at least by the uneducated. Students go to colleges to be educated, there nothing in the end product to substantiate that assumption if free verse is a consideration worth noting.
However, the said free verse may no longer qualify as being modern, it is now well into antique time and therefore approaching archaic status. To be viewed possibly, as word’s stumpiness of poetic curiosity, beloved by short-legged grammarians and punch-drunk comma chasers, living on a diet of definite articles.
True shares o’ love by nature are,
it surely, sweetest o’ man’s pleasure.
For there be seen due credit far,
if not, its acme o’ his treasure.
For ne’er be him aye counting cost
or accumulation o’ his baubles.
If he should see, dilection lost,
what griever then, peer they his troubles?
For cozen man cause grieving heart,
he be as raking o’ life’s sorrows.
What premium self would reason part,
if love’s own heed it no tomorrows.
What man should fear, or dare to try,
Au courant; Self-passion all embracing
if from his care, he gave a sigh,
for one, to wish he such a sharing.
Does not, desire, in time outsmart
concealment o’ that lonesome thought.
Of all those pains itself impart,
if love’s own hand, it ne’er has sought.
For friendship, be itself so blest,
centricity; such said, largess o’ man.
Deny me ne’er that lone request,
to see how, a priori time began.
Or ever so, to seek from me,
that pricelessness o’ bliss destroy.
When wasted words deem to decree,
denial; Its own such thought deploy.
Mor.
Seeing how rarely I post on Authorsden, unlike some that needs to be the centre of attention every couple of days.
I would therefore conclude it is of little importance to any one.
Vanity sites being what they are, you appear to have made yourself well at home.
I write for a select few, it matters little what others like you think; your opinion unfortunately is of no importance.
However, you do appear to show an interest, which I suppose is no bad thing.
lover of language. Few of us mere scribblers of words can rise
to the eloquence that you command, nor will we ever know the joy
of creating tapestries of words fit only for the angels. In all due
humbleness, I salute you.
gaudy offerings,
short-legged grammarians,
punch-drunk comma chasers,
I shared these 'descriptive phrases' with the group of writers that I meet with occasionally. The majority thought that you are sharing your work in the wrong venues. One of them said: 'No writer should have to demean the lesser talents to substantiate their own work.' You are an advanced writer, Mor, in your chosen field of expression. A great majority of the people who share on internet sites are fledglings looking for some kind of understanding, or accreditation, that they don't get in their daily walk. It can be a numbing experience. You've conjured a marvelous poem composed thoughtfully and threaded together with colorful phraseology. Continued inspiration...
I agree with you about the snobby free verse crowd and the crowd that abandons capitol letters and punctuation as some kind of avant-garde (lazy?) form of expression. Isn't e.e. cummings passé by now?
In spite of my hearing problem either helping or refusing to listen to some of the nasty words, isn't the rage about rapping in its rhyming? I think so. Country songs, the most popular form of music today, generally rhyme.
Ron
Michael D.