Marriage--
a union between two consenting adults
perhaps . . .
the union of two citizens
or better yet . . .
the solemn agreement of a loving couple
to cherish and stay together as long as they both shall live.
Is it necessary to include
the usual anti-discrimination clauses
. . . regardless of race, color, gender, origin, religion, creed, or sexual orientation?
Better yet
is governmental defense
of a mostly religious definition of marriage
encroaching upon the limits of church and state?
What happened to liberty, justice, and equality for all?
Marriage--
a union between two consenting adults
perhaps . . .
the union of two citizens
or better yet . . .
the solemn agreement of a loving couple
to cherish and stay together as long as they both shall live--
. . . enough said.
marriage is, first and foremos, a civil matter,
the more inclussive the definition the btter...
j+
Love tinka
"What happened to liberty, justice, and equality for all?"
Simple the constitution was written by wasp (White Anglo-Saxson Protestent-in case anyone forgot what it meant) men for wasp men. Women and African Americans had to fight for their rights so why shouldn't GLBT? If I find the answer to that I'll let you know.
Thanks for showing your views!
Bingo.