Still, casting Kirsten Dunst (“The Cat’s Meow”) in the lead role here made sense. She’s especially convincing when projecting the bewilderment of a young girl suddenly placed in a position of such high visibility. And she looks absolutely stunning in those elaborate period costumes designed by Milena Canonero (“Barry Lyndon”).

Dunst portrays an Austrian princess who, in her early teens, is forced into an arranged marriage to the Dauphin (Jason Schwartzman), a teenager destined to become King Louis XVI. Sadly -– although not unusual in the 17th century -- these youngsters are merely pawns to bring about closer ties between their two countries. Marie moves to France where she must give up all her personal possessions (even her cute little dog), and finds herself right in the middle of the decadent goings-on at Versailles. Despite her gorgeous new clothes and luxurious surroundings, she can’t help being confused and frightened. And, who wouldn’t be? All around her are individuals she can’t trust -- sycophants, gossips, obnoxious in-laws and many other people who don’t like her.

Louis shows little interest in Marie (the marriage goes on for years -– as does this movie, it seems -- before being consummated), so she takes a lover (Jamie Dornan), which gives the gossip-mongers even more fodder. She soon becomes the talk of France because of her indiscretions and extravagant expenditures. As we all know, when the Revolution comes, Marie feels the wrath of her starving subjects. Did she ever say “Let them eat cake?” Not really, but Coppola (“Lost in Translation”) serves up delicious pastry treats in ornate displays throughout most of the film.

Instead of a stodgy historical epic, Coppola set out to create a more modern and upbeat movie –- even to the point of adding contemporary background music by such artists as The Cure and Bow Wow Wow, whose haunting rendition of “Fools Rush In” turned out to be the best thing about “Marie Antoinette” for me.

“I wanted this film to let the audience feel what it might be like to be in Versailles during that time and to really get lost in that world,” Coppola says. Based on “Marie Antoinette: The Journey,” Antonia Fraser’s acclaimed biography, the movie treats Marie “like the new kid at school –- but in a very alien environment.”

Coppola describes her vision of Marie as “mostly a good-hearted, creative person who was unaware of the world outside of Versailles.” Unfortunately, her film comes across as a series of vignettes instead of a cohesive story. Adding to my disappointment, the fuzzy cinematography and continuous indecipherable whispering of its characters made “Marie Antoinette” the most annoying film I’ve seen since “Miami Vice.”

Despite its opulent settings and Dunst’s fine performance, “Marie Antoinette” didn’t work for me. Lacking a serious tone more appropriate for its historical subject matter, the film left me with an empty feeling -– and yet, surprisingly, with little desire to learn anything more about the life and times of Marie Antoinette.

(Released by Columbia Pictures and rated “PG-13” for sexual content, partial nudity and innuendo.)

Review originally posted on the ReelTalk Movie Reviews website.