An elapsed eclipse
has dwelled
amidst a red glowed tune I mixed up with the moon and not the sun
as correctly as a mistake is seen the same
wrong twice
but correctly expressing my dissention with the right.
.....answer
and ...
....a speaking answer answered.....
"I was right and a professing professor
answered the answer thinkling
that I was wrong.
in the exact same sense
but not historical context
when I was asleep in the hay"
And I replied
"exactly what do you mean "
"in the in-between is
neither a void nor a parnoid notion
of even an ocean
that can be asociated
and projected as a space
where
the sun or moon might lay
as i did in a field of dismayies
when I thought this through
obviously at night
the same as you are speaking to me alone at day
some answer to your question that had been sleeping elsewhere
full of light
though
it had been at night
in order
for order
to concur with my answer
which has
no preliminary assumptions in the posing or reposing
I 'ad been habituated to
As english has no corresponding word for siesta
and no word to say whether my labors weren't labors
just to think of an answer so far in the astray
where in resides no bank
no cash in my pay
on payday
And where were you at that time of day?
......At a reflecting
corresponding
bank?"
So neither of us can be right nor wrong
Just a matter of money and a song about money
Should anyone ask a bank
And depending on whether they are all at lunch or on break
Or at home in the hay.
In my opinion
If that's what you respectfully speak:
As an opinion cannot relate to a bank
No more than a tomatoe talk to a patch
No less than a tomatoe talk with a patch
but
Only with a patch of hay.
Marvin E. Kirsh