I'm wondering-- what the hell is the federal government doing keeping California from enacting strict emissions standards?
Shouldn't they be applauding an attempt to help the environment instead of pulling back hard like a parent with a child?
First of all: California can take care of itself without needless intervention.
Second: What right has the federal government to intervene in the first place? These laws are not unconstitutional, they are not discriminatory.
At least one of our Senators told her peers they should lay off before they ignored her stance and passed the bill anyway-- directly targeted at California.
Isn't that discrimination-- isn't that unconstitutional-- going against the "Full Faith and Credit"* given in each State or the undelegated "powers" that "are reserved to the States respectively"**
Maybe someday-- after the federal government tramples even more on the "reserved . . . powers" of California-- Congress will convene to find there are no representatives or senators from this great Republic present.
They, rather, at home, in their own Republic, the 6th best economy in the world, with all their "powers" and "rights" at hand with no fear of being trumped.
*Article IV, Section I of the U.S. Constitution **Amendment X to the U.S. Constitution
California got beat up by Enron or some such scandal, then blamed it on the old governor. Now you have tinkering going on because of campaign promises. Time for another recall? Thanks, J.
This is a political treatise that deals with the China issue from a completely new perspective. Disparaging as he may sound, from page to page, toward "the old system" and the Communist Party's various wiles, the author demonstrates his mysteriously
Love Tinka