Since you have made me enter
This theme, my dear opponent,
I'll try to explain you the state of things
In a quite rough way.
Do you in the same way listen to me?
If you have got the better of me
And not I of you, are you right
And I am wrong to be?
If I have got the better of you
And not you of me, am I right
And you are wrong to be?
Is the one of us completely right
And the other is wrong? Are we both
Right or we both are wrong?
Since we cannot come to a mutual
And common understanding,
We will certainly continue in the dark
On this quite a simple question.
Whom shall I employ to judge
In this quite a primitive case?
If I employ one who agrees with
Your esteemed side, how can he
Or she, agreeing with you,
Do so correctly for both of us?
If I employ one who agrees with
My humble side, how can he or she,
Agreeing only with me, do so
In a pretty objective manner for us both?
If I employ one who disagrees
With you and me, how can he or she,
Disagreeing with both of us, do so
In a correct way for both sides?
If I employ one who agrees with you
And me, how can he or she, agreeing
With us both, do so correctly, you see?
This way, you and me and all those others
Would not be able to come to a mutual
And common understanding; and shall we
Then wait for such a wise judge? I think
We need not do so. Don't you agree with me?
So, to wait on others means to learn
How the conflicting opinions are changed
Without further notice; it is like not so
Waiting at all. A daunting task of poise
Of the conflicting opinions is to be found
In the invisible operation of Heaven,
Following on the spiral into the abyss
Of the past precedents in many.
It is by this method of following
Downstream along the river of time
That we can complete our days
Without any great disturbances
Of our pacified at last minds.
as always, your work is compelling
Dan