I started..... For dis course I has no words.....and....

An Invitation at the rationing had broken my aim to speak this fort night

Rationing in respect for economy, efficiency and a simple matter of effort for my incentives and wishfullness in this respect. I have come prepared with a new and irrefutable analogy I called and named a theory, as this is my discussion- theory. Theory is different from analogy, as black is different from dark-white different from causasian- bright reflection different from a street lamp. The Aurie Borialis not different from light or reflection, but in so remote a place, is lesser in conparison to a street lamp, that discussion of its' intelligence cannot be derived from the brightness of a street lamp or established as applicable. A stupid light from outerspace, and to share a complete brightness with you, guides your intellect. If one seeks bright company, and if he is not rich to construct a spaceship to test and feel the Auria Borialis, he'd remain only a little lesser alone to own a street lamp as a practical utility.
As theory is of analogy, analogy not of theory, but a building block of of the abstract. A filament of a light bulb, a building block of its' illuminations, I can compare, without regards to the practicalities of material objectness, mental objectiveness, simple facts of life and living uncommon to those who are simple, more than common to those whose paths illuminate more than their own progressions , and unknown to those established in dependancy on those alien lights reflected freely from the external. This is not theoretical, it is analogical to the bright, and theoretical to the dull.
Of a very fine distinction in this regards are surfaces. A theoretical surface is of mathematical components, and an analogous surface is a material obnject that looks like some other material object. And, thus, approaching my discussion from these two directions, there is an arising dilema: is my theory solid or is any theoretical solid object anaologus to it. And thus my thoughts lead to a new realm in cognition and assembly of the idea:
Does it have tangibility?

Does what? My theory, A solid object, an abstraction.
What is the product of tangibility. An army has mobility, a man tranquility. The making of a movie, feasibility. It has .....according to most, either the property material or immaterial. Of no importance- the food of an adventurer is important to him, that of a gormet cook -not with respect to its volume or amount.

Thus again all interpetation is relative to the perspective of one, one named witness, in that, I am third witness in this description, all is abstraction as sure as the other witnessess are self conceived as tangible entities.


With this distinction, considered as an abstraction, I will continue into a new notion with discusion and an intended reform in theory to the consequences of language, to define from a new perspective- the alternate medium of color:seek to compare color with the mathematical, the philosophical,and to ultimately say that we can say more with color, (with color pictures than with black and white pictures) than of the blander and lesser diverse properties afforded the modulation of the winds of speach..
medium color is as I sais is as self speaking and predictive of not only itself in theoretical requirment, as much as either a subtle or medium heat can cause light, verses heavy, frequency changes from heated colors depending or not depending on if heat has alternate routes to state itself, either honestly or dishonestly, in temporate or non temporate climates in a manner that is independant of color, as color might accomplish with regards to heat. A well positioned medium postion in the absense of intensity, hue, saturation cannot assume your profits and losses, or shift between interpretations of proximity from red shift in distant heats seen in the red and black( as black has no definition with respect to color-it is its' absense:and if we are communicating without words and colors, and we are seeking only words or colors,to include black or heat as a potential subset of the red, shift the absent dark or complete light, we would have described the immaculately conceived as ordinary in assuming its use in ordinary communications-thus we must seek to avoid the unended, as it is always beyond ordinary perception wherein all and any colors, of which exists an enormous variety with a limit to the infinite and the immaculate black as origin-and end-beyond, what ever is not included: avoiding in definition roots and branches -direction :as who knows real forwards, from real reverse, but can recall the colored features of events from their histories. ... and with white as an entire domain.
This is a much neater package than an open set of combinations of shaped symbols, what is not known,cannot be known, can and does never (or need) arise to question. To be continued....(but do not hold your breath ..breathe and perceive....if there is something to say remember that you are not a flashlight so save your batteries and energy-unless it is vital.