Well, now I'm confused, but not really
(or maybe so)
You love me (and by you, I mean I) (and by me, I mean you) (and by love, I still mean love) ( . . . but I also mean are -- I mean am) (but "you, I mean I" -- is that not we?) (and would not "me, I mean you" be us?) but Love is still Love (except when it's are) (-- but that's really the same) We are us.
This might not be the ideal time for me to read "love poems",
but they seem to find me. Maybe they love me and by "they" I mean "not me", still it's me that "not me" loves. But who does "me" love? (Do me love! And maybe I'll do it to you?) You see, Leo, I'm really confused.
MY equations don't work out, that must be the source of my problem.
Maybe.
But you seem to have found the solution that works for you.
Can't be generalized, no it can't.
Solving love equations with the substitution method--not my favorite method(my favorite, is asking my brainiac brother)--but it works! I love it. --Charlie
Reviewed by William Cryer (Reader)
Reviewed on November 25, 2007
Revelling in words--and such orchestrated rhythm! It made me smile. A delightful dizzy romp.
“Being a couple yet free is our next challenge on the evolutionary ladder. This book successfully helps us unravel the myths that block that achievement. It does it with warmth, with readability, and with balance. It recreates everyday problems and
Share
Print
Save
Follow
but they seem to find me. Maybe they love me and by "they" I mean "not me", still it's me that "not me" loves. But who does "me" love? (Do me love! And maybe I'll do it to you?) You see, Leo, I'm really confused.
MY equations don't work out, that must be the source of my problem.
Maybe.
But you seem to have found the solution that works for you.
Can't be generalized, no it can't.
Axilea
Ron
or are?
or. ..
a circular rhythm and eternal image/question/theme
clever.
,ness