Poetry Matters: My War with Archibald MacLeish
In 1926, MacLeish published his Ars Poetica, one of the most famous poems in American literature. (The title means The Rules of Poetry.) It begins:
A poem should be palpable and mute
As a globed fruit,
Dumb
As old medallions to the thumb.
This poem has been enthusiastically quoted ten million times, primarily in literature courses and writing workshops. Academics love it even though dull poems are almost guaranteed. Oh yes, mute and dumb are what poets should be dreaming about.
MacLeish created intellectual justification for what I call “The Plight Of Poetry,” namely, too much American poetry lacks passion and is boring. (Linked article is excellent for lit teachers.)
I wondered for several years if I could create a worthy counter-attack. Something rambunctious and startling, as MacLeish is murmurous and sleepy. My salvo was published this week on Rat’s Ass Review (which I found by looking for websites that sounded rowdy and likely to publish adventurous work).
THE RULES OF POETRY
–----for Archibald MacLeish
a poem should electrocute
and be hairy like a kiwi fruit
a poem should be
amorous and clamorous
like two starlets
seeking the same part
a poem should feel like
twelve-grit sandpaper
to the thumb
and emit an ominous hum
a poem may be untrue
and should conspire to undo you
a poem should be loud
and well endowed
and none too proud,
like this one
a poem should be Hitchcock squeals
and stiletto heels . . .
oh forget it.
TOES in a bottle
death in a purse
only fools make rules
for verse
Even professors will agree, my poem is more fun. I've always been inspired by the aesthetic that Walt Whitman expressed in Song of Myself (1855):
I too am not a bit tamed, I too am untranslatable,
I sound my barbaric yawp over the roofs of the world.
I believe this means we can do better than poems that are too polite and prissy, too carefully constructed as if they are clocks, too wrapped in Tiffany blue boxes. We want exuberance.
We want what e.e. cummings wrote about in 1923:
since feeling is first
who pays any attention
to the syntax of things
will never wholly kiss you
To show how long I have been engaged in this skirmish with MacLeish, here is my first try at counterattack from several decades ago, my Ars Poetica:
Oh to uncage words
as startling as birds
naked and silken
full of song and shriek
flung into the envious air
on a wonder of wings
to spin and soar and rise
dazzling our days
with surprise
Point is, the debate over prescribed forms versus more novel expressions runs through all the arts; and it will be debated forever. The problem comes when one group pretends to have stated some final truth.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/poetry-matters-my-war-archibald-macleish-bruce-deitrick-price/?published=t
much to ponder
enjoyed the read
NEVER STOP WRITING
m
There was a Roman guy named Catullus. He was witty and weird and passionate. Most of his poems from 20 centuries ago are more lively than what our academics write Basically, one thing I want from a poem is that it surprises me. I don't want same old, same old.
As for rap I'm comfortable with it because it's wild, rambunctious and doesn't obey many rules. On the other hand, if one rap song sounds like another rap song then I'm bored again.
I'm glad you used rhyme to emphasize your words. To me, both meter and rhyme count because they resonate with our natural processes like breathing and heartbeat. Why the beating of drums is so primal. I also believe that if a poem is not understood by the reader, it is not a very good poem.
Ron
Sandie